Gender fairness within the Force Concept Inventory

Adrienne Traxler,Rachel Henderson,John Stewart,Gay Stewart,Alexis Papak,Rebecca Lindell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010103

IF: 2.359

2019-10-04

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Abstract:Removing the eight gender-biased items from Force Concept Inventory scoring cuts the gender gap in test scores in half.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?

Adrian Madsen,Sarah B. McKagan,Eleanor C. Sayre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020121

2014-03-26

Abstract:We review the literature on the gender gap on concept inventories in physics. Across studies of the most commonly used mechanics concept inventories, the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE), mens average pretest scores are always higher than womens, and in most cases mens posttest scores are higher as well. The weighted average gender difference on these tests is 13% for pretest scores, 12% for posttest scores, and 6% for normalized gain. This difference is much smaller than the average difference in normalized gain between traditional lecture and interactive engagement (25%), but it is large enough that it could impact the results of studies comparing the effectiveness of different teaching methods. There is sometimes a gender gap on commonly used electromagnetism concept inventories, but it is usually much smaller and sometimes is zero or favors women. The weighted average gender difference on these tests is 3.7% for pretest scores, 8.5% for posttest scores, and 6% for normalized gain. Based on our analysis of 26 published articles, no single factor is sufficient to explain the gap. Several high-profile studies that have claimed to account for or reduce the gender gap have failed to be replicated in subsequent studies, suggesting that isolated claims of explanations of the gender gap should be interpreted with caution. Other factors, such as gender differences in background preparation, scores on different kinds of assessment, and splits between how students respond to test questions when answering for themselves or for a scientist do contribute to a difference between male and female responses, but the size of these differences is smaller than the size of the overall gender gap, suggesting that the gender gap is most likely due to the combination of many small factors rather than any one factor that can easily be modified.

Physics Education
Exploring gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory using a random effects meta-analysis of international studies

Purwoko Haryadi Santoso,Bayu Setiaji,Wahyudi,Johan Syahbrudin,Syamsul Bahri,Fathurrahman,A. Suci Rizky Ananda,Yusuf Sodhiqin

2024-03-12

Abstract:The force concept inventory (FCI) is one of the research-based assessments (RBAs) established by the physics education research (PER) community to measure students' understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Former works have often recorded the notion of gendered mean FCI scores favoring male students notably in the North America (NA) based studies. Nevertheless, these performance gaps remain inconclusive and unexplored outside the NA context. This paper aims to fill this gap by meta-analyzing the mean FCI scores between gender based on the existing PER literature beyond the NA context. We analyzed the magnitude and direction on the mean FCI scores between gender on the basis of primary international studies published over the last two decades. We also explored the moderating impact of international study characteristics on the meta-analytic findings by performing a subgroup analysis to study the different study regions stratified by two subgroups (NA vs non-NA authors). Thirty-eight studies reporting the mean FCI scores by gender were included in the present meta-analysis. We employed Hedges' g statistic to estimate to what degree the mean FCI scores may be different between male and female students on each study. Under a random effects model, we meta-analyzed the findings and conducted a subgroup analysis to answer the research questions. In summary, our meta-analysis indicated a significantly positive and moderate amount of gendered mean FCI scores in favor of male students both in NA- and non-NA based regions, and the performance gaps were wider in the NA-based studies. Suggestions are discussed for promoting gender fairness in the FCI when interpreting its scores for teaching, learning, and forthcoming studies.

Physics Education
Gender differences in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics: a UK cross-institution comparison

Simon Bates,Robyn Donnelly,Cait MacPhee,David Sands,Marion Birch,Niels R Walet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/2/421

2013-02-05

European Journal of Physics

Abstract:We present the results of a combined study from three UK universities where we investigate the existence and persistence of a performance gender gap in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Using the Force Concept Inventory, we find that students at all three universities exhibit a statistically significant gender gap, with males outperforming females. This gap is narrowed but not eliminated after instruction, using a variety of instructional approaches. Furthermore, we find that before instruction the quartile with the lowest performance on the diagnostic instrument comprises a disproportionately high fraction (∼50%) of the total female cohort. The majority of these students remain in the lowest-performing quartile post-instruction. Analysis of responses to individual items shows that male students outperform female students on practically all items on the instrument. Comparing the performance of the same group of students on end-of-course examinations, we find no statistically significant gender gaps.

