Abstract:One of the most concrete but also problematic aspects of what may be labelled ‘rule of law backsliding’ is not only the increasing number of bodies masquerading as courts but also the increasing number of individuals masquerading as judges, with the situation in Poland being exhibit A in this respect. This paper will focus on the latter issue in light of the right to a tribunal previously established by law. In EU law, the right to a tribunal established by law is an aspect of the right to a fair trial and is provided for in the first sentence of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter. While there is ample case law concerning the requirements that courts must be independent and impartial, the Court of Justice had not interpreted and applied the term ‘established by law’ to comprehensively review a judicial appointment procedure until its Grand Chamber judgment of 26 March 2020 in Simpson and HG. While the Court’s ruling does not directly concern a national judicial appointment procedure but rather an irregularity affecting the procedure for the appointment of a judge to the former EU Civil Service Tribunal, this paper contends that the Court of Justice’s reasoning can be extrapolated to the situation where irregularities have affected national judicial appointment procedures and this is indeed what this paper will attempt to do as regards the situation in Poland in light of the Polish Supreme Court’s findings in its resolution of 23 January 2020. This paper will conclude by assessing the extent to which (if any), individuals appointed to Polish ordinary courts and Supreme Court posts on the basis of the Polish law of 8 December 2017 amending the Law on the National Council of the Judiciary, and the individuals appointed to the Constitutional Tribunal without a legal basis as well as the unlawfully appointed President of the said Tribunal in December 2016, may be considered proper judges or, on the contrary, to borrow from English law, ‘de facto judges’ or ‘usurpers’. In this respect, it will also be submitted that the Polish law of 14 February 2020, informally known as the ‘muzzle law’, cannot constitute a lawful obstacle when it comes to dealing with usurpers and more generally, assessing the lawfulness of any judicial appointment made by the Polish president.

Judging the Communist Past: Historians and Cultural Expertise in Polish Administrative Courts

Kyrill Kunakhovich. Communism’s Public Sphere: Culture as Politics in Cold War Poland and East Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2022

The Attempts for the Ethicization of History by Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe

Complicity at a distance: commemorating problematic involvement in perpetration in contemporary Central and Eastern European literatures

The unwanted past and urban regeneration of Communist heritage cities. Case study: European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) Riga 2014, Pilsen 2015 and Wroclaw 2016

Dealing With ‘Fake Judges’ Under EU Law: Poland as a Case Study in Light of the Court of Justice’s Ruling of 26 March 2020 in Simpson and HG

The Reform Communist Interpretation of the Stalinist Period in Czech Historiography and Its Legacy

National or Multicultural? A Common Narrative about History in the Baltic States after 1991

Who Benefits from the Past? The Process of Cultural Heritage Management in the Field of Animation in Poland (The Case of the Se-Ma-For Film Studio in Łódź)

The rhetoric of ideological transgression: History and psychological language in the archives of the Securitate

Interwar and Contemporary Poland. A Comparison of the Protection of Minority Rights in the Second and in the Third Polish Republics

Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland: What They Share and What They Do Not

The Genius loci Issue in the Revalorization of Post-Military Complexes: Selected Case Studies in Legnica (Poland)

Representations of Holocaust protagonists in history education in Polish primary schools under the rule of the Law and Justice party

Modern Marriage and the Culture of Sexuality: Experts between the State and the Church in Poland, 1956–1970

Admitting (to) the past: transitional justice in the European and Inter-American courts of human rights

Evaluation of the Results of the Historical and Legal Comparison of the Juvenile Justice of Ukraine and Poland in the 1920s

‘It was Never Just About the Statue’: Ethos of historical figures in public debates on contested cultural objects

Nationalities relations in a totalitarian state. The case of East Central Europe under Soviet occupation (1939-1941) – methodological issues and a research agenda

Judicial Interpretation and Competition Law Enforcement: Authoritarian Legal Culture, Semantic Dissonance and Skewed Agencification in Post-Socialist Croatia

STRATEGIC PROGRAMMING IN POLAND – CHANGES WITHIN HISTORICAL PERIODS