Abstract:The demand for residential aged care is increasing due to the ageing population. Optimising the design or adapting the physical environment of residential aged care facilities has the potential to influence quality of life, mood and function. To assess the effects of changes to the physical environment, which include alternative models of residential aged care such as a 'home‐like' model of care (where residents live in small living units) on quality of life, behaviour, mood and depression and function in older people living in residential aged care. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases and two trial registries were searched on 11 February 2021. Reference lists and grey literature sources were also searched. Non‐randomised trials, repeated measures or interrupted time series studies and controlled before‐after studies with a comparison group were included. Interventions which had modified the physical design of a care home or built a care home with an alternative model of residential aged care (including design alterations) in order to enhance the environment to promote independence and well‐being were included. Studies which examined quality of life or outcomes related to quality of life were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the abstracts identified in the search and the full texts of all retrieved studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias in each included study and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to GRADE criteria. Where possible, data were represented in forest plots and pooled. Twenty studies were included with 77,265 participants, although one large study included the majority of participants (n = 74,449). The main comparison was home‐like models of care incorporating changes to the scale of the building which limit the capacity of the living units to smaller numbers of residents and encourage the participation of residents with domestic activities and a person‐centred care approach, compared to traditional designs which may include larger‐scale buildings with a larger number of residents, hospital‐like features such as nurses' stations, traditional hierarchical organisational structures and design which prioritises safety. Six controlled before‐after studies compared the home‐like model and the traditional environment (75,074 participants), but one controlled before‐after study included 74,449 of the participants (estimated on weighting). It is uncertain whether home‐like models improve health‐related quality of life, behaviour, mood and depression, function or serious adverse effects compared to traditional designs because the certainty of the evidence is very low. The certainty of the evidence was downgraded from low‐certainty to very low‐certainty for all outcomes due to very serious concerns due to risk of bias, and also serious concerns due to imprecision for outcomes with more than 400 participants. One controlled before‐after study examined the effect of home‐like models on quality of life. The author stated "No statistically significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups." Three studies reported on global behaviour (N = 257). One study found little or no difference in global behaviour change at six months using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory where lower scores indicate fewer behavioural symptoms (mean difference (MD) ‐0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.13 to 0.04, n = 164)), and two additional studies (N = 93) examined global behaviour, but these were unsuitable for determining a summary effect estimate. Two controlled before‐after studies examined the effect of home‐like models of care compared to traditional design on depression. After 18 months, one study (n = 242) reported an increase in the rate of depressive symptoms (rate ratio 1.15 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.29)), but the effect of home‐like models of care on the probability of no depressive symptoms was uncertain (odds ratio 0.36(95% CI 0.12 to 1.07)). One study (n = 164) reported little or no difference in depressive symptoms at six months using the Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist where lower scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms (MD 0.01 (95% CI ‐0.12 to 0.14)). Four controlled before‐after studies examined function. One study (n = 242) reported little or no difference in function over 18 months using the Activities of Daily Living long‐form scale where lower scores indicate better function (MD ‐0.09 (95% CI ‐0.46 to 0.28)), and one study (n = 164) reported better function scores at six months using the Interview for the Deterioration of Daily Living activities in Dementia where lower scores indicate better function (MD ‐4.37 (95% CI ‐7.06 to ‐1.69)). Two additional studies measured function but could not be included in the quantitative analysis. One study examined serious adverse effects (physical restraints), and reported a slight reduction in the importa -Abstract Truncated-

Renovations of a Long-Term Care Center for Residents with Advanced Dementia—Impact on Residents and Staff

The Effect of Dining Room Physical Environmental Renovations on Person-Centered Care Practice and Residents' Dining Experiences in Long-Term Care Facilities

Do physical environmental changes make a difference? Supporting person-centered care at mealtimes in nursing homes

Renovating Space to Age in Place: Experiences of Elderly Residents Living through Public Housing Renovations and Reflections from Affordable Housing Developers

Staff perspectives on the role of physical environment in long-term care facilities on dementia care in Canada and Sweden

Building Clinical Leadership Competencies When Caring for Hospitalized Adults Experiencing Dementia

Mechanisms of impact and contextual aspects of a dementia special care unit in long-term care: a process evaluation

Redesigning Rooms of Clients With Intellectual Disabilities and Severe Behavioral Problems in a Long-term Care Facility: Three Case Studies

Exploring the influence of indoor environment and spatial layout on changed behaviours of people with dementia in a nursing home

Implementing a new living concept for persons with dementia in long-term care: evaluation of a quality improvement process

How Enclosure and Spatial Organization Affect Residents’ Use and Experience of a Dementia Special Care Unit: A Case Study

Interior Environments in Long-Term Care Units From the Theory of Supportive Design

Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people.

Improving Healthcare Quality and Clinical Outcomes for Persons with Dementia in the Sub-Acute Hospital Through Person-Centered Care Practice

450 - Exploring staff perspectives on the role of physical environment in dementia care facilities in Sweden and Canada

Implementation and outcomes of a dementia-friendly training program in five hospitals

Effect of Soundscape Augmentation on Behavioral Symptoms in People With Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Dementia-Friendly "Design": Impact on COVID-19 Death Rates in Long-Term Care Facilities Around the World.

Examining the Relationships Between Indoor Environmental Quality Parameters Pertaining to Light, Noise, Temperature, and Humidity and the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of People Living With Dementia: Scoping Review

P182: Effects of Physical Environment on Quality of Life of Residents in Dementia Facilities in Canada & South Korea: A Longitudinal Observational Study

The effect on nursing home resident outcomes of creating a household within a traditional structure