Mark Gilbert and Daniele Pasquinucci , eds. Euroscepticisms: The Historical Roots of a Political Challenge. European Studies 36. Leiden: Brill, 2020. Pp. 235. $140.00 (cloth).

Anna Bil-Jaruzelska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2022.16

IF: 0.764

2022-05-06

Journal of British Studies

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0021937122000168/resource/name/firstPage-S0021937122000168a.jpg

history

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration

Catherine E. De Vries

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793380.001.0001

2018-01-18

Abstract:The European Union (EU) is facing one of the rockiest periods in its existence. At no time in its history has it looked so economically fragile, so insecure about how to protect its borders, so divided over how to tackle the crisis of legitimacy facing its institutions, and so under assault by Eurosceptic parties. The unprecedented levels of integration in recent decades have led to increased public contestation, yet at the same the EU is more reliant on public support for its continued legitimacy than ever before. This book examines the role of public opinion in the European integration process. It develops a novel theory of public opinion that stresses the deep interconnectedness between people’s views about European and national politics. It suggests that public opinion cannot simply be characterized as either Eurosceptic or not, but rather that it consists of different types. This is important because these types coincide with fundamentally different views about the way the EU should be reformed and which policy priorities should be pursued. These types also have very different consequences for behaviour in elections and referendums. Euroscepticism is such a diverse phenomenon because the Eurozone crisis has exacerbated the structural imbalances within the EU. As the economic and political fates of member states have diverged, people’s experiences with and evaluations of the EU and national political systems have also grown further apart. The heterogeneity in public preferences that this book has uncovered makes a one-size-fits-all approach to addressing Euroscepticism unlikely to be successful.
The odd couple: analyzing United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and Italian Five Stars Movement’s (FSM’s) European Union (EU)-opposition in the European Parliament (EP)

Benedetta Carlotti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2017.24

2017-11-21

Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica

Abstract:Since the late 2000s economic and immigration crises are testing the European Union (EU). Such challenges have opened up a period of radical change for the EU, among them, the Brexit referendum that will radically change EU’s geography. This turmoil is mirrored by the last European Parliament (EP) election results; extreme right- and left-wing parties succeeded in the electoral competition at the expense of their mainstream counterpart. These forces are generally labelled as ‘Eurosceptic’, even though the literature still lacks a clear-cut definition of Euroscepticism. Starting from this observation, this paper reviews the conceptual evolution of Euroscepticism, stressing its pros and cons and proposes a reconceptualization of it in terms of EU-opposition such that the objects of criticism are clearly identified as the EU-policies, the EU-elite, the EU-regime, and the EU-community. The paper applies ‘EU-opposition’ to examine empirically the activity of two ‘Eurosceptic’ parties in the EP: the Italian Five Stars Movement (FSM) and the British United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), using the speeches they deliver in the arena of the EP as the main source of data. From the analysis, it can be seen that UKIP and FSM are an odd couple working in the same party group in the EP, and the concept of EU-opposition is able to better disentangle UKIP and FSM’s criticism of the EU.
Issues in EU and US Foreign Policy, Edited by M. Cebeci (plymouth: Lexington Books, 2011, ISBN 9780739147177); Vii+394pp., £51.95 Hb.

Simon. J. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12072_8

2013-01-01

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies

Abstract:JCMS: Journal of Common Market StudiesVolume 51, Issue 6 p. 1212-1213 Book Review Issues in EU and US Foreign Policy, edited by M Cebeci (Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2011, ISBN 9780739147177); vii+394pp., £51.95 hb. Simon. J. Smith, Simon. J. Smith Aston UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Simon. J. Smith, Simon. J. Smith Aston UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 14 October 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12072_8Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Volume51, Issue6November 2013Pages 1212-1213 RelatedInformation
From narrative to counter-narrative: the European constraint and the rise of Italian populist Euroscepticism