physics, multidisciplinary,education, scientific disciplines
Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into Two Equivalent Half-Length Tests

Jing Han,Lei Bao,Li Chen,Tianfang Cai,Yuan Pi,Shaona Zhou,Yan Tu,Kathleen Koenig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.11.010112

2015-01-01

Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research

Abstract:The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) is a 30-question multiple-choice assessment that has been a building block for much of the physics education research done today. In practice, there are often concerns regarding the length of the test and possible test-retest effects. Since many studies in the literature use the mean score of the FCI as the primary variable, it would be useful then to have different shorter tests that can produce FCI-equivalent scores while providing the benefits of being quicker to administer and overcoming the test-retest effects. In this study, we divide the 1995 version of the FCI into two half-length tests; each contains a different subset of the original FCI questions. The two new tests are shorter, still cover the same set of concepts, and produce mean scores equivalent to those of the FCI. Using a large quantitative data set collected at a large midwestern university, we statistically compare the assessment features of the two half-length tests and the full-length FCI. The results show that the mean error of equivalent scores between any two of the three tests is within 3%. Scores from all tests are well correlated. Based on the analysis, it appears that the two half-length tests can be a viable option for score based assessment that need to administer tests quickly or need to measure short-term gains where using identical pre- and post-test questions is a concern.
Gender gap and polarisation of physics on global courses

Allan L. Alinea,Wade Naylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.03302

2016-05-11

Physics Education

Abstract:We extend on previous research on the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) given to first year classical mechanics students (N=66 students, over four years) pre and post score, for students on an international (global) course at Osaka University. In particular, we revisit the notion of "polarisation" in connection with the six polarisation-inducing questions in the FCI and examine its gender aspect. Our data suggest that this phenomenon is not unique to one gender. Furthermore, the extent by which it is exhibited by males may differ from that of females at the beginning (pretest) but the gap closes upon learning more about forces (posttest). These findings are for the most part, complemented by our result for the FCI as a whole. Although the differences in means for males and females suggest a gender gap, statistical analysis shows that there is no gender difference at the 95% confidence level.
Exploring the Structure of Misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with Modified Module Analysis

James Wells,Rachel Henderson,John Stewart,Gay Stewart,Jie Yang,Adrienne Traxler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122

2019-05-15

Abstract:Module Analysis for Multiple-Choice Responses (MAMCR) was applied to a large sample of Force Concept Inventory (FCI) pretest and post-test responses ($N_{pre}=4509$ and $N_{post}=4716$) to replicate the results of the original MAMCR study and to understand the origins of the gender differences reported in a previous study of this data set. When the results of MAMCR could not be replicated, a modification of the method was introduced, Modified Module Analysis (MMA). MMA was productive in understanding the structure of the incorrect answers in the FCI, identifying 9 groups of incorrect answers on the pretest and 11 groups on the post-test. These groups, in most cases, could be mapped on to common misconceptions used by the authors of the FCI to create distactors for the instrument. Of these incorrect answer groups, 6 of the pretest groups and 8 of the post-test groups were the same for men and women. Two of the male-only pretest groups disappeared with instruction while the third male-only pretest group was identified for both men and women post-instruction. Three of the groups identified for both men and women on the post-test were not present for either on the pretest. The rest of the identified incorrect answer groups did not represent misconceptions, but were rather related to the the blocked structure of some FCI items where multiple items are related to a common stem. The groups identified had little relation to the gender unfair items previously identified for this data set, and therefore, differences in the structure of student misconceptions between men and women cannot explain the gender differences reported for the FCI.

Physics Education
Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

Shangchao Min,Lianzhen He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100811

IF: 2.704

2019-01-01

Studies In Educational Evaluation

Abstract:This study investigated differential item functioning (DIF), differential bundle functioning (DBF), and differential test functioning (DTF) across gender of the reading comprehension section of the Graduate School Entrance English Exam in China. The datasets included 10,000 test-takers' item-level responses to 6 five-item testlets. Both DIF and DBF were examined by using poly-simultaneous item bias test and item-response-theory-likelihood-ratio test, and DTF was investigated with multi-group confirmatory factor analyses (MG-CFA). The results indicated that although none of the 30 items exhibited statistically and practically significant DIF across gender at the item level, 2 testlets were consistently identified as having significant DBF at the testlet level by the two procedures. Nonetheless, DBF does not manifest itself at the overall test score level to produce DTF based on MG-CFA. This suggests that the relationship between item-level DIF and test-level DTF is a complicated issue with the mediating effect of testlets in testlet-based language assessment.
Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards

