One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures. Letter.

N. Fujita-Rohwerder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002426

2022-01-12

Abstract:Journal of Urology, Ahead of Print.

urology & nephrology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures. Reply.

Sean P. Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002427

2022-01-12

Abstract:" One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures. Reply. ." The Journal of Urology , Publish Ahead of Print, pp. – © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.

urology & nephrology
One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume® Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures

Sean P Elliott,Karl Coutinho,Kaiser J Robertson,Richard D'Anna,Kent Chevli,Serge Carrier,Melanie Aube-Peterkin,Christopher H Cantrill,Michael J Ehlert,Alexis E Te,Jeffrey Dann,Jessica M DeLong,Steven B Brandes,Judith C Hagedorn,Richard Levin,Amy Schlaifer,Euclid DeSouza,David DiMarco,Brad A Erickson,Richard Natale,Douglas A Husmann,Allen Morey,Carl Olsson,Ramón Virasoro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002346

Abstract:Purpose: The Optilume® drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a urethral dilation balloon with a paclitaxel coating that combines mechanical dilation for immediate symptomatic relief with local drug delivery to maintain urethral patency. The ROBUST III study is a randomized, single-blind trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume DCB against endoscopic management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures. Materials and methods: Eligible patients were adult males with anterior strictures ≤12Fr in diameter and ≤3 cm in length, at least 2 prior endoscopic treatments, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥11 and maximum flow rate <15 ml per second. A total of 127 subjects were enrolled at 22 sites. The primary study end point was anatomical success (≥14Fr by cystoscopy or calibration) at 6 months. Key secondary end points included freedom from repeat treatment, International Prostatic Symptom Score and peak flow rate. The primary safety end point included freedom from serious device- or procedure-related complications. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with subjects having an average of 3.6 prior treatments and average length of 1.7 cm. Anatomical success for Optilume DCB was significantly higher than control at 6 months (75% vs 27%, p <0.001). Freedom from repeat intervention was significantly higher in the Optilume DCB arm. Immediate symptom and urinary flow rate improvement was significant in both groups, with the benefit being more durable in the Optilume DCB group. The most frequent adverse events included urinary tract infection, post-procedural hematuria and dysuria. Conclusions: The results of this randomized controlled trial support that Optilume is safe and superior to standard direct vision internal urethrotomy/dilation for the treatment of recurrent anterior urethral strictures <3 cm in length. The Optilume DCB may serve as an important alternative for men who have had an unsuccessful direct vision internal urethrotomy/dilation but want to avoid or delay urethroplasty.
Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial

Maia E VanDyke,Allen F Morey,Karl Coutinho,Kaiser J Robertson,Richard D'Anna,Kent Chevli,Christopher H Cantrill,Michael J Ehlert,Alexis E Te,Jeffrey Dann,Jessica M DeLong,Ramón Virasoro,Judith C Hagedorn,Richard Levin,Euclid DeSouza,David DiMarco,Brad A Erickson,Carl Olsson,Sean P Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.312

2023-12-18

BJUI Compass

Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study is to report the updated 2-year results of the intervention arm of the ROBUST III randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus standard endoscopic management of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture. Materials and methods: Eligible patients included men with recurrent anterior urethral stricture ≤3 cm in length and ≤12Fr in diameter, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥11 and peak flow rate (Qmax) <15 mL/s. Patients were randomized to treatment with the Optilume DCB or standard-of-care endoscopic management. Primary efficacy endpoints measured at 2 years included freedom from re-intervention and changes in IPSS, Qmax and post-void residual (PVR). Secondary endpoint was impact on sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 127 patients enrolled at 22 sites in the United States and Canada (48 randomized to standard-of-care dilation and 79 to DCB dilation). Seventy-five patients in the DCB arm entered the open-label phase after 6 months. Participants averaged 3.2 prior endoscopic interventions (range 2-10); most (89.9%) had bulbar strictures with an average stricture length of 1.63 cm (SD 0.76). Significant improvements in IPSS, average Qmax and PVR were maintained at 2 years. Freedom from repeat intervention was significantly higher in the Optilume DCB arm at 2 years versus the Control arm at 1 year (77.8% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were 15 treatment failures and two non-study-related deaths. Treatment-related AEs were rare and generally self-limited (haematuria, dysuria and urinary tract infection). Conclusion: The Optilume DCB shows sustained improvement in both objective and subjective voiding parameters at 2-year follow-up. Optilume appears to provide a safe and effective endoscopic treatment alternative for short recurrent anterior urethral strictures among men who wish to avoid or delay formal urethroplasty.
(064) The Optilume® Drug Coated Balloon for Recurrent Anterior Urethral Strictures: Robust III Study 3-year Interim Results

A Krug,A Morey,K Coutinho,K Robertson,R D'anna,K Chevli,SC Carrier,C Cantrill,MJ Ehlert,AE Te,J Dann,JM Delong,SB Brandes,J Hagedorn,R Levin,A Schlaifer,E Desouza,D Dimarco,B Erickson,S Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.060

