Abstract:Differential privacy (DP) is a promising tool for preserving privacy during data publication, as it provides strong theoretical privacy guarantees in face of adversaries with arbitrary background knowledge. Histogram, as the result of a set of count queries, serves as a core statistical tool to report data distributions and is in fact viewed as the fundamental method for many other statistical analysis such as range queries. It is an important form for data publishing. In this paper, we consider the scenario of publishing sensitive histogram data with differential privacy scheme. Existing work in this field has justified that, comparing to directly applying DP techniques (i.e., injecting noise) over the counts in histogram bins, grouping bins before noise injection is more effective (i.e., with higher utility) as it introduces much less error over the sanitized histogram given the same privacy budget. However, state-of-the-art works have not unveiled how the overall utility of a sanitized histogram can be affected by the balance between the privacy budget distributed between grouping and noise injection phases. In this work, we conduct a theoretical study towards how the probability of getting better groups can be improved such that the overall error introduced in sanitized histogram can be further reduced, which directly leads to a higher utility for the sanitized histograms. In particular, we show that the probability of achieving better grouping can be affected by two factors, namely privacy budget assigned in grouping and the normalized utility function used for selecting groups. Motivated by that, we propose a new DP histogram publishing scheme, namely Iterative Histogram Partition, in which we carefully assign privacy budget between grouping and injection phases based on our theoretical study. We also theoretically prove that ϵ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\epsilon $$\end{document}-differential privacy can be achieved according to our new scheme. Moreover, we also show that, under the same privacy budget, our scheme exhibits less errors in the sanitized histograms comparing with state-of-the-art methods. We also extends the model to multi-dimensional histogram publication cases. Finally, empirical study over four real-world datasets also justifies that our scheme achieves the least error among series of state-of-the-art baseline methods.

Differential privacy histogram publishing method based on dynamic sliding window

Differentially Private Histogram Publication for Dynamic Datasets: an Adaptive Sampling Approach.

DPHMM: Customizable Data Release with Differential Privacy Via Hidden Markov Model.

Differentially Private Histogram Publishing Through Fractal Dimension For Dynamic Datasets

Streaming Histogram Publication Over Weighted Sliding Windows Under Differential Privacy

IHP: improving the utility in differential private histogram publication

Differentially private data release through multidimensional partitioning

Face Image Publication Based on Differential Privacy

Horizontally Partitioned Data Publication with Differential Privacy

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

SoK: Chasing Accuracy and Privacy, and Catching Both in Differentially Private Histogram Publication

A Utility-Optimized Framework for Personalized Private Histogram Estimation

LoHDP: Adaptive local differential privacy for high‐dimensional data publishing

Dynamic Edge-Based High-Dimensional Data Aggregation with Differential Privacy

Differential Privacy on Dynamic Data

Towards answering analytical query over hierarchical histogram under untrusted servers

Sample and Threshold Differential Privacy: Histograms and applications

Differentially Private Projected Histograms of Multi-Attribute Data for Classification

Publishing Common Neighbors Histograms of Social Networks under Edge Differential Privacy

Wasserstein Differential Privacy

Privacy protection in government data sharing: an improved LDP-based approach