Daniele Pasquinucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1839396

2020-10-20

Journal of Contemporary European Studies

Abstract:This article argues that in Italy since the 1950s many Europhile technocrats conceived of the European Community as an external constraint needed to regulate a country that was incapable of governing itself. With the Maastricht Treaty this constraint was transformed into a key element of the public narrative about 'Europe'. The emphasis placed on budgetary discipline that must be respected to join the Eurozone promoted an identification between tool and objective: the constraint was Europe. The recent economic-financial crises paved the way for a reversal of the meaning of the constraint, which turned into a negative paradigm. This reversal implies a form of 'othering': 'Europe' is opposed to the Italian people. Eurosceptic parties have promoted and taken advantage of this reversal. The alleged otherness of 'Europe' has given them the chance to call for a return to full national sovereignty. Based on theanalysis of archival and media sources, autobiographies and the existing literature about the contemporary history of Italy and its role in European integration, this article traces the historical trajectory of the pro-integration narrative of the 'European constraint'. It will also show how this narrative produced unintended consequences that have strongly shaped Eurosceptic counter-narratives to the EU in Italy.

area studies,political science,international relations
A Brief Research into Euroscepticism in EU

Li Mingming,Xu Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13549/j.cnki.cn11-3959/d.2011.04.006

2011-01-01

Abstract:Euroscepticism is a key concept and discourse in current EU politics.As a kind of the politics of opposition,it plays important roles in the process of European integration.Euroscepticism has influenced EU politics in the ways of European negotiations and domestic politicization of European integration.The developments of Euroscepticism in EU citizens and parties have produced political cleavages,which reflect disputes and contradictions in process of European integration.
Responding to the crisis: Eurosceptic parties of the left and right and their changing position towards the European Union

DANIELA BRAUN,SEBASTIAN ADRIAN POPA,HERMANN SCHMITT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12321

2019-02-08

European Journal of Political Research

Abstract:At the time of the election of the European Parliament (EP) in 2014, the European Union (EU) was heavily affected by a multifaceted crisis that had – and still has – far‐reaching implications for the political system of its member countries, but also for the European level of governance. Against the background of the strong Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 EP elections, this study aims to investigate in which way Eurosceptic parties of the left and the right respond to the multiple crises of the EU. Using data from the Euromanifesto Project from 2004/2009 and 2014, changes in the party positions towards the EU are analysed in the shadow of the multiple crises and the reasons thereof are explored. The findings show a general anti‐European shift among the two types of Eurosceptic parties. Nevertheless, the changes in the EU polity tone are not determined by issue‐based repercussions of the multiple crises, but by the EU‐related evaluation – the polity mood – of the national citizenry. For far‐right Eurosceptic parties, the shift is moderated by the level of public support for EU integration in their national environment. Among far‐left Eurosceptic parties, by contrast, it is moderated by the more specific public attitudes about the monetary union policy of the EU. Consequently, political parties when drafting their manifestos for EP elections are not so much guided by the objective severity of political problems or by the evaluations of these problems by the citizenry. What matters in the end is the link that citizens themselves are able to establish between the severity of political problems, on the one hand, and the responsibility of the EU for these problems on the other. This has important consequences for understanding of the nature and substance of political responsiveness within the EU system of multilevel governance.

political science
Populism Against Europe in Social Media: The Eurosceptic Discourse on Twitter in Spain, Italy, France, and United Kingdom During the Campaign of the 2019 European Parliament Election