2024-02-07

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction The Optilume® Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) is a dilation balloon with a paclitaxel coating that combines mechanical dilation for immediate symptomatic relief with local drug delivery to maintain urethral patency. Outcomes after 3-year follow-up are presented here. Objective The ROBUST III study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the Optilume® Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) against direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) or dilation. Methods 127 subjects were randomized in a 2:1 fashion at 23 sites. Seventy-nine were treated with the DCB and 48 were treated with DVIU or dilation. Follow-up past 1 year was limited to those treated with the DCB. Eligibility criteria included adult males with anterior strictures with ≥2 prior treatments and stricture length ≤3cm. Long-term endpoints included freedom from repeat treatment, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and peak urinary flow rate (Qmax). Results Subjects randomized to receive the DCB had an average of 3.2 prior treatments and average stricture length of 1.6cm (46% ≥2cm), with 8/79 (10.1%) having penile strictures and 9/79 (11.4%) having prior pelvic radiation. IPSS significantly improved from 22.0 at baseline to 11.3 at 3 years. Qmax significantly improved from a baseline of 7.7 mL/sec to 12.2 mL/sec at 3 years. Freedom from repeat intervention for DCB subjects was estimated to be 74%. No late-onset treatment related adverse events were observed. Conclusions The Optilume® DCB continues to achieve significant improvements in symptoms, flow, and reintervention rates through 3 years post treatment. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
High-pressure Balloon Dilation for Male Anterior Urethral Stricture: Single-Center Experience

Shi-cheng Yu,Hai-yang Wu,Wei Wang,Li-wei Xu,Guo-qing Ding,Zhi-gen Zhang,Gong-hui Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b1600096

2016-01-01

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B

Abstract:OBJECTIVES:We retrospectively reviewed the urethral stricture cases treated in our tertiary center, and assessed the safety and feasibility of the high-pressure balloon dilation (HPBD) technique for anterior urethral stricture.METHODS:From January 2009 to December 2012, a total of 31 patients with anterior urethral strictures underwent HPBD at our center, while another 25 cases were treated by direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU). Patient demographics, stricture characteristics, surgical techniques, and operative outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to evaluate the stricture-free rate for the two surgical techniques.RESULTS:The operation time was much shorter for the HPBD procedure than for the DVIU ((13.19±2.68) min vs. (18.44±3.29) min, P<0.01). For the HPBD group, the major postoperative complications as urethral bleeding and urinary tract infection (UTI) were less frequently encountered than those in DVIU (urethral bleeding: 2/31 vs. 8/25, P=0.017; UTI: 1/31 vs. 6/25 P=0.037). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in stricture-free rate at 36 months between the two groups (P=0.21, hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34 to 1.26). However, there was a significantly higher stricture-free survival in the HPBD group at 12 months (P=0.02, HR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.87), which indicated that the stricture recurrence could be delayed by using the HPBD technique.CONCLUSIONS:HPBD was effective and safe and it could be considered as an alternative treatment modality for anterior urethral stricture disease.
Long-Term Outcomes of Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture Treatment With the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon: 5-year Results From the ROBUST I Study

Jessica DeLong,Ramón Virasoro,Merycarla Pichardo,Rafael Estrella,Ramón Rodríguez Lay,Gustavo Espino,Sean Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004229

2024-08-30

Abstract:Purpose: To report the 5-year study close-out results for the ROBUST I trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) for men with short, recurrent bulbar urethral strictures. Materials and methods: Adult men with recurrent bulbar urethral strictures ≤ 2 cm long and lumen < 12 Fr were included in the study and treated with the Optilume DCB. Outcome measures included symptom questionnaires, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post void residual (PVR), and freedom from repeat intervention. Functional success was defined as improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥ 50% without retreatment. Results: Fifty-three men were enrolled and treated, and 31 subjects completed all follow-up. Functional success was achieved in 58% (25/43) patients at 5 years. Average IPSS improved from a mean of 25.2 at baseline to 7.2 at 5 years (P < .001). Freedom from repeat intervention was maintained through 5 years at 71.7% estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Qmax improved from 5.0 mL/s at baseline to 19.9 (P < .01) and average PVR was reduced from 141.4 mL to 59.5 mL (P < .01) at 5 years follow up. Erectile function remained unaffected. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: In this challenging cohort of men with failed prior endoscopic treatment, the Optilume DCB shows sustained improvement in subjective and objective voiding parameters at 5 years. Optilume is a safe and effective treatment option for appropriately selected men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture who wish to avoid urethroplasty. Results are in line with the ROBUST III randomized controlled trial that will continue follow-up through 5 years.
A Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Stricture Disease: Three-Year Results from the ROBUST I Study

Ramón Virasoro,Jessica M DeLong,Rafael E Estrella,Merycarla Pichardo,Ramón Rodriguez Lay,Gustavo Espino,Sean P Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S359872

