Abstract:Sphalerite can form in different geological environments and is the main ore mineral of most Pb-Zn deposits. Trace elements in sphalerite combined with machine learning (ML) methods have been used for deposit type discrimination. However, the performance of different multivariate and ML methods is not systematically compared. Here more than four thousand laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry data from more than one hundred deposits were compiled and investigated by different multivariate and ML methods. Unsupervised multivariate and ML methods including principal component analysis (PCA) and t -distributed stochastic neighbor embedding ( t -SNE), and supervised multivariate and ML methods including partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB), and neural network (NN) are used to classify deposit types. The models are constructed for five deposit types, Mississippi Valley-type (MVT), Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS), sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX), Epithermal, and Skarn deposits, based on twelve elements in sphalerite, Fe, Pb, Mn, Co, Cu, Ga, Ge, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, and Sb. The PCA and PLS-DA methods show similar clustering results, where Epithermal, MVT, SEDEX, and Skarn deposits can be separated from other deposit types. The t -SNE method is only efficient in discriminating MVT, SEDEX, and Epithermal deposits. The KNN, RF, and NN methods show better performance than LR, SVM, and NB in terms of average accuracy and precision. The PCA, t -SNE, and PLS-DA methods have advantages in data visualization, whereas KNN, NN, and RF methods are more suitable for classification tasks. Feature importance analyses of the PLS-DA and RF methods show that the most important discriminant elements in the classification are Ge, Mn, In, Sn, Ga and Sb. The models based on PCA, PLS-DA, KNN, NN, and RF are used to predict sphalerite samples with uncertain origins. All the models give similar classification results for deposit types, which are consistent with the ore-forming geological setting. The multivariate and ML models, including discrimination diagrams of PCA and PLS-DA, can be used as the first screening for the type of Pb-Zn mineralization in mineral exploration.

Machine Learning Prediction of Ore Deposit Genetic Type Using Magnetite Geochemistry

Discrimination of deposit types using magnetite geochemistry based on machine learning

Machine learning coupled with mineral geochemistry reveals the origin of ore deposits

Mineral search prediction based on Random Forest algorithm ——A case study on porphyry-epithermal copper polymetallic deposits in the western Gangdise meatallogenic belt

Machine learning for geochemical exploration: classifying metallogenic fertility in arc magmas and insights into porphyry copper deposit formation

Geochemical Discrimination of Pyrite in Diverse Ore Deposit Types Through Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Techniques

Application of Machine Learning to Research on Trace Elemental Characteristics of Metal Sulfides in Se-Te Bearing Deposits

Discrimination of Pb-Zn deposit types using the trace element data of galena based on deep learning

Intelligent Identification and Prediction Mineral Resources Deposit Based on Deep Learning

Applications of deep convolutional neural networks in prospecting prediction based on two-dimensional geological big data

Deposit Type Discrimination of Jiaodong Gold Deposits Using Random Forest Algorithm: Constraints from Trace Elements of Pyrite

Revealing the Multi-Stage Ore-Forming History of a Mineral Deposit Using Pyrite Geochemistry and Machine Learning-Based Data Interpretation

Mineral prospectivity mapping based on Support vector machine and Random Forest algorithm-A case study from Ashele copper-zinc deposit, Xinjiang, NW China

Interpreting Mineral Deposit Genesis Classification with Decision Maps: A Case Study Using Pyrite Trace Elements

Deposit type discrimination based on trace elements in sphalerite

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Classification of Pb–Zn Deposit Types Using LA–ICP–MS Data of Sphalerite

Development of a machine learning model to classify mineral deposits using sphalerite chemistry and mineral assemblages

A Method for Classification of Heavy Mineral Based on Machine Learning.

Geochemical studies and resource potential of magnetite in Taiwanese beach sands and related source rocks: Implications for geochemical fingerprinting of ore minerals

Machine learning prediction of mafic–ultramafic rock-related Cr-spinel formation environments and its application to the tectonic settings of magmatic sulfide deposits

Rock Classification in a Vanadiferous Titanomagnetite Deposit Based on Supervised Machine Learning