Michelle Enxi Deng,Emily Ford,Adelheid A M Nicol,Kalee De France

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486

Abstract:In the last few decades, the armed forces in Western countries such as Canada and the United States have accepted women into virtually all military occupations. Despite this, a growing body of research confirms that female service members face prejudiced treatment while conducting their work in these organizations that continue to be predominately masculine and male-dominated. In particular, women attending the Canadian Military Colleges (CMCs) experience gender-related conflicts arising from the dissimilar fitness test standards between male and female cadets. There have been, however, few studies that scrutinize the psychological mechanisms of these tensions. The aim of this study was to unpack the existing biased perceptions against women pertaining to physical fitness through ambivalent sexism, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism. Officer and naval cadets (n = 167, 33.5% women) at the Royal Military College of Canada (RMC) completed survey measures. Indirect effect analyses showed that cadets who viewed the fitness standards to be unfair expressed more hostile rather than benevolent sexist outlooks against women, and these negative feelings were connected to greater levels of social dominance and right-wing authoritarianism. These results indicate that sexist beliefs, competitive worldviews, and authoritarianism are underlying attitudes that should be addressed by militaries striving to fully integrate women into their forces.
Examination of Gender-Related Differential Item Functioning Through Poly-BW Indices

Tsai-Wei Huang,Pei-Chen Wu,Magdalena Mo Ching Mok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821459

IF: 3.8

2022-02-25

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The existing differential item functioning (DIF) detection approaches relying on item difficulty or item discrimination are limited for understanding the associates of DIF items, and consequently, DIF items were conventionally either deleted or ignored. Given the importance of minimizing DIF items in test construction, teachers or testing practitioners need more information regarding possible associates of DIF items. Using an example of a teacher-made mathematics achievement test, this study aimed to examine how the Poly-BW indices (power, defenselessness, disturbance, and hint) contributed to the properties of gender-related DIF items. Data from a 34-item mathematics achievement test that involved 1,439 seventh-grade students from Taiwan (51.01% boys and 48.99% girls) showed that the differences of the defenselessness (mp) and power (cp) indices between men and women served as salient predictors of the DIF measures estimated by the Poly Simultaneous Item Bias Test (Poly-SIBTEST) procedure and with satisfactory accuracy of hit rates. Items with relatively large defenselessness for men were likely to present male-favoring DIFs, whereas items with relatively large power for men were likely to present female-favoring DIFs. The Poly-BW indices yielded directions for modifying items for teachers in practice.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Exploring the pre-instruction gender gap in physics.

Eric Burkholder,Shima Salehi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271184

IF: 3.7

2022-07-16

PLoS ONE

Abstract:There is a substantial body of work in physics education looking at gender disparities in physics. Recent work has linked gender disparities in college physics course performance to disparities in high school physics preparation, but to our knowledge, the origin of the disparity in high school physics preparation is still underexplored. In a select sample, we found that women on average had lower force and motion conceptual evaluation (FMCE) pre-scores (the FMCE is a short conceptual assessment of Newton's laws), and FMCE pre-score entirely mediated the effects of high school preparation and social-psychological factors on exam performance. The gender gap in FMCE pre-scores could not be explained by differences in the number of physics courses taken in high school. Instead, we find that the gender gap in the FMCE is partially explained by female students' higher levels of general test anxiety. We hypothesize that the format of the FMCE, a timed assessment, triggers stereotype threat in female students despite being a low-stakes assessment. Therefore, instructors and researchers should take care in interpreting the results of such concept inventory scores and should re-think the way they assess understanding of physics concepts. Results of this work aligned with previous findings on gender disparity in timed exams call upon investigating gender equitable assessment formats for evaluating physics knowledge to replace timed assessments, either high or low stakes.

multidisciplinary sciences
Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Carol Isaac,Barbara Lee,Molly Carnes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181b6ba00