Laura Alonso-Muñoz,Andreu Casero-Ripollés

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00054

2020-08-07

Frontiers in Communication

Abstract:Since its inception, the European Union has been facing several challenges. The economic and refugee crises, along with the results of the British referendum, have shaped the future of Europe in the past decade. These challenges among others have encouraged the emergence of populist parties, which aim at disrupting the current status quo posing threats to democracy. In this context, the consolidation of digital media has played a key role in the circulation of populist messages to a large number of people. Such messages have questioned the political and legitimacy terms of the European Union, leading to the ideal scenario of Euroscepticism. This article examines the framing and communication strategies used by the European populist actors regarding the European Union and Euroscepticism. The aim is to identify if there are any significant ideological differences. The sample consists of the shared messages (n = 3,667) by the main European populist political parties of Spain, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom during the European Parliament election campaign in 2019. The messages published on the Twitter accounts of Podemos, Vox, the 5 Star Movement, Lega, Rassemblement National, France Insoumise, The Brexit Party, and the UKIP have been analyzed. Results show that two types of Eurosceptic discourse were detected depending on the ideology. The right-wing populists pose a Euroscepticism exclusionary discourse, based on the loss of sovereignty and the distinction of "they"—"us," excluding the out-groups whereas the left-wing populists present a Euroscepticism inclusive discourse, to maintain the foundational values of Europe, such as equality or solidarity between different people and countries. This research found that Eurosceptic discourse is used in the communicative strategy of populist political parties on Twitter and highlights the importance of the message frame which makes the difference about it.
Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in re-narrating the European discourse

Marzia Maccaferri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592766

IF: 1.642

2019-03-17

Critical Discourse Studies

Abstract:Europe as an idea as well as a political and cultural project has been a vast subject in the British public debate, The relationship between Britain and Europe was mostly regarded as extremely cautious and parochially nationalist; however, whereas in the 1960s and 1970s opposition to the European Economic Community (ECC) was predominantly led by intelligentsias and maverick politicians, the present-day debate seems less intellectually-driven and academic in his language. This article draws attention to the role of traditional and online media in re-narrating the European question. Within this process, the re-semioticization of the role of Great Britain in the international scenario vis-à-vis the historical and cultural discourses of borders between the UK and the Continent play a pivotal function. Starting from here, the article considers, on the one hand, how the current re-narration of the European question is reproducing and reinterpreting historical arguments vis-à-vis old clichés. On the other, it deals primarily with the response to the profound transition taking place in the political landscape.

communication
Rezension von: Ehinger, Siglind, Glaubenssolidarität im Zeichen des Pietismus

Eberhard Fritz,Siglind Ehinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53458/zwlg.v77i.1790

2022-02-17

Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte

Abstract:Siglind Ehinger, Glaubenssolidarität im Zeichen des Pietismus. Der württembergische Theologe Georg Konrad Rieger (1687 – 1743) und seine Kirchengeschichtsschreibung zu den Böhmischen Brüdern (Jabloniana, Quellen und Forschungen zur europäischen Kulturgeschichte, Bd. 7), Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2016. 275 S. ISBN 978-3-447-10649-8. € 64,–
Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation

Christian Joerges

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200019234

2014-08-01

German Law Journal

Abstract:The European Union rides through troubled waters. Its original reliance on law as the object and agent of the integration project and on the “economic constitution,” which the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)—as accomplished by the Treaty of Maastricht— expected to complete, have proven unsustainable. Following the financial and sovereign debt crises, individuals perceive the EMU, with its commitments to price stability and monetary politics, as a failed construction precisely because of its reliance on inflexible rules. The European crisis management seeks to compensate for these failures by means of regulatory machinery which disregards the European order of competences, takes power from national institutions, and burdens—in particular—Southern Europe with austerity measures; it establishes pan-European commitments to budgetary discipline and macroeconomic balancing. This abolishes the ideal of a legal ordering of the European economy, while the economic and social prospects of these efforts appear gloomy and the Union's political legitimacy becomes precarious. A fictitious debate between Carl Schmitt and Jürgen Habermas addresses the present critical constellation, where a number of Schmittian notions seem alarmingly realistic. This essay pleads for a more modest Europe committing itself to “unity in diversity,” the motto of the ill-fated Constitutional Treaty of 2003.
The Reformation of Historical Thought. Mark A. Lotito. St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Leiden: Brill, 2019. xx + 542 pp. €160.