2022-05-06

Research and Reports in Urology

Abstract:Ramón Virasoro, 1 Jessica M DeLong, 1 Rafael E Estrella, 2 Merycarla Pichardo, 3 Ramón Rodriguez Lay, 4 Gustavo Espino, 5 Sean P Elliott 6 1 Urology of Virginia PLLC, Virginia Beach, VA, USA; 2 Clinica Unión Medica, Santiago de los Caballeros, Dominican Republic; 3 URUS, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; 4 Cirujano Urologo Royal Center Panama City, Panama City, Panama; 5 Centro Especializado San Fernando, Panama City, Panama; 6 Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Correspondence: Ramón Virasoro, Urology of Virginia PLLC, 225 Clearfield Ave, Virginia Beach, VA, 23462, USA, Tel +1 757-457-5100, Email Introduction: Endoscopic management of male anterior urethral stricture disease is common; however, repeat treatment is associated with high recurrence rates. Here, we report the 3-year results of the ROBUST I trial, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Optilume ® drug coated balloon (DCB) in men with recurrent urethral strictures. Methods: Adult men with recurrent bulbar urethral strictures ≤ 2 cm in length and 1– 4 prior endoscopic interventions were treated with the Optilume DCB. Functional success was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) without need for retreatment. Other outcomes included quality of life, maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine volume, erectile function, and freedom from repeat intervention. Results: Of the 53 enrolled and treated men, 33 completed the 3-year visit, with 10 patients experiencing clinical failures at previous visits, giving a total of 43 subjects evaluable for the functional success endpoint. Functional success was achieved in 67% (29/43) and freedom from retreatment in 77% (33/43). Average IPSS improved from 25.2 at baseline to 5.5 at 3 years (p< 0.0001). Significant improvements were observed in quality of life, flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume. Erectile function was not affected by treatment. Device-related adverse events were mild or moderate in nature and resolved quickly after onset. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: Symptomatic improvement after treatment with the Optilume DCB was maintained through 3 years in a population highly susceptible to recurrent urethral stricture disease. This minimally invasive therapy is safe with no negative impact on sexual function. Keywords: lower urinary tract symptoms, paclitaxel, urethral dilation, medical device, clinical trial The treatment of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture disease remains a common and challenging problem for many urologists across the globe. Current available options for recurrent urethral strictures include endoscopic management and urethral reconstruction. While open repair is considered the gold standard, with success rates of 80–95%, minimally invasive therapies are still more frequently used. 1 Of the primary endoscopic procedures, urethral dilation and Direct Vision Internal Urethrotomy (DVIU) have similar efficacy, with progressively lower probability of long-term success in repeat treatments. 2,3 More recently, small studies have evaluated targeted injections of antifibrotic agents as an adjunctive therapy to endoscopic procedures in an attempt to prevent or attenuate scar tissue formation. 4 The Optilume ® Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) (Urotronic, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) is the first DCB intended for the treatment of male anterior urethral strictures. This technology aims to provide immediate symptomatic relief by widening the urethral lumen using balloon dilation, while maintaining long-term urethral patency via the circumferential and local application of paclitaxel. Paclitaxel is an antimitotic agent that inhibits cell proliferation and migration and has been used extensively in cardiovascular interventions to prevent restenosis after angioplasty. 5,6 We previously reported the 1- and 2-year ROBUST I trial results, which evaluated the Optilume ® DCB in men with recurrent urethral strictures up to 2 cm in length. 7,8 Anatomic success in ROBUST I was achieved in 70% at 1 year based on the ability to pass a 16F flexible cystoscope or 14F Foley catheter. 7 Based on the study design, cystoscopy was not performed after 1 year, however functional success occurred in 70% (32/46) at 2 years, defined as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improvement ≥50% in the absence of retreatment need. 8 We now report the 3-year safety and efficacy outcomes of the ROBUST I trial. ROBUST I is a prospective, multicenter, single arm, open-label study evaluating the -Abstract Truncated-
Optilume® Drug-Coated Balloon May Lower the Re-Treatment Rate Postintervention for Challenging Urethral Stricture Disease in Long-Term Follow-Up: A Prospective Cohort Study

Zein Alhamdani,Sean Ong,Wenjie Zhong,Peter Chin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0318

2024-09-23

Abstract:Background: Urethral stricture disease is a common and at times unsatisfying condition that can lead to complications severely impacting a patient's quality of life (QOL). Open urethroplasty remains the gold standard treatment, however it is an invasive and highly specialized procedure. Strictures between 2 and 4 cm in length have been shown to recur at a rate of 50% within 12 months, a rate that typically decreases with each subsequent treatment. The Laborie Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) is the first of its kind developed for adjunct treatment of urethral strictures in men. The DCB initially treats the stricture through balloon dilatation and subsequently aims to prevent recurrence via the localized application of Paclitaxel. Our study assesses the safety and efficacy of the DCB in an Australian population with strictures exceeding 2 cm, who have undergone at least two prior procedures for urethral stricture disease. Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited from November 2019 to September 2021. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS QOL, and voiding parameters were collected at baseline, and again at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months. The DCB was applied by a single consultant urologist under rigid cystoscope with shallow direct vision internal urethrotomy with a cold knife prior to application of the DCB. Results: Seventeen patients were recruited with an average of 7.7 prior urethral procedures for recurrent stricture disease. In total, 76% were stricture free at 30 months follow-up. There were improvements in almost all parameters including max flow, average flow, IPSS, and IPSS QOL scores at 12 and 24 months. There were no complications. Conclusion: The DCB is a safe and effective method at reducing the rates of recurrence for high-risk stricture disease and can delay or prevent the need for urethroplasty in what remains a very challenging cohort of patients.
A randomized comparison of healing response of the BuMA Supreme stent and Xience stent at one- and two-month follow-up: PIONEER-II OCT randomized controlled trial.

