Abstract:Abstract Gene correlation network inference from single-cell transcriptomics data potentially allows to gain unprecendented insights into cell type-specific regulatory programs. ScRNA-seq data is severely affected by dropout, which significantly hampers and restrains current downstream analysis. Although newly developed tools are capable to deal with sparse data, no appropriate single-cell network inference workflow has been established. A potential way to end this deadlock is the application of data imputation methods, which already proofed to be useful in specific contexts of single-cell data analysis, e.g., recovering cell clusters. In order to infer cell-type specific networks, two prerequisites must be met: the identification of cluster-specific cell-types and the network inference itself. Here, we propose a benchmarking framework to investigate both objections. By using suitable reference data with inherent correlation structure, six representative imputation tools and appropriate evaluation measures, we were able to systematically infer the impact of data imputation on network inference. Major network structures were found to be preserved in low dropout data sets. For moderately sparse data sets, DCA was able to recover gene correlation structures, although systematically introducing higher correlation values. No imputation tool was able to recover true signals from high dropout data. However, by using an additional biological data set we could show that cell-cell correlation by means of specific marker gene expression was not compromised through data imputation. Our analysis showed that network inference is feasible for low and moderately sparse data sets by using the unimputed and DCA-prepared data, respectively. High sparsity data, on the other side, still pose a major problem since current imputation techniques are not able to facilitate network inference. The annotation of cluster-specific cell-types as a prerequisite is not hampered by data imputation but their power to restore the deeply hidden correlation structures is still not sufficient enough.

Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation

Identifying strengths and weaknesses of methods for computational network inference from single-cell RNA-seq data

Benchmarking scRNA-seq imputation tools with respect to network inference highlights deficits in performance at high levels of sparsity

scINRB: single-cell gene expression imputation with network regularization and bulk RNA-seq data

Benchmarking algorithms for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomic data

Issues arising from benchmarking single-cell RNA sequencing imputation methods

Scimc: a Platform for Benchmarking Comparison and Visualization Analysis of Scrna-Seq Data Imputation Methods.

Evaluating the Reproducibility of Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Inference Algorithms

Benchmarking deep learning methods for biologically conserved single-cell integration

Imputing Single-Cell RNA-seq Data by Combining Graph Convolution and Autoencoder Neural Networks

The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data

Cellular Similarity based Imputation for Single cell RNA Sequencing Data

scRNA-seq mixology: towards better benchmarking of single cell RNA-seq analysis methods

Topological benchmarking of algorithms to infer Gene Regulatory Networks from Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

A novel method for single-cell data imputation using subspace regression

NetBenchmark: a bioconductor package for reproducible benchmarks of gene regulatory network inference

Imputation in Scrna-seq Data Using Supervised Deep Generative Networks

Inference of single-cell network using mutual information for scRNA-seq data analysis

A systematic evaluation of single-cell RNA-sequencing imputation methods

Network Embedding-Based Representation Learning for Single Cell RNA-seq Data

Regulatory Network-Based Imputation of Dropouts in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data