Abstract:Salivary cortisol (SC) is a measure of free cortisol and follows diurnal rhythm of serum or plasma cortisol, so it is convenient for collection noninvasively on an outpatient basis. The Endocrine Society recommends measuring MiSC concentrations as a first-line test in screening for Cushing's syndrome. To define its utility as a diagnostic test, it is important to know whether assay techniques or thresholds affect the rate of false-positive results. Revision of literature showed that there are marked differences in sensitivity and specificity, and cutoff values of SC assays. The aim of this study was to compare MiSC results obtained by available immunoassays with different analytical sensitivity (AS) in an Argentinian population, and compare by pairs of methods their Diagnostic Concordance (DC) using individual reported cutoffs (RCO). Material and methods: Salivary samples obtained at 11 PM, from 133 adults subjects (18-74 years), with no corticoid therapy (last 6 months), psychiatric medication, depression, thyroid diseases, statins administration, or smoking. MiSC (nmol/L) were measured by ECLIA Cobas Roche (RCO: 4.9; AS: 1.5); RIA Beckman Coulter (RCO: 0.8; AS: 0.8), CLIA Liaison DiaSorin (RCO: 8.0; AS: 4.4), CLIA Access Beckman Coulter (RCO: 8.3; AS: 0.3) and CLIA Immulite 1000 Siemens (modified methodic) (RCO: 5.0 own data not reported; AS: 1.0). Bland & Altman biases were calculated between methods. Results: Calculated median, range and p95 (nmoL/L) for each method were: ECLIA Cobas (n=131): 1.6 (1.5-14.5) 6.4; RIA (n=90): 1.33 (0.8-7.7) 3.6, CLIA Liaison (n=126): 4.4 (8.4-22.1) 8.2, CLIA Access (n= 125): 4.1 (0.3-28) 15.6, and CLIA Immulite1000 (n: 99): 2.5 (1.4-20) 7.6. Calculated p95 was higher than RCO in all methods, being RIA the highest. ANOVA analysis for paired samples measured by all methods showed significant (p<0.005) differences except for Access and Liaison (p=1,000). Biases (nmol/L) obtained were: Cobas vs Immulite = -1; Access vs Cobas = 3.2; Cobas vs Liaison = -2.8; Cobas vs RIA = 0.9; Access vs Immulite = 2.4; Immulite vs Liaison = -1.8; Access vs Liaison = 0.3; Access vs RIA = 4.1; Liaison vs RIA = 3.6; Immulite vs RIA = 1.9. Lowest bias found was between Access and Liaison, result coincident with ANOVA. %DC between pairs of methods using RCOs was: Cobas vs Immulite = 87%; Access vs Cobas= 84%; Cobas vs Liaison = 95%; Cobas vs RIA = 64%; Access vs Immulite = 85%; Immulite vs Liaison = 90%; Access vs Liaison = 84%; Access vs RIA= 72%; Liaison vs RIA = 63%; Immulite vs RIA = 70%. Lowest %DC was found when RIA was involved in the comparison, which could be due to its low AS and RCO that are the same. Conclusions: Differences in %DC observed could be due to not only differences between methods but differences in composition of the population studied. Validating MiSC cutoff values in individual laboratories is important for good clinical use of results in the diagnosis and follow-up of Cushing’s syndrome. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Confounding effects of liquorice, hydrocortisone, and blood contamination on salivary cortisol but not cortisone

Salivary Cortisol Measurement Contamination After Oral Hydrocortisone: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Can Circumvent Confounding Effects of Oral Contraceptives in the Short Synacthen Test

Salivary Cortisol Determination on Smartphone-Based Differential Pulse Voltammetry System

Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression – The value of salivary cortisol and cortisone in assessing hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal recovery

Reference ranges of late-night salivary cortisol and cortisone measured by LC–MS/MS and accuracy for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome

Utility of salivary cortisol and cortisone in the diagnostics of adrenal insufficiency

Exam stress and salivary immunological function

Cortisone in saliva of pigs: validation of a new assay and changes after thermal stress

Diagnostic performance of a newly developed salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement using an LC–MS/MS method with simple and rapid sample preparation

Salivary Cortisol Results Obtainable Within Minutes of Sample Collection Correspond With Traditional Immunoassays

Identification of glycyrrhizin metabolites in humans and of a potential biomarker of liquorice-induced pseudoaldosteronism: a multi-centre cross-sectional study

Comparison of salivary cortisol as measured by different immunoassays and tandem mass spectrometry

Comparative analysis of salivary cortisol measurements using different assay methods in relation to serum-free cortisol measurement

Expanding the use of salivary cortisol as a non-invasive outpatient test in the dynamic evaluation of suspected adrenal insufficiency

Low Urinary Free Cortisol as a Risk Factor for Patients with Variceal Bleeding

An LC-MS/MS-based method for the simultaneous quantification of melatonin, cortisol and cortisone in saliva

Salivary cortisol as a diagnostic tool for Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency: improved screening by an automatic immunoassay

Diurnal and day-to-day biological variation of salivary cortisol and cortisone

SUN-LB061 Midnight Salivary Cortisol (MiSC): Diagnostic Concordance in a Normal Sample Population Using Different Immunoassays

Immunoassay or LC-MS/MS for the measurement of salivary cortisol in children?