Taku Asano,Qinhua Jin,Yuki Katagiri,Norihiro Kogame,Kuniaki Takahashi,Chun-Chin Chang,Ply Chichareon,ChangQian Wang,Bei Shi,Xi Su,Guosheng Fu,YanQing Wu,XuChen Zhou,Zuyi Yuan,Joanna J Wykrzykowska,Jan J Piek,Patrick W Serruys,Yoshinobu Onuma,YunDai Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00461

2018-01-01

EuroIntervention

Abstract:Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the strut coverage of the XIENCE stent with that of the BuMA Supreme sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent, which has a shorter drug elution, on optical coherence tomography (OCT) one or two months after implantation. Methods and results: The PIONEER-II OCT trial was a multicentre, two-arm randomised trial, which comprised two cohorts: cohort-1 underwent an OCT imaging one month after coronary intervention (BuMA: 16 patients with 18 lesions, XIENCE: 15 patients with 17 lesions), whereas cohort-2 underwent OCT at two months (BuMA: 21 patients with 21 lesions, XIENCE: 23 patients with 28 lesions). The primary hypotheses were non-inferiority of the BuMA stent to the XIENCE stent in percent strut coverage at one month (cohort-1) or two months (cohort-2). In cohort-1, the BuMA stent was non-inferior to the XIENCE stent in terms of the strut coverage (83.8 +/- 10.4% for BuMA vs. 73.0 +/- 17.5% for XIENCE, p(for noninferiority) <0.001), and was also significantly higher than the XIENCE (p(for superiority) 0.037). In cohort-2, the BuMA stent was non-inferior to the XIENCE stent in OCT strut coverage (80.3 +/- 18.3% vs. 73.3 +/- 21.3%, p(for noninferiority) 0.006, p(for superiority) 0.24). Healing scores showed better healing in the BuMA stent in cohort-1 (32.36 +/- 21.59 vs. 54.88 +/- 34.65, p=0.027), whereas there was comparable healing between the BuMA and XIENCE stents in cohort-2 (39.86 +/- 37.77 vs. 53.75 +/- 42.84, p=0.25). Conclusions: The BuMA Supreme had a faster coverage than the XIENCE at one month, presumably due to faster and shorter sirolimus elution. The difference in tissue coverage became less evident at two months.
A single-institution experience with the Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon for management of urethral stricture disease

Ashorne K Mahenthiran,Ramzy T Burns,Mary E Soyster,Morgan Black,Peter J Arnold,Harrison L Love,Matthew J Mellon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-104

2024-08-31

Abstract:Background: Urethral stricture disease is detrimental to quality of life. The Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) offers a solution utilizing a paclitaxel-coated balloon to expand strictures and prevent recurrence. Following the ROBUST trials, it has been proposed that DCB is more effective than conventional endoscopic management for recurrent, small anterior urethral strictures. Our study provides insights into practical applications and outcomes using DCB for urethral stricture disease. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent DCB for urethral strictures at our institution from November 2022 to August 2023 with follow-up evaluated through January 2024. Demographics, stricture characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Primary endpoint was need for repeat intervention as determined by symptomatic burden and subsequently postoperative post-void residual if obtained. Secondary endpoint was complication rate. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA/BE17.0 software to create Kaplan-Meier curves for time to repeat intervention after treatment with DCB. Results: Of 43 patients, 16 had no prior treatment. The other 27 had endoscopic treatment and of this group, 11 also had additional urethroplasty. Stricture etiologies included 20 iatrogenic, 14 idiopathic, 5 radiation-related, 2 inflammatory, and 2 traumatic. Stricture locations were 2 fossa navicularis, 7 pendulous, 17 bulbar, 7 membranous, 3 prostatic, and 7 bladder neck contractures. Mean balloon dilation lasted 8.4±2.7 minutes. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 150 days postoperatively and the mean duration of follow-up for the cohort was 290.3±87.0 days. The average postoperative post-void residual was 33.4±90.6 milliliters. Two patients had immediate complications: 1 with urinary retention after catheter removal requiring suprapubic tube placement and 1 with urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics. Four patients required repeat interventions: 1 endoscopic dilation, 1 graft urethroplasty, and 2 repeat DCB procedures. Mean time to repeat intervention was 203.5±82.6 days, and no patient required repeat intervention within 145 days of initial surgery. Conclusions: DCB offers a safe and less invasive treatment for both treatment-naïve and recurrent urethral strictures with paclitaxel coating to prevent recurrence. Repeat intervention was not required for 90.7% of our cohort within an average follow-up duration of 9 months postoperatively. As DCB grows in clinical use, investigation into its long-term efficacy is justified.
Long-term outcomes after treatment with Optilume BPH

Steven A. Kaplan,Merycarla Pichardo,Edwin Rijo,Gustavo Espino,Ramon Rodriguez Lay,Rafael Estrella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8737

2024-06-17

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Abstract:Introduction: The purpose of this study was to gather initial safety and efficacy data with the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: A total of 80 men with moderate-to-severe LUTS secondary to BPH were enrolled and treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System. Symptoms were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII). Improvement in urinary flow and relief of obstruction was evaluated by way of peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR). Subjects were prospectively queried for adverse events at each study visit, and relatedness to the study device were evaluated by the investigators, as well as centrally adjudicated by the study principal investigator. Results: Previous reports of symptom improvement in this cohort were maintained through four-year followup, with a significant reduction in IPSS and IPSS quality of life maintained through four years (-12.1, -2.8, respectively). Clinically meaningful improvement in Qmax was maintained in the majority of subjects, with an average improvement from baseline of +5.6 mL/sec. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in the long-term followup period. Conclusions: Long-term followup through four years for subjects treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System indicates durable outcomes in symptom improvement and functional improvement in flow rate. These results indicate the unique mechanism of action for Optilume BPH successfully achieves an immediate mechanical effect that is maintained long-term through incorporation of paclitaxel to maintain patency.

urology & nephrology
The PINNACLE Study: A Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Steven A. Kaplan,Jared Moss,Sheldon Freedman,Karl Coutinho,Ning Wu,Mitchell Efros,Dean Elterman,Richard D’Anna,Osvaldo Padron,Kaiser J. Robertson,Samuel Lawindy,Sandeep Mistry,Neal Shore,Jeffrey Spier,Jed Kaminetsky,Brian Mazzarella,David Cahn,Mark Jalkut,Alexis Te

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003568

2023-09-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: The Optilume BPH Catheter System is a novel drug/device combination minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Optilume BPH against a sham surgical procedure.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were men 50 years or older with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and a prostate size between 20 and 80 g. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive treatment with Optilume BPH or a sham surgical procedure. Blinding was maintained for subjects in both arms and evaluating personnel through 1 year postprocedure. Follow-up assessments included the International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, and other quality-of-life and sexual function assessments.RESULTS: A total of 148 men were randomized (100 active, 48 sham) at 18 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Subjects randomized to receive Optilume BPH saw a reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score of 11.5±7.8 points at 1 year posttreatment, as compared to a reduction of 8.0±8.3 points at 3 months in the sham arm. Flow rate was dramatically improved after treatment with Optilume BPH, with an improvement of +10.3 mL/s from baseline to 1 year (+125%).CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Optilume BPH provides immediate and sustained improvements in obstructive symptoms and flow rate while preserving erectile and ejaculatory function. Treatment is well tolerated and can be done in an office or ambulatory setting.

urology & nephrology
(122) Preservation of Sexual Function: 12-month Outcomes from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH System, a Novel Drug Coated Balloon

K Mcvary,O Padron,J Kaminetsy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.116

2024-02-01

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Many front-line treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), such as medications and transurethral resection of the prostate, have well established negative effects on sexual function. New minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for LUTS/BPH need to preserve sexual function to meet the needs of men. Data from the randomized controlled blinded study of the Optilume BPH System was analyzed to evaluate the sexual side effects of this novel treatment. Objective The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study evaluating the Optilume BPH System. Optilume BPH is a novel MIST that combines mechanical dilation with delivery of paclitaxel for treatment of LUTS/BPH. The mechanical dilation with Optilume BPH achieves an anterior commissurotomy, while delivery of paclitaxel is intended to maintain luminal patency during healing, while preserving sexual function. Methods 148 subjects with symptomatic LUTS/BPH and a prostate size between 20-80 grams were randomized in a 2:1 fashion (Optilume to Sham) at 18 centers in the US and Canada. Follow-up is complete through 12-months. To evaluate the effect of the treatment on sexual function, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) questionnaires were used. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 3, 6, and 12-months post procedure, regardless of sexual activity at baseline. A sub-set of 15 non-randomized subjects treated with Optilume BPH underwent further testing for semen quality and measurement of the amount of paclitaxel found in semen post-treatment. Results The average IIEF-EF score at baseline was 15-16 for both arms, mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (Figure 1). Scores across all domains improved slightly from baseline through 12 months, indicating that treatment with the Optilume BPH device had no significant impact on perceived sexual function. This finding is consistent when looking at men who were sexually active at baseline (Figure 2). Ejaculatory function also showed slight improvement from baseline to 12 months in both the overall population and the subset of men who were sexually active at baseline (Figure 1, Figure 2). There is no appreciable change in ejaculation bother from baseline to 12-months in the overall population and the sexually active subset (Figure 1, Figure 2). Overall semen quality parameters did not change post-procedure (Table 1). A slight decrease in sperm concentration was noted post-treatment, although this decrease was not significant at the 3- and 6-month timepoints. Paclitaxel was detected in semen in the majority of subjects tested at 30 days and 3 months post-procedure. The paclitaxel concentration in semen steadily decreased over time, nearing the limit of quantitation of the method by 6 months post-procedure. Conclusions Treatment with Optilume BPH preserved erectile and ejaculatory function. IIEF and MSHQ-EjD scores were not different from control at any time point. New MISTs for LUTS/BPH need to preserve sexual function to meet the needs of men and Optilume appears to meet this objective. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Urotronic. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Urotronic.

