Medial retropharyngeal nodal region sparing radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
Yan-Ping Mao,Shun-Xin Wang,Tian-Sheng Gao,Ning Zhang,Xiao-Yu Liang,Fang-Yun Xie,Yuan Zhang,Guan-Qun Zhou,Rui Guo,Wei-Jie Luo,Yong-Jie Li,Shao-Qiang Liang,Li Lin,Wen-Fei Li,Xu Liu,Cheng Xu,Yu-Pei Chen,Jia-Wei Lv,Shao-Hui Huang,Li-Zhi Liu,Ji-Bin Li,Ling-Long Tang,Lei Chen,Ying Sun,Jun Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072133
2023-02-06
BMJ
Abstract:Objectives: To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design: Open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Setting: Three Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018. Participants: Adults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement. Interventions: Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Main outcome measures: Non-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%. Results: 568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference). Conclusion: Compared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109.