Micha Lazarus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/rqx.2022.34

2022-01-01

Renaissance Quarterly

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0034433822000343/resource/name/firstPage-S0034433822000343a.jpg
A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of “Generation Identity”: Fascism, Online Media, and the European New Right

Imogen Richards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1662403

2019-09-30

Terrorism and Political Violence

Abstract:This article analyzes ideological and organizational characteristics of the pan-European youth movement, "Generation Identity" (GI), through a philosophical and historical lens. With a synoptic perspective on existing and original research, it outlines an analysis of key GI literature as well as its ideological influences, activist behavior, and media strategies. This research reveals that, like other twentieth and twenty-first century examples of neo-fascism, the movement is syncretic and attempts to legitimize its political aims through reference to historical quasi- and proto-fascist cases, in combination with popular left and right-wing political ideals. A reflection on GI's activist behavior, on the other hand, demonstrates that the movement is relatively unique in the field of current far-right politics; particularly in the extent to which it draws practical inspiration from the tactics and propagandizing strategies of contemporary left-wing movements. GI's online presence, including its leaders' promotion of gamification, also illustrates its distinctive appeal to young, relatively affluent, countercultural and digitally literate populations. Finally, while in many respects GI is characteristic of the "European New Right" (ENR), the analysis finds that its spokespersons' various promotion of capitalism and commodification, including through their advocacy of international trade and sale of merchandise, diverges from the anti-capitalist philosophizing of contemporary ENR thinkers.

political science,international relations
The Relaunch of the Benelux Union and the Origins of the Schengen Agreement: The Interplay of two Sub-Regional Experiences

Simone Paoli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907855-73

2020-01-01

Abstract: How can the new dynamic in European integration politics during the second half of the 1980’s be explained? What were the driving forces behind the Single European Act, the achievement of the Single Market, the Schengen agreement, the EC’s expansion to the south, and the new steps towards Monetary Union and the Common Foreign and Security Policy? In this book, using numerous discoveries from the archives, historians from 12 countries show how the European Community reacted to the challenges of globalisation and the reform initiatives by Mikhail Gorbachev. In doing so, they write a new chapter in the history of European integration: the emergence of the European Union. With contributions by Marta Alorda, Andrea Brait, Frédéric Bozo, Eric Bussière, Deborah Cuccia, Alice Cunha, Anjo G. Harryvan, Michael Gehler, Gilles Grin, Maria Eleonora Guasconi, Georg Kreis, Wilfried Loth, Marco Lovec, N. Piers Ludlow, Simone Paoli, Nicolae Paun, Kiran Klaus Patel, Daniela Preda, Frederike Schotters, Jasper Trautsch, Jan van der Harst, Laurent Warlouzet
Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation

CHRISTIAN RAUH,BART JOACHIM BES,MARTIJN SCHOONVELDE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12350

2019-07-02

European Journal of Political Research

Abstract:How do mainstream political executives cue their politicised constituencies on European integration? Moving beyond static expectations that EU politicisation induces executives to either undermine, defuse or defend integration, this article theorises executives' incentives under different configurations of public and partisan Euroscepticism in their home countries. Expectations are tested on the sentiment and complexity that executives attach to European integration in almost 9,000 public speeches delivered throughout the Euro Crisis. It is found that national leaders faced with sceptical public opinion and low levels of partisan Euroscepticism rhetorically undermine integration, whereas European Commissioners faced with similar conditions are prone to defend it. These responses intensify disproportionally with growing public Euroscepticism, but are moderated by Eurosceptic party strength in surprising ways. When such challenger parties come closer to absorbing the Eurosceptic potential in public opinion, executive communication turns more positive again but also involves less clear rhetorical signals. These findings move beyond existing uniform expectations on mainstream responses to Eurosceptic challenges and highlight the relevance of different domestic configurations of EU politicisation.

political science
Scott Redford & Nina Ergin (ed.). Cities and citadels in Turkey: from the Iron Age to the Seljuks (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 40). x+346 pages, numerous colour and bw 978-90-429-2712-4 hardback €86.