urology & nephrology
How I Do It: The Optilume drug-coated balloon for urethral strictures

Dean S Elterman,Karl Coutinho,Judith C Hagedorn

Abstract:Urethral stricture disease can be difficult to treat and stricture recurrence is common. The management of stricture disease has evolved and urethroplasty can achieve a high rate of lasting urethral patency. Nevertheless, endoscopic treatments still seem to have sub-optimal outcomes with high stricture recurrence rates. The Optilume drug-coated balloon represents a step forward in the endoscopic management of urethral strictures. The drug-coated balloon may offer an intermediate step prior to repeated dilations, urethrostomies, or urethroplasty. This treatment modality is a promising alternative to current endoscopic management and an option for patients that are poor surgical candidates or decline urethroplasty.
Economic evaluation of Optilume, a drug-coated balloon for recurrent anterior male urethral stricture

Laura Kelly,Judith Shore,James Wright,Craig Patrick,Hayden Holmes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.241

2023-04-10

BJUI Compass

Abstract:Objectives: We aim to conduct an economic evaluation of the Optilume urethral drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with endoscopic management for the treatment of recurrent anterior male urethral stricture in England. Patients and methods: A cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and savings to the NHS over a 5-year time horizon of adopting Optilume for the treatment of anterior urethral male stricture versus current endoscopic standard of care. A scenario analysis was conducted which compared Optilume to urethroplasty. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate the impact of uncertainties in model parameters. Results: When compared with current endoscopic standard of care Optilume resulted in an estimated cost saving of £2502 per patient if introduced in the NHS for the treatment of recurrent anterior male urethral stricture. In the scenario analysis, the use of Optilume compared with urethroplasty resulted in an estimated cost saving of £243. Results were robust to changes in individual input parameters as demonstrated in the deterministic sensitivity analyses, with the monthly probability of symptom recurrence associated with endoscopic management the only exception. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that Optilume was cost saving in 93.4% of model iterations, when running 1000 iterations. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that the Optilume urethral DCB treatment can be a cost-saving alternative management option for the treatment of recurrent anterior male urethral stricture within the NHS in England.
A critical evaluation of Optilume® BPH as a novel minimally invasive surgical treatment for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men

David C. Chen,Alice Thomson,Siyu Huang,Declan G. Murphy,Damien Bolton,Nathan Lawrentschuk,Marlon L. Perera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-578