IF: 7.84

2009-10-01

Academic Medicine

Abstract:PURPOSE: To systematically review experimental evidence for interventions mitigating gender bias in employment. Unconscious endorsement of gender stereotypes can undermine academic medicine's commitment to gender equity.METHOD: The authors performed electronic and hand searches for randomized controlled studies since 1973 of interventions that affect gender differences in evaluation of job applicants. Twenty-seven studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions fell into three categories: application information, applicant features, and rating conditions.RESULTS: The studies identified gender bias as the difference in ratings or perceptions of men and women with identical qualifications. Studies reaffirmed negative bias against women being evaluated for positions traditionally or predominantly held by men (male sex-typed jobs). The assessments of male and female raters rarely differed. Interventions that provided raters with clear evidence of job-relevant competencies were effective. However, clearly competent women were rated lower than equivalent men for male sex-typed jobs unless evidence of communal qualities was also provided. A commitment to the value of credentials before review of applicants and women's presence at above 25% of the applicant pool eliminated bias against women. Two studies found unconscious resistance to "antibias" training, which could be overcome with distraction or an intervening task. Explicit employment equity policies and an attractive appearance benefited men more than women, whereas repeated employment gaps were more detrimental to men. Masculine-scented perfume favored the hiring of both sexes. Negative bias occurred against women who expressed anger or who were perceived as self-promoting.CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence exists for strategies to mitigate gender bias in hiring.

education, scientific disciplines,health care sciences & services
The impact of stereotype threat on gender gap in introductory physics

Alexandru Maries,Nafis I Karim,Chandralekha Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2017.pr.059

2020-06-26

Abstract:Many prior studies have found a gender gap between male and female students' performance on conceptual assessments such as the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) with male students performing better than female students. Prior studies have also found that activation of a negative stereotype about a group or stereotype threat, e.g., asking test-takers to indicate their ethnicity before taking a test, can lead to deteriorated performance of the stereotyped group. Here, we describe two studies in which we investigated the gender gap on the FCI and CSEM. In the first study, we investigated whether asking students to indicate their gender immediately before taking hte CSEM increased the gender gap compared to students who were not asked for this information. In the second study, conducted with over 1100 introductory physics students, we investigated the prevalence of the belief that men generally perform better in physics than women and the extent to which this belief is correlated with the performance of both the female and male students on the FCI.

Physics Education
Reducing the gender gap on adolescents' interest in study fields: The impact of perceived changes in ingroup gender norms and gender prototypicality

Vincenzo Iacoviello,Giulia Valsecchi,Matthieu Vétois,Juan M. Falomir-Pichastor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09909-z

2024-04-05

Social Psychology of Education

Abstract:Despite some progress towards gender equality in Western societies, traditional gender norms still shape career choices, perpetuating a gender gap where girls are more likely to pursue traditionally feminine fields like healthcare, elementary education, and domestic roles (HEED), while boys are drawn to masculine domains such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This research investigates whether, and under which conditions, the perception that gender norms are progressively changing towards less gender dichotomy can reduce this gender gap in academic fields. We recruited a sample of 642 high-school students (394 women and 248 men), and experimentally manipulated both the salience of changes in gender norm (stability vs change) and participants' gender prototypicality. The main dependent variable was participants' interest in stereotypically feminine (HEED) and masculine (STEM) academic fields. The results indicated a slight decrease in the gender gap for stereotypically feminine fields (HEED) among participants who saw themselves as typical members of their gender group, but no significant change was observed for stereotypically masculine fields (STEM). These findings suggest that shifting perceptions of gender norms may have a limited effect on modifying traditional educational and career choices, underscoring the resilience of entrenched gender stereotypes.

psychology, educational
Examining gender differences in the use of multidimensional forced‐choice measures of personality in terms of test‐taker reactions and test fairness

Steven Zhou,Philseok Lee,Shea Fyffe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21521

2024-03-01

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Abstract:Human resource (HR) practices have been focused on using assessments that are robust to faking and response biases associated with Likert‐type scales. As an alternative, multidimensional forced‐choice (MFC) measures have recently shown advances in reducing faking and response biases while retaining similar levels of validity to Likert‐type measures. Although research evidence supports the effectiveness of MFC measures, fairness issues resulting from gender biases in the use of MFC measures have not yet been investigated in the literature. Given the importance of gender equity in HR development, it is vital that new assessments improve upon known gender biases in the historical use of Likert‐type measures and do not lead to gender discrimination in HR practices. In this vein, our investigation focuses specifically on potential gender biases in the use of MFC measures for HR development. Specifically, our study examines differential test‐taker reactions and differential prediction of self‐assessed leadership ability between genders when using the MFC personality measure. In an experimental study with college students, we found no evidence of gender differences in test‐taker reactions to MFC measures. In a second cross‐sectional study with full‐time employees, we found evidence of intercept differences, such that females were frequently underpredicted when using MFC personality measures to predict self‐assessed leadership ability. Moreover, the pattern of differential prediction using MFC measures was similar to that of Likert‐type measures. Implications for MFC personality measures in applied practice are discussed.

