Abstract:Intracellular bodies such as nucleoli, Cajal bodies and various signalling assemblies represent membraneless organelles, or condensates, that form via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)1,2. Biomolecular interactions—particularly homotypic interactions mediated by self-associating intrinsically disordered protein regions—are thought to underlie the thermodynamic driving forces for LLPS, forming condensates that can facilitate the assembly and processing of biochemically active complexes, such as ribosomal subunits within the nucleolus. Simplified model systems3–6 have led to the concept that a single fixed saturation concentration is a defining feature of endogenous LLPS7–9, and has been suggested as a mechanism for intracellular concentration buffering2,7,8,10. However, the assumption of a fixed saturation concentration remains largely untested within living cells, in which the richly multicomponent nature of condensates could complicate this simple picture. Here we show that heterotypic multicomponent interactions dominate endogenous LLPS, and give rise to nucleoli and other condensates that do not exhibit a fixed saturation concentration. As the concentration of individual components is varied, their partition coefficients change in a manner that can be used to determine the thermodynamic free energies that underlie LLPS. We find that heterotypic interactions among protein and RNA components stabilize various archetypal intracellular condensates—including the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules and P-bodies—implying that the composition of condensates is finely tuned by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interaction network. In the context of RNA-processing condensates such as the nucleolus, this manifests in the selective exclusion of fully assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, providing a thermodynamic basis for vectorial ribosomal RNA flux out of the nucleolus. This methodology is conceptually straightforward and readily implemented, and can be broadly used to extract thermodynamic parameters from microscopy images. These approaches pave the way for a deeper understanding of the thermodynamics of multicomponent intracellular phase behaviour and its interplay with the nonequilibrium activity that is characteristic of endogenous condensates. Heterotypic multicomponent interactions are shown to dominate the liquid–liquid phase separation that enables the formation of intracellular condensates.

Mesoscale structure–function relationships in mitochondrial transcriptional condensates

Structure-function relationships in mitochondrial transcriptional condensates

Transcriptional condensates and phase separation: condensing information across scales and mechanisms

Promoter and Gene-Body RNA-Polymerase II co-exist in partial demixed condensates

Nucleated transcriptional condensates amplify gene expression

Transcription regulation by biomolecular condensates

Reconciling competing models on the roles of condensates and soluble complexes in transcription factor function

Phase separation drives the self-assembly of mitochondrial nucleoids for transcriptional modulation

Emerging insights into transcriptional condensates

Transcriptional condensates: a blessing or a curse for gene regulation?

RNA in formation and regulation of transcriptional condensates

Ripening and synchronization of biomolecular condensates in a heterogeneous elastic medium

Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation

Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates

Dynamically arrested condensate fusion creates complex structures with varying material properties

Nonspecific Interactions in Transcription Regulation and Organization of Transcriptional Condensates

Nonequilibrium phases of a biomolecular condensate facilitated by enzyme activity

RNA-driven phase transitions in biomolecular condensates

RNA-mediated demixing transition of low-density condensates

Active RNA synthesis patterns nuclear condensates

Condensate interfacial forces reposition DNA loci and probe chromatin viscoelasticity