Development of the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Orientation Scale for College Students
Shuwei Sun,Haiyan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S402850
IF: 3.974
2023-03-10
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Shuwei Sun, 1 Haiyan Zhang 2 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; 2 Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Haiyan Zhang, Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Tongshan, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221116, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 15996963625, Email Background: "The cultural tightness-looseness orientation of college students", which involves college students' cognition about tolerance for non-learning-behavior in class, strength of learning-behavior norms in class, and strength of social norms in the generalized macro-context, offers a new perspective to explain college students' psychology and behavior and could effectively promote their all-round development. However, there is severely lack of a reliable and valid instrument. Hence, we seek to develop the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Orientation Scale for College Students (CTLOS-S) in the Chinese context. Methods: We firstly pooled the initial 17 measuring items of CTLOS-S through literature review and the open-ended interview. After conducting questionnaire survey among 264 college students using the initial scale, we did a series of reliability and validity tests to get the formal CTLOS-S, based on which we further administered questionnaire survey among 755 college students to check its reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, content validity, and across-gender invariance. Results: The formal CTLOS-S contains 7-item subscale of tolerance orientation for non-learning-behavior in class, 4-item subscale of strength orientation of learning-behavior norms in class, and 3-item subscale of strength orientation of social norms in the generalized macro-context. The testing results of the second-stage questionnaire survey data (N = 755) demonstrate that the reliability coefficients of CTLOS-S and its three subscales are 0.85, 0.85, 0.83, and 0.76 separately, the internal 3-factor structure validity of CTLOS-S is satisfactorily acceptable with χ 2 (74) = 318.76, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.06, and SRMR = 0.04, and the content validity and criterion validity are satisfactory as the total score of CTLOS-S is positively correlated with each score of its three subscales and the total score of learning engagement scale. Besides, the 3-factor structure of CTLOS-S is invariant across gender. Conclusion: The 14-item CTLOS-S we develop is a reliable and valid instrument for researchers to conduct quantitative studies on college students' cultural tightness-looseness orientation. Keywords: the cultural tightness-looseness orientation of college students, tolerance orientation for non-learning-behavior in class, strength orientation of learning-behavior norms in class, strength orientation of social norms in the generalized macro-context As an effective way to promote college students' all-round development, scientifically explaining and accurately predicting their psychology and behavior undoubtedly could provide a reliable guarantee for the healthy and sustainability of higher education development. Therefore, scholars in all kinds of fields or disciplines up to now have been tirelessly exploring college students' psychology and behavior from a variety of perspectives such as personality, 1 attitude and motive, 2,3 growth background and macro environment, 4 teachers' feedback, 5 and so on. Since social norms are well confirmed to play crucial roles in influencing human beings' psychology and behavior, 6,7 the concept "cultural tightness-looseness", which mainly depicts human beings' strength of social norms for important behaviors and tolerance for behavioral deviance, 8–10 can be applied to college students, who are the fundamental audience as well as the vital consumers of higher education, and is more likely to become a new, important perspective to understand and foresee college students' psychology and behavior. Moreover, a great number of the existing theoretical and empirical studies regarding the definition, 8–12 the influencing factors, 7,10,12–14 the operationalization, 10,12,15–17 and the consequences of cultural tightness-looseness 16–33 have laid solid foundation for scientifical interpretation and accurate prediction of college students' psychology and behavior from this new perspective. Surely, we cannot directly use this somewhat "broad" concept to explore college students' psychology and behavior since college students have their own particularities in terms of their cultural tightness-looseness. For example, college studen -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary