Abstract:Abstract Background Circadian clocks allow organisms to anticipate daily fluctuations in their environment by driving rhythms in physiology and behavior. Inter-organismal differences in daily rhythms, called chronotypes, exist and can shift with age. In ants, age, caste-related behavior and chronotype appear to be linked. Brood-tending nurse ants are usually younger individuals and show “around-the-clock” activity. With age or in the absence of brood, nurses transition into foraging ants that show daily rhythms in activity. Ants can adaptively shift between these behavioral castes and caste-associated chronotypes depending on social context. We investigated how changes in daily gene expression could be contributing to such behavioral plasticity in Camponotus floridanus carpenter ants by combining time-course behavioral assays and RNA-Sequencing of forager and nurse brains. Results We found that nurse brains have three times fewer 24 h oscillating genes than foragers. However, several hundred genes that oscillated every 24 h in forager brains showed robust 8 h oscillations in nurses, including the core clock genes Period and Shaggy . These differentially rhythmic genes consisted of several components of the circadian entrainment and output pathway, including genes said to be involved in regulating insect locomotory behavior. We also found that Vitellogenin , known to regulate division of labor in social insects, showed robust 24 h oscillations in nurse brains but not in foragers. Finally, we found significant overlap between genes differentially expressed between the two ant castes and genes that show ultradian rhythms in daily expression. Conclusion This study provides a first look at the chronobiological differences in gene expression between forager and nurse ant brains. This endeavor allowed us to identify a putative molecular mechanism underlying plastic timekeeping: several components of the ant circadian clock and its output can seemingly oscillate at different harmonics of the circadian rhythm. We propose that such chronobiological plasticity has evolved to allow for distinct regulatory networks that underlie behavioral castes, while supporting swift caste transitions in response to colony demands. Behavioral division of labor is common among social insects. The links between chronobiological and behavioral plasticity that we found in C. floridanus , thus, likely represent a more general phenomenon that warrants further investigation.

Individual differences in honey bee behavior enabled by plasticity in brain gene regulatory networks

Behavior-specific changes in transcriptional modules lead to distinct and predictable neurogenomic states

Single-nucleus and Spatial Transcriptome Identify Brain Landscape of Gene Regulatory Networks Associated with Behavioral Maturation in Honeybees

Understanding the Relationship Between Brain Gene Expression and Social Behavior: Lessons from the Honey Bee

Gene expression and chromatin conformation differs between worker bees performing different tasks

The gene expression network regulating queen brain remodeling after insemination and its parallel use in ants with reproductive workers

Genome‐wide Analysis Reveals Differences in Brain Gene Expression Patterns Associated with Caste and Reproductive Status in Honey Bees (apis Mellifera)

Genome Scan for Cis-Regulatory DNA Motifs Associated with Social Behavior in Honey Bees.

Molecular analyses of individual variation in honey bee sociability

The Transcription Factor Krüppel Homolog 1 is Linked to Hormone Mediated Social Organization in Bees

Intragenomic conflict underlies extreme phenotypic plasticity in queen-worker caste determination in honey bees ( )

Honeybee Gut Microbiota Modulates Host Behaviors and Neurological Processes

The Neuroproteomic Basis of Enhanced Perception and Processing of Brood Signals That Trigger Increased Reproductive Investment in Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Workers

Genetics in the Honey Bee: Achievements and Prospects toward the Functional Analysis of Molecular and Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Behaviors

Developmental Plasticity Shapes Social Traits and Selection in a Facultatively Eusocial Bee.

Repeated shifts in sociality are associated with fine-tuning of highly conserved and lineage-specific enhancers in a socially flexible bee

Gut microbiota contribute to variations in honey bee foraging intensity

Shifting behaviour: epigenetic reprogramming in eusocial insects

Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain

Gene expression and epigenetics reveal species-specific mechanisms acting upon common molecular pathways in the evolution of task division in bees

Time-course RNASeq of Camponotus floridanus forager and nurse ant brains indicate links between plasticity in the biological clock and behavioral division of labor