Abstract:Viswajit Kandula 1 , Adham Elmously 2 , Thomas F. X. O'Donnell 1 , Virendra I. Patel 1 , Hiroo Takayama 1 1 Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA Comment on: Liu H, Zhang YY, Ding XH, et al . Proximal vs Extensive Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2023;116:270-8. Keywords: Type A dissection; proximal repair; extensive repair Submitted Dec 31, 2023. Accepted for publication Apr 24, 2024. Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1945 Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality (1,2). These patients, if they don't die before arriving at a hospital, often suffer from concomitant life-threatening pathology such as malperfusion syndromes (including stroke, acute myocardial infarction, renal/visceral ischemia and limb ischemia), aortic regurgitation, or cardiac tamponade. Though surgical intervention, the gold standard treatment, has reduced mortality compared to non-operative management (3,4), the optimal type and extent of repair continue to be debated and remain dependent on the surgeon and surgical center a patient is brought to. Depending on the extent of the dissection, the location of the entry tear, and the patency of the false lumen, patients who undergo repair of a type A dissection are at risk for aneurysmal degeneration over time, which could lead to the development of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm—a factor that should be considered when determining the extent of the repair at the time of the initial operation. These sequelae may require subsequent intervention such as an endovascular stent placement, or in more complicated situations, an open repair of the aneurysm. More recently, total arch replacements with or without concomitant elephant trunks (conventional and frozen) have been implemented to promote false lumen thrombosis and to reduce the risk of distal aneurysm formation. The article titled "Proximal vs Extensive Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery" by Liu et al. analyzed 5,510 patients who presented with ATAAD from 13 hospitals over a 5-year period to create a risk scoring model to help direct the type of repair that should be performed (5). Before delving into this article, it is important to note the excellent results of this series in context. There is a large disparity in the literature regarding surgical outcomes of repair for ATAAD as well as controversies regarding the optimal extent of repair—one that optimizes operative mortality and minimizes re-operative intervention—to achieve the ideal result. Whether one supports a more conservative surgical approach or an aggressive technique such as total arch reconstruction, few series are able to report mortality rates such as these, consistently below 10% (6-8). The authors' propensity score matched patients and implemented the eXtreme Gradient Boosting machine learning library to create a risk prediction model to predict operative mortality in patients. Their alphabet risk model includes parameters of age, body mass index, platelet-to-leukocyte ratio, albumin, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and preoperative malperfusion to predict operative mortality. Their key finding is that beyond a certain risk probability threshold (4.5%), extensive repair is associated with higher mortality than proximal repair [odds ratio (OR), 2.164; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.679–2.788], indicating that although a certain subset of patients may benefit from more extensive repair, a tailored strategy for repair of ATAAD leads to more favorable outcomes. Similar to this study, our group previously studied the association between the extent of aortic replacement and the outcomes of the procedures (9). We found that distal extension of an aortic procedure is independently associated with a higher complication rate, whereas proximal extension is not. Our multivariate logistic regression further supported this finding by demonstrating that partial or total arch replacement was an independent risk factor for post-operative complications. Like the study published by Liu et al. , our work also suggests that the immediate post-operative risk associated with aortic replacement should be balanced against the suspected future risk of an aortic event. Like the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk calculator, which serves as a tool to aid in the prediction of a patient's overall risk of mortality and morbidity when undergoing coronary and/or valve surgery, the model proposed by Liu et al. may provide the initial groundwork for -Abstract Truncated-

Long‐Term Risks of Stroke in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Acute Ischemic Stroke Combined with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report and Literature Review

Influence of Primary Intimal Tear Location in Type B Aortic Dissection As a Factor Portending Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Repair

Acute Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Receiving Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Long-term stroke incidence in proximal thoracic aorta aneurysm survivors

Cerebral Infarction and Risk Factors in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with Arch Branch Extension.

Stable Haemodynamics Associated with No Significant Electrocardiogram Abnormalities is a Good Prognostic Factor of Survival for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Acute Type-A Aortic Dissection with Coronary Artery Involvement.

Prognosis and Risk Factors of Stroke After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

Peripheral artery disease is an independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality in Stanford type A aortic dissection repair

Computed Tomography Angiography Findings Predict the Risk Factors for Preoperative Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Effect of Asymptomatic Common Carotid Artery Dissection on the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Postoperative stroke in acute type A aortic dissection: incidence, outcomes, and perioperative risk factors

Female patients have higher in‐hospital mortality after type A aortic dissection repair: A population study from the national inpatient sample

Age-related differences in acute aortic dissection

Operative strokes after repair of acute type A dissections: predisposing factors and implications

Abstract 11711: Factors Predicting Acute Ischemic Stroke Following Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) in Adults

Association of Long-term Use of Antihypertensive Medications With Late Outcomes Among Patients With Aortic Dissection

Striking a balance when operating for acute type A aortic dissection

Complications after endovascular repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection

Association of Renal Cyst and Type A Acute Aortic Dissection with Hypertension