Abstract:It would be fair to say that in the past few decades, theory and computer modeling have played a major role in elucidating the microscopic factors that dictate the properties of functional novel materials. Together with advances in experimental techniques, theoretical methods are becoming increasingly capable of predicting properties of materials at different length scales, thereby bringing in sight the long-sought goal of designing material properties according to need. Advances in computer technology and their availability at a reasonable cost around the world have made tit all the more urgent to disseminate what is now known about these modern computational techniques. In this special issue on computational methodologies for materials by design we have tried to solicit articles from authors whose works collectively represent the microcosm of developments in the area. This turned out to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is space limitation in this special issue. Nevertheless, we gathered twenty articles that represent some of the important directions in which theory and modeling are proceeding in the general effort to capture the ability to produce materials by design. The majority of papers presented here focus on technique developments that are expected to uncover further the fundamental processes responsible for material properties, and for their growth modes and morphological evolutions. As for material properties, some of the articles here address the challenges that continue to emerge from attempts at accurate descriptions of magnetic properties, of electronically excited states, and of sparse matter, all of which demand new looks at density functional theory (DFT). I should hasten to add that much of the success in accurate computational modeling of materials emanates from the remarkable predictive power of DFT, without which we would not be able to place the subject on firm theoretical grounds. As we know and will also see from the collection of works here, DFT also provides a platform for testing, improving, and evaluating the feasibility of more approximate methods whose need has become even more urgent. This is understandable since functional materials, given their limited translational symmetry, necessitate the usage of unit cells with a large number of atoms (sometimes in hundreds). Even if DFT codes were efficient enough to handle several hundred atoms in the calculational super-cell, the extraction of equilibrium geometry for such systems requires injection of more efficient methodology, as geometry is the input and not the output of a DFT calculation. Equally important is the need to calculate the temperature dependencies of material properties and for simulations to be carried out at length scales suitable for incorporating kinetic effects from competing processes and cooperative effects from constituting entities. It is true that codes based on DFT are becoming increasingly efficient and that methods such as ab initio molecular dynamics simulations are available for simulations of systems at temperatures above 0 K. However, such approaches still have a way to go before they can be readily applied to materials with complex geometries and composition, and for time and length scales that are relevant to realistic environments in the laboratory. Several articles here represent some of the recent advances towards 'multi-scale' modeling of materials. Among the articles that focus exclusively on DFT, the contribution by Weinert et al [1] summarizes some of the advances made to better describe magnetic properties and entropic effects. The article by Kyrychenko and Ullrich [2] discusses recent developments in time dependent DFT to describe transport properties and absorption spectra of solids. Their model allows for a comprehensive treatment of electron--electron interaction, screening and correlation effects which are necessary for proper description of properties of the excited state. The contribution by Langreth and co-workers [3] summarizes their recent efforts at incorporating non-local van der Waals forces into DFT so as to make it suitable for accurate description of the physical and chemical properties of the ground state of sparse/soft matter. Their applications to molecules, layered systems, and hybrid structures are promising and mark the beginning of work in another important set of materials for which insights could be obtained from DFT. The paper here by Tang et al [4] focuses on the usage of grid-based methods for calculations of local charge densities. The virtue of the method is that charge densities are not confined to a lattice. Finally, as applications of DFT, the article by Groß [5] is representative of the usage of DFT in tailoring the electronic structures of surface alloys and other nanostructures, while the contribution by Bohnen et al [6] is a further example of the applicability of density functional perturbation theory in accurate descriptions of the lattice dynamics of functional nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes. For the modeling of amorphous materials, Biswas and co-workers [7] present a review of methods such as the reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) and 'experimentally constrained molecular relaxation' models which impose constraints to ensure that the final model meets a priori requirements on structure, topology, chemical ordering, etc. In a similar vein, the papers by Rossi and Ferrando [8] and Rogan et al [9] , summarize advances in the determination of the equilibrium structure of nanoparticles and nanoalloys through global optimization strategies such as genetic and Basin-hopping approaches, diversity-driven unbiased searches and the conformational space annealing method. Structure determination itself relies on the knowledge of the system energy landscape, the saddle points and the transition states. In this issue the work of Pedersen et al [10] is an example of how a saddle point search method can be used to study dislocation mobility in a covalent material, which can be a very challenging task for a complex material. Trushin et al [11] present a related procedure for understanding atomistic mechanisms and energetics of strain relaxation in heteroepitaxial systems and transitions from the coherent epitaxial (defect free) state to the state containing an isolated defect (localized or extended). To facilitate the simulation of rare events, Fichthorn et al [12] elaborate on the adoption of the bond-boost method for accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and its application to kinetic phenomena relevant to thin-film growth. They also present the state-bridging bond-boost method to address the dynamics of systems residing in a group of states connected by small energy barriers and separated from the rest of phase space by large barriers. In the genre of accelerated schemes which also seek to address the issue of completeness in the determination of reaction rates we include here the 'off-lattice' self-learning kinetic Monto Carlo method presented by Kara and co-workers [13] and its application to atomic cluster diffusion on fcc(111) surfaces. Further ramifications of the self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo method are presented in the paper by Nandipati et al [14] , who apply the recently developed optimistic synchronous relaxation (OSR) algorithm as well as the semi-rigorous synchronous sublattice (SL) algorithm for parallel computation of the coarsening of islands on fcc(111) surfaces. The above and related methods also lend themselves to the examination of morphological evolution of functional materials. The contribution by Hamouda et al [15] summarizes the effect of impurities on epitaxial growth and on shape evolution of systems. Similarly, using an atomistic lattice-gas model Li et al [16] describes the key features of the complex mounded morphologies which develop during deposition of Ag films on Ag(111) surfaces. Also, using a combination of a Monte Carlo method and continuum elasticity theory, Uhlík et al [17] present an efficient computational method for finding the equilibrium concentration profiles which minimize the free energy of intermixed heteroepitaxial islands of assigned shape and composition. The contribution by Leuenberger and Sham [18] establishes how the process of Umklapp-assisted recombination can be used to optically detect the spin state of the nucleus of a phosphorus donor. They present two methods to improve the optical detection of the spin state of a single nucleus in Si:P. The work of Ni et al [19] is an example of the application of the molecular dynamics technique to determine the thermal conductances across covalently bonded interfaces between oriented single crystal diamond and completely aligned polyethylene chains. Finally, the paper by Yildirim et al [20] illustrates the application of standard lattice dynamics and molecular statics methods to identify the novel characteristics of nanoalloys, as a function of composition and geometry. References [1] Weinert M, Schneider G, Podloucky R and Redinger J 2009 FLAPW: applications and implementations J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084201 [2] Kyrychenko F V and Ullrich C A 2009 Transport and optical conductivity in dilute magnetic semiconductors J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084202 [3] Langreth D C, Lundqvist B I, Chakarova-Käck S, Cooper V R, Dion M, Hyldgaard P, Kelkkanen A, Kleis J, Kong L, Li S, Moses P G, Murray E, Puzder A, Rydberg H, Schröder E and Thonhauser T 2009 A density functional for sparse matter J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084203 [4] Tang W, Sanville E and Henkelman G 2009 A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084204 [5] Groß A 2009 Tailoring the reactivity of bimetallic overlayer and surface alloy systems J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084205 [6] Bohnen K-P, Heid R and Chan C T 2009 Lattice instability and superconductivity in electron doped (3, 3) carbon nanotubes J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084206 [7] Biswas P, Tafen D N, Inam F, Cai B and Drabold D A 2009 Materials modeling by design: applications to amorphous solids J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084207 [8] Rossi G and Ferrando R 2009 Searching for low-energy structures of nanoparticles: a comparison of different methods and algorithms J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084208 [9] Rogan J, Ramírez M, Muñoz V, Alejandro Valdivia J, García G, Ramírez R and Kiwi M 2009 Diversity driven unbiased search of minimum energy cluster configurations J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084209 [10] Pedersen A, Pizzagalli L and Jónsson H 2009 Finding mechanism of transitions in complex systems: formation and migration of dislocation kinks in a silicon crystal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084210 [11] Trushin O, Jalkanen J, Granato E, Ying S C and Ala-Nissila T 2009 Atomistic studies of strain relaxation in heteroepitaxial systems J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084211 [12] Fichthorn K A, Miron R A, Wang Y and Tiwary Y 2009 Accelerated molecular dynamics of thin-film growth with the bond-boost method J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084212 [13] Kara A, Trushin O, Yildirim H and Rahman T S 2009 Off-lattice self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo: application to 2D cluster diffusion on the fcc(111) surface J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084213 [14] Nandipati G, Shim Y, Amar J G, Karim A, Kara A, Rahman T S and Trushin O 2009 Parallel kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of Ag(111) island coarsening using a large database J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084214 [15] Hamouda A, Stasevich T J, Pimpinelli A and Einstein T L 2009 Effects of impurities on surface morphology: some examples J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084215 [16] Li M, Han Y, Thiel P A and Evans J W 2009 Formation of complex wedding-cake morphologies during homoepitaxial film growth of Ag on Ag(111): atomistic, step-dynamics, and continuum modeling J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084216 [17] Uhlík F, Gatti R and Montalenti F 2009 A fast computational method for determining equilibrium concentration profiles in intermixed nanoislands J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084217 [18] Leuenberger M and Sham L J 2009 Theory of Umklapp-assisted recombination of bound excitons in Si:P J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084218 [19] Ni B, Watanabe T and Phillpot S P 2009 Thermal transport in polyethylene and at polyethylene–diamond interfaces investigated using molecular dynamics simulation J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084219 [20] Yildirim H, Kara A and Rahman T S 2009 Structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of AgnCu34-n nanoparticles J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 084220

