Abstract:Objective: To investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) in the differential diagnosis and blood perfusion evaluation of benign and malignant hepatic lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 86 patients (96 lesions) with pathologically or clinically confirmed hepatic lesions or hepatic lesions diagnosed based on follow-up results, among whom 48 had malignant lesions (53 lesions) and 38 had benign lesions (43 lesions). The patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance (MR) plain scan, contrast-enhanced scan, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with different b values (b = 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1 000, and 1 200 s/mm2) to determine the parameters of the double exponential model for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): fast diffusion coefficient Dfast, slow diffusion coefficient Dslow, and percentage of fast-diffusion constituent F value. The patients were divided into groups according to the blood supply to lesions on conventional MR plain scan and contrast-enhanced scan, and there were 47 lesions in abundant blood supply group and 49 in poor blood supply group. The data for analysis were Dfast, Dslow, and F values of benign/malignant lesion groups and abundant/poor blood supply groups. The independent samples t-test was used for statistical analysis; the independent samples non-parametric test Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of F value; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of above parameters in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions and blood supply evaluation. Results: Compared with the malignant lesion group, the benign lesion group had significantly higher Dslow, and F values (P< 0.001 orP= 0.001) and a higher Dfast value (P= 0.053). Compared with the poor blood supply group, the abundant blood supply group had significantly higher Dfast and F values (P< 0.001 orP= 0.001) and a higher Dslow value (P= 0.185). According to the ROC curve, the cut-off values of Dslow, Dfast, and F values in the diagnosis of benign/malignant hepatic lesions and evaluation of abundant/poor blood supply were 1.18×10-3mm2/s, 27.20×10-3mm2/s, 20.25%, 1.17×10-3mm2/s, 20.30×10-3mm2/s, and 17.80%, respectively, with sensitivities, specificities, accuracy, and areas under the ROC curve of 90.69%/92.45%/91.66%/0.938, 46.51%/73.58%/61.45%/0.589, 74.41%/50.94%/62.50%/0.653, 59.57%/57.14%/58.33%/0.559, 55.32%/63.26%/59.37%/0.618, and 93.61%/89.79%/90.62%/0.961, respectively. Conclusion: The parameter of the double exponential model for IVIM, Dslow value, has a certain value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant hepatic lesions, and F value can show blood perfusion in benign and malignant hepatic lesions without the need for contrast-enhanced scan, which provides a reference for the qualitative diagnosis of liver tumor.

The Value of CT Perfusion Parameters and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

[Value of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Hepatic Lesions and Blood Perfusion Evaluation].

Clinic Value of Diffusion Weighted and Perfusion Weighted MR Imaging in Focal Hepatic Lesions

The application of the quantitative analysis of three-dimensional whole-liver DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of hepatic tumors

Preliminary Study of Mr Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Liver for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Dysplastic Nodules in Cirrhotic Liver

Comparison of Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Evaluation of Focal Malignant Liver Masses

Application value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in estimating the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma

Differential Value of Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging in Liver Nodules

The Value of Diffusion-weighted Imagesin Diagnosis of Liver Masses

The value of diffusion weighted imaging in micro-small hepatocellular carcinomas (≤1 cm)detection

The value of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance in primary hepatocellullar carcinomas

Clinical application value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of focal space-occupying lesions in liver

Diffusion tensor imaging in differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantitation for Differentiate Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Hepatocellular Adenoma

Diagnostic Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging and CT and MR Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Different Degrees of Liver Cirrhosis

The value of quantized diffussion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions

The Roles of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Parameters in Preoperative Evaluation of Pathological Grades and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Early Diagnosis Value of DCE-MRI Hemodynamic Parameters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Quantitative study in apparent diffusion coefficients evaluate the diffusion-weighted MR imaging for clinical follow-up of liver cancer

Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma from Healthy Pancreas Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging:Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Derived Parameters