C. Gates

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00101371

2014-06-01

Antiquity

Abstract:case studies. Some chapters are more theoretical than others, some more polemic. ‘The myth of the chief: prestige goods, power and personhood in the European Bronze Age’ by Joanna Brück & David Fontijn is evidently polemic and inspiring although, at least in part, I tend to disagree with the relational approach to personhood as presented here which is contradicted by thousands of burials from Central and Northern Europe that speak of a normative, institutionalised social personhood. This issue is also the topic for much of Marie Louise Stig Sørensen’s chapter, ‘Identity, gender and dress in the European Bronze Age’, which in some ways balances and indirectly responds to Brück & Fontijn. But the latter also wish to challenge the whole idea of an advanced Bronze Age political economy based on commodity trade. Here Tobias Kienlin indirectly lends supports in his chapter on Bronze Age metalworking, seeing specialisation but not beyond local kinship groups. One only needs, however, to read a handful of the other contributions on trade, transport, technology and mining, or Christopher Pare’s chapter on ‘Weighing, commodification and money’ to find a different perspective. In this way, the thematic chapters engage the reader in an ongoing theoretical and interpretative argument, which also includes a ‘Rethinking of Bronze Age cosmology’ by Joakim Goldhahn and new interpretations of rock art from the Alps to Scandinavia. Many chapters deal with what adds up to an economic history of the Bronze Age: fields and land divisions, animals, plant cultivation, salt production and trade. Thus, Part I is full of engaging culture historical and interpretative articles that will provide a useful starting point for both the student and the Bronze Age researcher alike.

History
Schramm, Lucas. 2024. Crises of European Integration: Joining Together or Falling Apart? Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. XVII, 303 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54748-5.

Vahram Petrosyan,Lusine Harutyunyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46991/jops/2024.3.7.111

2024-09-09

Abstract:The book analyses the main factors of European integration crises, taking into account eight major cases from the early 1950s to recent times. The author pays special attention to constitutional crises, the euro crisis and the migration crisis, thus showing that crises have been an integral part of the process of European integration from its very beginning. Although the book does not analyse the current confrontation between Russia and the West, the author argues that European integration began with a serious setback, when member states failed to implement plans to create a European army through the European Defence Community. The global scale and radicality of the ongoing changes allow many researchers to suggest the formation of a new system of international relations. In parallel with these processes, many provisions and phenomena characterizing the system of international relations itself are being revised.
The Euro’s Taxing Path to Political Legitimacy

Matthias Matthijs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2023.2283285

2023-11-22

Critical Review

Abstract:In Europe’s Crisis of Legitimacy: Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone, Vivien Schmidt authoritatively charts how the European Union weathered the crisis of its single currency in the 2010s, gradually moving from fiscal austerity and structural reform to a more systemic solution and flexible interpretation of the euro’s governing rules. Using a discursive institutionalist approach in combination with a “systems theory” understanding of democratic decision making, Schmidt persuasively argues that we need to look at the euro problem as a fundamentally political problem that lacked democratic legitimacy as long as technocrats were in charge of policy solutions. Schmidt argues that the euro crisis needs to be broached from the point of view of the E.U.’s split-level legitimacy as well as the growing politicization of E.U. governance in an era of increasing populism and rising Euroskepticism. Schmidt’s application of discursive institutionalism allows readers to judge for themselves whose and which ideas mattered, why and in what way they were implemented, and how they gradually evolved over time.

political science
Virginia Doellgast, Nathan Lillie and Valeria Pulignano (eds) (2018), Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, £63.00, pp. 270, hbk.

