Abstract:LBA9000 Background: EGFR TKIs are standard 1L therapy for metastatic NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations; however, most patients (pts) ultimately experience PD. We report the protocol-specified final analysis (FA) from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 study of pemetrexed (pem) and platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) as subsequent therapy for pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (NCT03515837). Methods: Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, documented DEL19 or L858R EGFR mutation, and progression after EGFR TKI treatment were enrolled. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 35 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo (pbo) Q3W plus 4 cycles of pem and carboplatin or cisplatin Q3W followed by maintenance pem. Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 TPS (<50% vs ≥50%), prior osimertinib (yes vs no), and region (East Asia vs not East Asia). Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and OS. ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety were secondary endpoints. Final PFS testing was completed at the second interim analysis (IA2; data cutoff, Dec 3, 2021); all other endpoints were assessed at FA (data cutoff, Jan 17, 2023). Efficacy boundaries based on actual observed events were 1-sided P = 0.0117 for PFS (IA2) and P = 0.0118 for OS (FA). Results: 492 pts were randomized to pembro + chemo (n = 245) or pbo + chemo (n = 247). At IA2, median PFS (95% CI) was 5.6 (5.5–5.8) mo with pembro + chemo vs 5.5 (5.4–5.6) mo with pbo + chemo; HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.97); P = 0.0122; and the results did not reach statistical significance. Median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff at FA (Jan 17, 2023) was 42.0 (29.5–53.9) mo. At FA, median OS (95% CI) was 15.9 (13.7–18.8) vs 14.7 (12.7–17.1) mo. While the HR for OS (0.84 [95% CI, 0.69–1.02]; P = 0.0362) favored pembro + chemo vs pbo + chemo, it did not reach statistical significance. OS rates at 12-mo were 61.6% vs 59.4% and at 24-mo were 30.6% vs 26.4%. HR for OS was similar in PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (HR, 0.84) and TPS <50% groups (HR, 0.85). ORR (95% CI) in ITT was 29.0% (23.4%–35.1%) with pembro + chemo vs 27.1% (21.7%–33.1%) with pbo + chemo. Median DOR was 6.3 (2.3 to 40.8+) mo vs 5.6 (1.8+ to 40.6+) mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 43.7% of pts in pembro + chemo arm and 38.6% in pbo + chemo arm; grade 5 AEs occurred in 0.4% vs 0.8%. Grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 4.5% of pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 2.0% in the pbo + chemo arm; 0.4% vs 0% had grade 5 events. Conclusions: In the KEYNOTE-789 study, addition of pembro to chemo in pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC did not significantly prolong PFS and OS in comparison to pbo + chemo. AEs were manageable in both arms, and no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03820986 .

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Japanese Patients With Endometrial Cancer: Results From Study 309/KEYNOTE‐775

Analysis of East Asia Subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Randomized Phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Treatment of Physician’s Choice

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Pemetrexed and Platinum with or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Tki)-Resistant, EGFR-mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 Study

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Combination with Adjuvant Chemotherapy With/without Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) patients (pts) treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or treatment of physician’s choice (TPC).

Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab versus platinum doublet chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

Phase 3, randomized, open-label study of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib versus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic squamous non‐small‐cell lung cancer in KEYNOTE‐407

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with triple‐negative breast cancer: Results from KEYNOTE‐355

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab versus Doxorubicin for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer with Short Treatment-Free Intervals Following First-Line Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Persistent, Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Results From KEYNOTE‐826

Second-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal cancer: subgroup analysis from KEYNOTE-181

ENGOT-EN9/LEAP-001: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib Versus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Chinese Patients with Metastatic Squamous NSCLC in KEYNOTE-407

A single-institution retrospective exploratory analysis on the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer: insights from ProMisE molecular classification system

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Standard of Care for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III LEAP-017 Study