2024-04-20

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:David C. Chen 1,2,3,4 , Alice Thomson 1,4 , Siyu Huang 1,4 , Declan G. Murphy 1,4 , Damien Bolton 2,4 , Nathan Lawrentschuk 1,4,5 , Marlon L. Perera 1,2,4,5 1 Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2 Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3 Young Urological Researchers Organisation, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; 4 Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 5 Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Comment on: Kaplan SA, Moss J, Freedman S, et al . The PINNACLE Study: A Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol 2023;210:500-9. Keywords: Prostate; benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH); Optilume ® BPH; minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) Submitted Nov 13, 2023. Accepted for publication Feb 08, 2024. Published online Apr 11, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-578 The prospective, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PINNACLE study assessed the safety and efficacy of Optilume ® BPH (Urotonic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) compared to a sham procedure in 148 men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as characterised by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥13 and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) between 5–12 mL/s (1). Full inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1 . IPSS, International Prostate Symptoms Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; UTI, urinary tract infection. Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive Optilume BPH (n=100) or the sham therapy (n=48), stratified by centre and IPSS severity (≤19 or >19). Baseline characteristics were comparable across both groups. A maximum follow-up of 12 months was planned but was discontinued in patients who received additional BPH treatment if lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) continued. Patients randomised to the sham arm were permitted to cross over to receive treatment with Optilume BPH after the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was improvement in IPSS from baseline to 3 months in the sham arm against improvement from baseline to 1 year in the Optilume BPH arm. Optilume BPH combines anterior commissurotomy and simultaneous delivery of paclitaxel to prostatic adenoma in aim to create long-lasting channel patency in an ambulatory surgical setting. Prior to the procedure, prostatic urethral lengths are measured by transrectal ultrasound, with the intention to precisely select 1 of 4 drug-coated balloons (DCB) for each individual. Patients can receive general or local anaesthesia, in conjunction with oral sedation and local lubrication. Once the patient is draped and placed in a lithotomy position, cystoscopy is performed with a 20-Fr rigid cystoscope. First, a pre-dilatation balloon with a diameter of up to 90 Fr is inserted under direct vision and inflated for 5 minutes, and then removed. Then, a DCB catheter is inserted and inflated for 10 minutes, to deliver paclitaxel to the prostatic adenoma via the anterior commissurotomy. A 22–24-Fr 3 way in-dwelling catheter is placed, and continuous bladder irrigation is run for 30 minutes. The in-dwelling catheter remained in situ for 2 days postoperatively for both treatment arms. The trial reported positive efficacy results, meeting the primary outcome. Patients receiving Optilume BPH had a significantly greater IPSS improvement at 12 months (−11.5±7.8) compared to patients in the sham arm at 3 months (−8.0±8.3), however appeared insignificant when a 25% super-superiority margin (P=0.18) was assessed. Significantly more patients received an IPSS improvement ≥30% in the Optilume BPH arm compared to the sham arm [66/96 (68.8%) vs. 25/48 (52.1%), P=0.003]. Qmax improvement at 12 months compared to baseline was significantly more evident in patients receiving Optilume BPH over sham at 3 months (+9.7±10.1 vs. +5.5±7.4 mL/s, P=0.009). Between 3 and 6 months, one patient in the Optilume arm received BPH medication and one was lost to follow-up. In the control arm, 11 patients underwent a surgical procedure and one commenced BPH medication. Four patients from the Optilume BPH arm went on to have medical or surgical management of BPH, whereas 22—or almost half—of patients in the sham arm had either medical or surgical management of BPH during the follow-up window. Four patients (4%) had haematuria directly resulting from Optilume BPH that required further cystoscopic management. A false -Abstract Truncated-

urology & nephrology,andrology
(362) Stress Urinary Incontinence Rates in Men Undergoing Optilume Balloon Dilation for Radiation-Induced Posterior Urethral Stenosis: A Single Center Experience

B Ceballos,L Shumaker,JP Selph,A Baumgarten

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.347

2024-02-07

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction While radiation can be a viable treatment option for prostate cancer, development of radiation-induced urethral stenosis occurs in approximately 2% of patients. Optilume, a paclitaxel-coated urethral dilation balloon was FDA approved in 2021 and has shown improved urethral patency and reduced rates of reintervention for anterior urethral strictures relative to standard endoscopic procedures. As the utility of Optilume expands into posterior urethral stenosis, it is important to identify the associated potential complications. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been reported to be as high as 33% following urethroplasty for patients with radiation-induced urethral stenoses. Rates of SUI following Optilume balloon dilation have yet to be evaluated in this high-risk population. Objective To evaluate rates of SUI in patients undergoing Optilume balloon dilation for radiation-induced posterior urethral stenosis. Methods From March 2022 to February 2023, select men with radiation-induced posterior urethral stenoses underwent Optilume balloon dilation. Initial evaluation included retrograde urethrogram and/or diagnostic cystoscopy. Dilation was performed with a 30-French Optilume and left inflated for five minutes per standard protocol. A 16-French catheter was inserted and left in place for three to five days. Patients were scheduled for a three-month post-dilation cystoscopy. Pre- and post-dilation continence rates were compared. Results A total of 16 men with confirmed radiation-induced posterior urethral stenoses underwent Optilume balloon dilation. Of the 16 patients, 12 patients had documentation regarding their pre- and post-treatment continence status. No patients developed de novo SUI. Baseline pre-treatment SUI was noted in one patient (8.3%) requiring an average of 4 Depends per day. This patient noted no change in his degree of SUI following Optilume dilation and the dilation site was found to be widely patent on his follow up cystoscopy. He is scheduled for artificial urinary sphincter in the near future. Mean follow up was 77 days (range 30-180 days). Repeat intervention was required in three patients (18.8%) for repeat stenosis. Conclusions Optilume balloon dilation for radiation-induced posterior urethral stenosis does not appear to lead to de novo SUI in short to intermediate term follow up. Further prospective studies with a larger group of patients and longer follow up duration are warranted in this complex population. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Laborie.

urology & nephrology
Long-Term Experience with Balloon Dilation for Short Bulbar and Membranous Urethral Strictures: Establishing a Baseline in the Active Drug Treatment Era

Lauren A Beeder,Grayden S Cook,Samantha W Nealon,Shervin Badkhshan,Sarah C Sanders,Dylan P Perito,Steven J Hudak,Allen F Morey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113095