PHILIP RATHGEB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000136

IF: 2.654

2020-06-16

Journal of Social Policy

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0047279420000136/resource/name/firstPage-S0047279420000136a.jpg

public administration,social work,social issues
The German Historical School and European Economic Thought

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674315

2015-10-30

Abstract:The financial crisis of 2008 has revived interest in economic scholarship from a historical perspective. The most in depth studies of the relationship between economics and history can be found in the work of the so-called German Historical School (GHS). The influence of the GHS in the USA and Britain has been well documented, but far less has been written on the rest of Europe. This volume studies the interconnection between economic thought and economic policy from the mid-nineteenth century to the interwar period. It examines how the School’s ideas spread and was interpreted in different European countries between 1850 and 1930, analysing its legacies in these countries. In doing so, the book is able to trace the interconnection between economic thought and economic policy, adding new voices to the debate on the diffusion of ideas and flow of knowledge. This book identifies issues related to topics such as nationalism and cosmopolitanism in the history of ideas and clarifies themes in policy making that are still currently debated. These include monetary policy and benefits of free trade for all parties involved in international exchanges. This book will be of a great interest to those who study history of economic thought, economic theory and political economy
“Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union”. Any support from the citizens?

Francesco Farina,Roberto Tamborini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-10

2017-05-03

ECONOMICS

Abstract:Abstract The ‘Five Presidents Report’ cited in the title acknowledges that an important driver of the European economic crisis has been the faulty original design of the Monetary Union, and that substantial steps are urgently needed towards the creation of truly supranational institutions. Yet, economists tend to neglect that however compelling economic analyses may be, the stumbling block on the way of the reform of the Monetary Union is political will, and that in democracies the ultimate source of political will comes from electors. In this paper, first of all the authors wish to bring to the economists’ attention some recent analyses of citizens’ attitudes towards Europe from political science. Then, by cross-referencing the results of the 2014 elections of the European Parliament with Eurobarometer opinion polls eliciting judgements for the EU vis-à-vis home countries and an indicator of economic pain, the authors show the presence of a geo-economicpolitical cleavage across four groups of countries. This is more complex, and perhaps worse, than the simplistic divide between ‘North’ and ‘South’ or ‘Core’ and ‘Periphery’. The main implication is that the EU experiences a stalemate between ‘more Europe vs. less Europe’ at the level of peoples, which seriously undermines support for further integration ‘from below’.

Mark Gilbert and Daniele Pasquinucci , eds. Euroscepticisms: The Historical Roots of a Political Challenge. European Studies 36. Leiden: Brill, 2020. Pp. 235. $140.00 (cloth).

Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration

The odd couple: analyzing United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and Italian Five Stars Movement’s (FSM’s) European Union (EU)-opposition in the European Parliament (EP)

Issues in EU and US Foreign Policy, Edited by M. Cebeci (plymouth: Lexington Books, 2011, ISBN 9780739147177); Vii+394pp., £51.95 Hb.

From narrative to counter-narrative: the European constraint and the rise of Italian populist Euroscepticism

A Brief Research into Euroscepticism in EU

Responding to the crisis: Eurosceptic parties of the left and right and their changing position towards the European Union

Populism Against Europe in Social Media: The Eurosceptic Discourse on Twitter in Spain, Italy, France, and United Kingdom During the Campaign of the 2019 European Parliament Election

Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in re-narrating the European discourse

Rezension von: Ehinger, Siglind, Glaubenssolidarität im Zeichen des Pietismus

Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation

The Reformation of Historical Thought. Mark A. Lotito. St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Leiden: Brill, 2019. xx + 542 pp. €160.

A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of “Generation Identity”: Fascism, Online Media, and the European New Right

The Relaunch of the Benelux Union and the Origins of the Schengen Agreement: The Interplay of two Sub-Regional Experiences

Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation

Scott Redford & Nina Ergin (ed.). Cities and citadels in Turkey: from the Iron Age to the Seljuks (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 40). x+346 pages, numerous colour and bw 978-90-429-2712-4 hardback €86.

Schramm, Lucas. 2024. Crises of European Integration: Joining Together or Falling Apart? Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. XVII, 303 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54748-5.

The Euro’s Taxing Path to Political Legitimacy

Virginia Doellgast, Nathan Lillie and Valeria Pulignano (eds) (2018), Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, £63.00, pp. 270, hbk.

The German Historical School and European Economic Thought

“Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union”. Any support from the citizens?