Abstract:BackgroundDonor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cf-DNA) tests offer a non-invasive alternative to biopsy for allograft surveillance in solid organ transplantation. Unlike biopsies, dd-cf-DNA tests are not subject to interpretation bias and have the potential to detect subclinical rejection, which can lead to graft dysfunction and poor outcomes. At our institution, dd-cf-DNA testing is currently offered as a send out test and we sought to evaluate its efficacy in monitoring our post-transplant patients.MethodsWe retrospectively examined electronic health records of 50 renal transplant patients with dd-cf-DNA (using AlloSure and Prospera assays) between January 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2022 to assess diagnostic utility of dd-cf-DNA relative to donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and biopsy (all predictors of graft function). Statistical analysis included correlation testing with t-tests.ResultsOverall, dd-cf-DNA levels correlated with DSA levels (p = 0.0002) and patients with both HLA-class I and II DSA had significantly higher dd-cf-DNA levels (p< 0.05). The Prospera dd-cf-DNA assay appeared to be a better predictor of DSA levels (p = 0.04) than the Allosure dd-cf-DNA assay. Though not statistically significant, there was trend towards an increase in dd-cf-DNA in patient with biopsy-proven graft injury and rejection vs no rejection. Interestingly, dd-cf-DNA levels were significantly elevated in patients with biopsy-proven antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Because dd-cfDNA levels have been reported to be impacted by sensitizing events including prior transplant, we evaluated and observed levels of dd-cf-DNA to be higher in patients with a history of more than one graft vs single graft recipients (p< 0.0001) and this observation was prominent in the Allosure assay.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that dd-cf-DNA testing holds promise as a valuable tool for graft surveillance and early detection of ABMR. The lack of correlation with biopsy-confirmed rejections may be attributed to the dd-cf-DNA assays' ability to detect rejection events earlier in the disease progression process compared to biopsy. Time course analysis will be beneficial. Additionally, the observed differences between AlloSure and Prospera emphasize the significance of thoroughly evaluating and selecting assays, particularly in multi-transplant recipients. We highlight that our initial analysis is limited due to a small sample size. However, we aim to assess 200 patients by the conclusion of this study.

An Assessment of the Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Surveillance in Patients With Preserved Kidney Allograft Function

Prognostic Value of the Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Assay in Acute Renal Rejection Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Cell-Free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft rejection

The Current State of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Use in Allograft Monitoring in Kidney Transplantation

Elevation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Before Biopsy-proven Rejection in Kidney Transplant

Understanding Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: An Overview and Case-based Guide for Clinicians

B-234 Evaluating the diagnostic utility of dd-cf-dna in renal allograft surveillance: a single-center perspective

Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury

Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications

Early clinical experience using donor‐derived cell‐free DNA to detect rejection in kidney transplant recipients

Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor specific antibody testing as non-invasive biomarkers for rejection in kidney transplantation

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for detection of allograft rejection in pediatric kidney transplants

Donor-derived cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsies to determine future kidney transplant rejection

Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA for Personalized Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Analysis of the primary factors influencing donor derived cell-free DNA testing in kidney transplantation

Dynamics of Early Post-Operative Plasma Ddcfdna Levels in Kidney Transplantation: a Single-Center Pilot Study.

Early Monitoring of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Allograft Recipients Followed-Up for Two Years: Experience of One Center

Donor-derived cell-free DNA can discriminate acute rejection types after kidney transplantation

Donor-derived cell-free DNA predicted allograft rejection and severe microvascular inflammation in kidney transplant recipients

Clinical Rationale for a Routine Testing Schedule Using Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA After Kidney Transplantation

Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Levels Are Associated with the Inflammatory Burden and Macrophage Extracellular Trap Activity in Renal Allografts.