Mitigation of postoperative urinary retention among total joint replacement patients using the ERAS protocol and applying risk‐stratified catheterization

Hui‐ming Peng,Bing‐du Tong,Ye Li,Wei Wang,Wen‐li Li,Na Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17847
IF: 1.7
2022-06-19
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Reducing in‐hospital complications post TJA is both crucial and urgent in enhancing treatment efficacy and patient experience. Herein, under ERAS protocol, the number of POUR cases that required bladder catheterization was 3.4% for TKA and 10.1% for THA, which is in accordance with other reports. We also found that male gender, advanced age, THA, and SIP‐IBC all significantly elevated POUR development risk. Backgrounds We intended to identify the incidence and risk factors (RFs) for Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after applying a risk‐stratified catheterization optimization method in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)‐total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods A total of 381 patients were prospectively monitored for POUR. POUR diagnosis was done by a perioperative specialist. Data on potential risk factors (RFs) for POUR were accumulated. Univariate analysis (UA) was conducted to identify possible indicators of POUR, followed by multivariate analysis (MA) of identified indicators. Results POUR occurred in 5.5% of cases, including 8 (3.4%) patients underwent total knee arthroplasty and 13 (10.4%) patients underwent total hip arthroplasty. In UA, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and the type of operation were significantly different on UA (P = 0.046, P = 0.022, P = 0.000 and P = 0.049, respectively). Other additional predictors, including body mass index (BMI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) score, preoperative haemoglobin (Hb), duration of operation, estimated intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluid volume, fluid infusion volume within 24 h postoperatively were not associated with POUR (P > 0.05). MA results demonstrated that age, ASA score, type of operation and standard intraoperative placement of an indwelling bladder catheter (SIP‐IBC) were strongly associated with POUR development risk (P
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?