Abstract:Purpose Agency theory postulates that research and development (R&D) investments are subject to managerial discretion and thus may not enhance firm value as expected. The inconclusive empirical findings in the literature is a testament of that. This paper aims to investigate the interplay between board gender diversity (i.e. women on boards) and value relevance of firms' effort to innovate as indicated by firms' R&D investments. Design/methodology/approach Through a sample of 1,626 US-listed firms from the period 2004 to 2019, the authors examine whether board gender diversity promotes or hampers value relevance of firms' efforts to innovate. The authors use ordinary least squares as the baseline model and address potential endogeneity through instrumental variable two-stage least square, and selection bias through Heckman selection model. Finally, the authors use the financial crisis of 2008 as a natural experiment to investigate the effect of board gender diversity during the crisis period. Findings The results show that board gender diversity positively moderates the relation between R&D and firm value. In times of financial crisis, R&D does not destroy firm value in firms with gender diverse board. The results are robust to measurement error, endogeneity issue, particularly simultaneity and selection bias. Practical implications The findings in this study have several practical implications. Firms that invest heavily in R&D should be mindful of gender diversity in their board recruitment strategies to enhance innovation outputs and firm value. Current and potential investors (i.e. shareholders) should take into consideration board gender diversity in their investment decision-making processes as the results show that gender diverse boards promote more effective governance, which, in turn, leads to better alignment of R&D investments with shareholder value. Regulators aiming to improve corporate governance policies should encourage gender diversity on the boards. The results align with global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 5 on gender equality. Policymakers may use the findings in this study to advocate for more gender diverse governance structures within corporations. Originality/value This study investigates the role gender diverse boards play in creating value from firms' R&D activities.

Board industry expertise and innovation input: evidence on the curvilinear relationship and the moderating effect of CEO

Busy Boards, Entrenched Directors and Corporate Innovation

Does board diversity in industry-experience boost firm value? The role of corporate innovation

Marketers on board: The influence of marketing-experienced board members (MEBMs) on firm innovativeness inputs and the moderating roles of CEO job characteristics

The board of directors and firm innovation: A meta-analytical review

Professors on boards and corporate innovation in China

Can board of directors' faultlines improve corporate innovation performance? Evidence from China

Postgraduate Education of Board Members and R&D Investment—Evidence from China

Human Capital between Generalists and Specialists: How Does It Impact Innovation?

The effect of CEO social capital, CEO duality and state-ownership on corporate innovation

CEO background experience and firms' environmental innovation: The moderating effect of tenure

The Impact of Board Capital on Open Innovation with the Moderating Effect of Executive Equity Incentives

CEO Tenure and R&D investment: founders vs. agents and the Role of independent directors

Unmasking intellectual capital from gender and nationality diversity on university spin-offs’ boards: a study on non-linear effects upon firm innovation

Board diversity: female director participation and corporate innovation

Board Human Capital and Enterprise Growth: A Perspective of Ambidextrous Innovation

Does directors’ innovation experience promote firm innovation? Evidence from China

Finding the key to the black box of board diversity and firm performance: A mediating effect analysis of technological innovation

CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Innovation Outcomes: Evidence from China

Technical expert CEOs and corporate innovation

When R&D investment improves firm value: the role of board gender diversity