Abstract:Background: The digitalization of healthcare requires users to have sufficient competence in using digital health technologies. In the Netherlands, as well as in other countries, there is a need for a comprehensive, person-centered assessment of eHealth literacy to understand and address eHealth literacy related needs, to improve equitable uptake and use of digital health technologies. Objective: We aimed to translate and culturally adapt the original eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) to Dutch and to collect initial validity evidence. Methods: The eHLQ was translated using a systematic approach with forward translation, an item intent matrix, back translation, and consensus meetings with the developer. A validity-driven and multi-study approach was used to collect validity evidence on 1) test content, 2) response processes and 3) internal structure. Cognitive interviews (n = 14) were held to assess test content and response processes (Study 1). A pre-final eHLQ version was completed by 1650 people participating in an eHealth study (Study 2). A seven-factor Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model was fitted to the data to assess the internal structure of the eHLQ. Invariance testing was performed across gender, age, education and current diagnosis. Results: Cognitive interviews showed some problems in wording, phrasing and resonance with individual's world views. CFA demonstrated an equivalent internal structure to the hypothesized (original) eHLQ with acceptable fit indices. All items loaded substantially on their corresponding latent factors (range 0.51-0.81). The model was partially metric invariant across all subgroups. Comparison of scores between groups showed that people who were younger, higher educated and who had a current diagnosis generally scored higher across domains, however effect sizes were small. Data from both studies were triangulated, resulting in minor refinements to eight items and recommendations on use, score interpretation and reporting. Conclusion: The Dutch version of the eHLQ showed strong properties for assessing eHealth literacy in the Dutch context. While ongoing collection of validity evidence is recommended, the evidence presented indicate that the eHLQ can be used by researchers, eHealth developers and policy makers to identify eHealth literacy needs and inform the development of eHealth interventions to ensure that people with limited digital access and skills are not left behind.

Assessing the experience of person‐centred coordinated care of people with chronic conditions in the Netherlands: Validation of the Dutch P3CEQ

Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire

Person-Centered Coordinated Care Experience of People With Long-Term Conditions in the Balearic Islands Measured by the P3CEQ

Validation of the Psychological Empowerment Scale and Client-Centered Care Questionnaire in budget holders with disabilities

Understanding social dynamics and patient experience in out of hospital care: validation of a co-responsibility questionnaire (CoReCare)

Person‐centred care in primary care: What works for whom, how and in what circumstances?

Experiences and preliminary effects of the Comprehensive chrOnic caRe outpatiEnt (CORE) clinic for patients with multimorbidity in the hospital setting

Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis

Measuring the work environment among healthcare professionals: Validation of the Dutch version of the Culture of Care Barometer

Development and initial validation of a dual-purpose questionnaire capturing mentors’ and mentees’ perceptions and expectations of the mentoring process

Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool in patients with asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: A pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study in the Netherlands

Evaluating person-centered care in neurological outpatient care: a mixed-methods content validity study

Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations

A qualitative evaluation of a comprehensive self-management programme for COPD patients: effectiveness from the patients' perspective

Development and Testing of the Person-Centered Environment and Care Assessment Tool (PCECAT)

Measuring Population Health from a Broader Perspective: Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire

Integrated Care for Frail Elderly: A Qualitative Study of a Promising Approach in The Netherlands

Perceptions of healthcare professional about the "PACE Steps to Success" palliative care program for long-term care: A qualitative study in Switzerland

Translation, cultural adaptation and validity assessment of the Dutch version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: a mixed-method approach

DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION

Patients and informal caregivers in the lead: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals with involvement in treatment, e-health and self-management programs