Abstract:physica status solidi (a)Volume 195, Issue 2 p. 440-446 Original Paper A comparison of two-layered La2.5–2xK0.5+2xMn2O7+δ and La1–xKxMnO3+δ polycrystals for the magnetoresistance effect W. Zhong, Corresponding Author W. Zhong [email protected] National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaTel.: +86 025 359 4588, Fax: +86 025 359 5535Search for more papers by this authorW. Liu, W. Liu School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorX. S. Liu, X. S. Liu National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorH. Y. Jiang, H. Y. Jiang National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorC. T. Au, C. T. Au Chemistry Department and Center for Surface Analysis and Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorY. W. Du, Y. W. Du National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author W. Zhong, Corresponding Author W. Zhong [email protected] National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaTel.: +86 025 359 4588, Fax: +86 025 359 5535Search for more papers by this authorW. Liu, W. Liu School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorX. S. Liu, X. S. Liu National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorH. Y. Jiang, H. Y. Jiang National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorC. T. Au, C. T. Au Chemistry Department and Center for Surface Analysis and Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorY. W. Du, Y. W. Du National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 January 2003 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200305934Citations: 3AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Polycrystalline two-layered La2.5–2xK0.5+2xMn2O7+δ (x = 0.075) and ABO3-type La1–xKxMnO3+δ (x = 0.075) have been prepared by a modified sol–gel method and comparisons between their structures and magnetic and electric properties have been made. Compared with the La1–xKxMnO3+δ compound, a large deviation between the metal–insulator transition temperature (Tρ) and the magnetic transition temperature (TC) and a characteristic low-temperature magnetoresistance effect under a relatively low magnetic field have been observed in the polycrystalline two-layered La2.5–2xK0.5+2xMn2O7+δ compound. References [1] R. Von Helmolt, J. Wecker, B. Holzapfel, L. Schultz, and K. Samwer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2331 (1993. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2331 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar [2] H.Y. Hwang, S. W. Cheong, P. G. Radaelli, M. Marezio, and B. Batlog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 914 (1996. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.914 Web of Science®Google Scholar [3] P. Schiffer, A. P. Ramirez, W. Bao, and S. W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3336 (1995. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3336 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar [4] J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyriou, C. D. Potter, D. G. Hinks, J. D. Jorgensen, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B 54, 6172 (1996. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.6172 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [5] Y. Moritomo, Y. Tomioka, A. Asamitsu, Y. Tokura, and Y. Matsui, Nature 380, 141 (1996. 10.1038/380141a0 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [6] H. Asano, J. Hayakawa, and M. Matsui, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3638 (1996. 10.1063/1.115755 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [7] C. D. Ling, J.E. Millburn, J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyiou, J. Linton, and H. N. Bordallo, Phys. Rev. B 62, 15096 (2000. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.15096 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [8] T. Kimura, Y. Tomioka, H. Kuwahara, A. Asamitsu, M. Tamura, and Y. Tokura, Science 274, 1698 (1996. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1698 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar [9] R. Suryanarayanan, I. Zelenay, and J. Berthon, Mater. Res. Bull. 32, 595 (1997. 10.1016/S0025-5408(97)00028-7 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [10] C.D. Potter, M. Swiatek, S. D. Bader, D. N. Argyiou, J. F. Mitchell, D. J. Miller, D. G. Hinks, and J. D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. B 57, 72 (1998. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.72 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [11] D. N. Argyiou, J. F. Mitchell, C. D. Potter, S. D. Bader, R. Kleb, and J. D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. B 55, R11965 (1997. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R11965 Web of Science®Google Scholar [12] D. N. Argyiou, J. F. Mitchell, J. B. Goodenough, O. Chmaissem, S. Short, and J. D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1568 (1997. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1568 Web of Science®Google Scholar [13] J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyiou, J. D. Jorgensen, D. G. Hinks, C. D. Potter, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B 55, 63 (1997. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.63 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [14] R. Mahesh, R. Wang, and M. Itoh, Phys. Rev. B 57, 104 (1998. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.104 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [15] T. J. Zhou, Z. Yu, W. Zhong, X. N. Xu, H. H. Zhang, and Y. W. Du, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7975 (1999. 10.1063/1.369387 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [16] T. Kimura, A. Asamitsu, Y. Tomioka, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3720 (1997. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3720 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [17] D. N. Argyiou, J.F. Mitchell, P. G. Radaelli, H. N. Bordallo, D. E. Cox, M. Medarde, and J. D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8695 (1999. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8695 Web of Science®Google Scholar [18] T. Kimura, R. Kumai, Y. Tokura, J. Q. Li, and Y. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 58, 11081 (1998. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.11081 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [19] T. Hayashi, N. Miura, M. Tokunaga, T. Kimura, and Y. Tokura, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 11525 (1998. 10.1088/0953-8984/10/49/038 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [20] R. Suryanarayanan, G. Dhalenne, A. Revcolevschi, W. Prellier, J. P. Renard, C. Dupas, W. Caliebe, and T. Chatterji, Solid State Commun. 113, 267 (2000. 10.1016/S0038-1098(99)00471-8 Web of Science®Google Scholar [21] M. Kubota, H. Fujioka, K. Ohoyama, K. Hirota, Y. Moritomo, H. Yoshizawa, and Y. Endoh, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 60, 116 (1999. 10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00068-2 Web of Science®Google Scholar [22] K. Hirota, Y. Moritomo, H. Fujioka, M. Kubota, H. Yoshizawa, and Y. Endoh, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3380 (1998. 10.1143/JPSJ.67.3380 Web of Science®Google Scholar [23] W. Zhong, W. Chen, W. P. Ding, N. Zhang, A. Hu, Y. W. Du, and Q. J. Yan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 112 (1999. 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)01080-4 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [24] N. W. Hurst, S. J. Gentry, A. Jones, and B. D. McNicol, Catal. Rev. 24, 233 (1982). 10.1080/03602458208079654 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [25] T. Nakamura, G. Petzow, and L. J. Gauckler, Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 649 (1979). 10.1016/0025-5408(79)90048-5 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [26] B. C. Tofield and W. R. Scott, J. Solid State Chem. 10, 183 (1974. 10.1016/0022-4596(74)90025-5 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar [27] J. A. M. Van Roosmalen et al., J. Solid State Chem. 91, 225 (1991. 10.1016/0022-4596(91)90077-U Web of Science®Google Scholar [28] J. Topfer and J. B. Goodenough, Chem. Mater. 9, 1467 (1997. 10.1021/cm9700211 Web of Science®Google Scholar [29] H. Asano, J. Hayakawa, and M. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 56, 5395 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5395 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume195, Issue2January 2003Pages 440-446 ReferencesRelatedInformation

