Protection Status of a World Cultural Heritage Site Under Tourism Development: Case Study of Shuhe Ancient Town

Bing Li,Zhenpeng Xing,Li Miao,Zhenpeng Xing and Li Miao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/960/3/032101
2020-12-10
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Abstract:In 2019, China joined Italy as the two countries with the most UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Among the Chinese heritage sites, the inhabited ancient towns, called Living Heritage, are the most difficult to protect in the eyes of many scholars. Only two Chinese ancient towns are listed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, including the Old Town of Lijiang in Yunnan province, the most important settlement of the Naxi people. This indicates Lijiang's significance in the protection of China's cultural heritage. As one of three heritage sites within Lijiang Old Town itself, Shuhe is a pilot site for tourist development and heritage protection, led by the local government. In contrast to the Model of Dayan, the largest area and the earliest tourist development heritage site in Lijiang Old Town, Shuhe was renovated and modernised by a real estate company under the official guidance of the Lijiang government. This model was created to solve the contradiction between local development and cultural heritage protection in Shuhe. Since its renovation 17 years ago, the model of Shuhe has typical Chinese characteristics and has been a great influence on many other historical cities in China. After nearly 20 years of follow-up research, this study combs the development history of Shuhe Ancient Town, by analysing examples of architectural heritage transformation, and further reflects on the root causes of Shuhe development from the perspective of laws and regulations. The rapid development of tourism has become means for the local government and the people to lift themselves out of poverty at the cost of their historical heritage. The development of tourism has brought immediate economic benefits to the local government, developers, outside operators and local habitants in Lijiang. However, the original Naxi habitants have left their historic settlement, and the profound changes to the Naxi living environment have caused the Shuhe world heritage site to lose its original significance. In the renovation of heritage buildings, architects and craftsmen are not responsible for the modification of the historical heritage but are only tools for local governments, developers and outsider operators to gain wealth. The defects, backwardness and inability to fully implement the laws and regulations on heritage protection are the fundamental causes of Shuhe's problems, which reflect the huge gap between the administrators' awareness of heritage protection and the requirements of the professional guidelines of the UNESCO for the world cultural heritage protection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the protection status of Shuhe Ancient Town, a world cultural heritage site, in the context of tourism development. Specifically, by analyzing the changes in Shuhe Ancient Town during the development of tourism and conducting in - depth reflection on the transformation of residential areas, the paper reveals the challenges and problems brought to the local cultural heritage protection by the rapid development of tourism. The paper pays special attention to the development experience of the Shuhe model and its impact on other Chinese historical towns, and explores the root causes of the problems existing in the tourism development of Shuhe Ancient Town from the perspective of laws and regulations. The paper points out that although the development of tourism has brought significant economic benefits to the local government and people, this process has also led to the loss of the original inhabitants and the change of the unique living environment of the Naxi ethnic group, thus making Shuhe, as a world cultural heritage site, lose its original meaning. In addition, the author also points out that the defects in heritage protection regulations and the ineffective implementation are the fundamental reasons for these problems.