2022-05-30

Abstract:Transurethral balloon dilation (BD) is a minimally invasive treatment for urethral stricture disease (USD) performed primarily or as a recurrence salvage maneuver. With the introduction of drug-coated balloons, we sought to characterize patient outcomes using non-medicated balloons. A retrospective review identified patients who underwent BD from 2007 to 2021. Patient and stricture characteristics were collected. All dilations employed the 24Fr UroMaxTM system. Clinical failure was defined by patient-reported lower urinary tract symptom recurrence or need for further stricture management. Ninety-one patients underwent BD with follow-up median (IQR) 12 (3-40) months. Most (75/91, 82%) had prior treatment for USD (endoscopic 50/91 (55%), 51/91 (56%) urethroplasty) before BD. Recurrence rates did not significantly differ between treatment-naïve and salvage patients (44% vs. 52% (p = 0.55)). Median (IQR) time to failure was 6 (3-13) months. The most common complications were urinary tract infection (8%) and post-operative urinary retention requiring catheterization (3%). Radiation history was noted in 33/91 (36%) with 45% recurrence. Patients without previous radiation had a similar recurrence rate of 52% (p = 0.88). Balloon dilation had minimal complications and overall, 50% recurrence rate, consistent regardless of stricture characteristics, radiation history, or prior treatments. These results represent an important clinical benchmark for comparing outcomes using drug-coated balloons.
Two-year long-term follow-up of treatment with the Optilume BPH catheter system in a randomized controlled trial for benign prostatic hyperplasia (The PINNACLE Study)

Steven A. Kaplan,Jared L. Moss,Sheldon J. Freedman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00833-z

2024-04-30

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Abstract:Patient outcomes were assessed 2 years after treatment with the Optilume BPH Catheter System, a minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

oncology,urology & nephrology
An Evaluation of Sexual Function in The Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Treated with the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device

Dean Elterman,Mark Alshak,Susana Martinez Diaz,Neal Shore,Marc Gittleman,Jay Motola,Sheldon Pike,Craig Hermann,William Terens,Alfred Kohan,Ricardo Gonzalez,AE Katz,Jeffrey Schiff1,Evan Goldfischer,Ivan Grunberger,Le Mai Tu,Jed Kaminetsky,Bilal Chughtai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0226

2022-09-08

Journal of Endourology

Abstract:Purpose: To document the effect of the temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTind, Olympus, Shinjuku City, Tokyo, Japan) on sexual function from a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. Methods: Men were randomized 2:1 between iTind and sham procedure arms. The iTind was placed for 5-7 days and an 18F Foley catheter was inserted and removed for the iTind and sham group, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline, 3, and 12 months postoperatively using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Unblinding occurred at 3 months. Results: We studied 185 men with a mean age of 61.1 ± 6.5 years. There was no difference in SHIM or total IIEF between iTind and sham at 3 months or in the iTind arm at 12 months compared to baseline. Men in the iTind arm without erectile dysfunction (ED) at baseline also showed an improvement in total IIEF score of +6.07 ± 21.17 points (p=0.034) at 12 months, in addition to an improvement in ejaculatory function. SHIM scores remained unchanged in all groups, regardless of age, prostate volume, or baseline erectile function. Conclusion: No changes were observed in sexual and ejaculatory function of patients with iTind regardless of a man's age, prostate volume, and baseline sexual function.

urology & nephrology

One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures. Letter.

One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures. Reply.

One-Year Results for the ROBUST III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Optilume® Drug-Coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures

Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial

(064) The Optilume® Drug Coated Balloon for Recurrent Anterior Urethral Strictures: Robust III Study 3-year Interim Results

High-pressure Balloon Dilation for Male Anterior Urethral Stricture: Single-Center Experience

Long-Term Outcomes of Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture Treatment With the Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon: 5-year Results From the ROBUST I Study

A Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Stricture Disease: Three-Year Results from the ROBUST I Study

Optilume® Drug-Coated Balloon May Lower the Re-Treatment Rate Postintervention for Challenging Urethral Stricture Disease in Long-Term Follow-Up: A Prospective Cohort Study

A randomized comparison of healing response of the BuMA Supreme stent and Xience stent at one- and two-month follow-up: PIONEER-II OCT randomized controlled trial.

A single-institution experience with the Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon for management of urethral stricture disease

Long-term outcomes after treatment with Optilume BPH

The PINNACLE Study: A Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

(122) Preservation of Sexual Function: 12-month Outcomes from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH System, a Novel Drug Coated Balloon

How I Do It: The Optilume drug-coated balloon for urethral strictures

Economic evaluation of Optilume, a drug-coated balloon for recurrent anterior male urethral stricture

A critical evaluation of Optilume® BPH as a novel minimally invasive surgical treatment for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men

(362) Stress Urinary Incontinence Rates in Men Undergoing Optilume Balloon Dilation for Radiation-Induced Posterior Urethral Stenosis: A Single Center Experience

Long-Term Experience with Balloon Dilation for Short Bulbar and Membranous Urethral Strictures: Establishing a Baseline in the Active Drug Treatment Era

Two-year long-term follow-up of treatment with the Optilume BPH catheter system in a randomized controlled trial for benign prostatic hyperplasia (The PINNACLE Study)

An Evaluation of Sexual Function in The Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Treated with the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device