(Digital Presentation) Development of an Eam-Type Interatomic Potential Model Reproducing Theoretical Energetics in Polytype Structures

Energetics and Structural Transitions of Nonequivalent Polytypes for FCC and HCP Metals

Computational methodologies for designing materials

Mechanical And Thermodynamic Properties Of Mg17la2, La5si4 And La5sn3 Phases In Mg-Sn-Mn(Si)-La Alloy From First-Principles Calculations

Mechanical, Electronic and Thermodynamic Properties of C14-type AMg2 (A = Ca, Sr and Ba) Compounds from First Principles Calculations

Long-range empirical potential model: extension to hexagonal close-packed metals

First-principles study of structural stabilities and electronic characteristics of Mg–La intermetallic compounds

Predicting Structural and Dynamical Behavior of La-based Glasses and Melts from the Anharmonicity in Their Interatomic Potential

High-Throughput DFT Screening Method Via Local Bonding Model for Corrosion Resistant Alloy Designed for Naval Applications

Thermodynamic modelling for the long-period stacking ordered phase in Mg–Y–Al system: Construction and application

First Principles Based Multiparadigm Modeling of Electronic Structures and Dynamics

Thermodynamic assessment of Mg−Ni−Y system focusing on long-period stacking ordered phases in the Mg-rich corner

Flexible machine-learning interatomic potential for simulating structural disordering behavior of Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes

The Interplay Between Electron Localization, Magnetic Order, and Jahn-Teller Distortion that Dictates LiMnO$_2$ Phase Stability

A critical study of the elastic properties and stability of Heusler compounds: Phase change and tetragonal $X_{2}YZ$ compounds

Theoretical study on intermolecular interactions and thermodynamic properties of LLM-105

A Comparison of Two-Layered La2.52xK0.52xMn2O7 and La1xKxMnO3 Polycrystals for the Magnetoresistance Effect

A Response Embedded Atom Method of Interatomic Potentials

Non-adiabatic Dynamics Modeling Framework for Materials in Extreme Conditions

Theoretical Study of Phase Forming of Nazn13-Type Rare-Earth Intermetallics

Accounting for the Vibrational Contribution to the Configurational Entropy in Disordered Solids with Machine Learned Forcefields: A Case Study of Garnet Electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12