management,industrial relations & labor,psychology, applied
The Communicative Participation Item Bank–Gender-Diverse Version: Item Bank Calibration and Short Form

Carolyn Baylor,Alyssa Bamer,Cait Brown,Jingyu Linna Jin,Jeffrey Teixeira,Michael Nuara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00260

2024-01-19

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to calibrate an item set for a new version of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) specifically for use with gender-diverse clients. This new version contains a new item stem as well as other minor wording changes from the original CPIB in order to be acceptable to gender-diverse respondents. Method: Survey data on 47 candidate items were collected from 434 transgender individuals: 219 assigned female at birth (AFAB) and 215 assigned male at birth (AMAB). Item response theory analyses included evaluation of unidimensionality, local dependence, fit to a graded response model, and differential item functioning (DIF) between AFAB and AMAB respondents. Results: The original set of 47 items was unidimensional, but 16 items were removed due to local dependence, resulting in a final item bank of 31 items. There was no evidence of DIF between AFAB and AMAB participants. Reliability of the full item bank is good (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 20 and 76 and high (i.e., > 0.9) between T scores of 20 and 68. The short form had good reliability (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 24 and 64. Conclusions: The Communicative Participation Item Bank–Gender-Diverse (CPIB-GD) version provides a new option for person-reported outcome measurement with gender-diverse clients. Clinicians are cautioned to use only the new CPIB-GD with gender-diverse clients, and not the original CPIB due to unacceptable wording in the original version for this population. The original CPIB remains valid and appropriate for the populations for which it was developed. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24993309

rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields

Sarah Hand,Lindsay Rice,Eric Greenlee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9408-8

2017-10-16

Social Psychology of Education

Abstract:There is a shortfall of girls and women pursuing STEM disciplines, a deficit that may be partially attributed to subtle forms of bias that are tied to traditional gender role stereotypes. The current study examined these subtle biases in high school teachers and students in two ways: by asking teachers and students to attribute masculine and feminine traits to the typical scientist or humanities professional, and by inquiring about the academic performance assumed of boys and girls. In addition, students were surveyed about their own self-efficacy in math and science courses and gender-balanced teaching initiatives present in the classroom. Results showed that teachers and students exhibited subtle bias by attributing more masculine characteristics to a scientist and feminine characteristics to the humanities. Teachers and students also reported their belief that boys tend to perform better than girls in STEM disciplines. Finally, our results echoed previous literature examining self-efficacy discrepancies for girls in math and science classes, and indicated a lack of gender-balanced teaching initiatives in math and science classes. These results have broad implications for the lack of women in STEM disciplines, and they also reveal a potential means of classroom intervention to help counteract these subtle forms of bias.

psychology, educational
Gender gap in standardized tests: What are we measuring?

Silvia Griselda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.010

IF: 2

2024-03-29

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Abstract:Typically, in standardised tests, girls underperform boys in mathematics while boys underperform girls in reading. Can these educational inequalities be driven by specific testing practices? This study addresses this question by innovatively using data from the largest worldwide standardized test and exploiting the random variation in the format of the tests assigned to students. I find that there is a noticeable widening of the gender gap when a larger share of questions is multiple-choice, rather than filling-the-gap questions. A 10 percentage point increase in the share of multiple-choice questions inflates female under-performance in mathematics by 0.025 standard deviations and male under-performance in reading by 0.035 standard deviations. This accounts for nearly one-quarter of the overall gender disparity found in these subjects. I provide suggestive evidence that ruling out alternative options, rather than coming up with an entire answer, may contribute to cognitive information overload among students with lower confidence levels (generally girls in mathematics and boys in reading). These cognitive loads, in turn, have implications for a student's future level of effort and performance.

economics
The Relativity Concept Inventory: development, analysis and results

J. S. Aslanides,C. M. Savage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010118

2013-02-28

Abstract:We report on a concept inventory for special relativity: the development process, data analysis methods, and results from an introductory relativity class. The Relativity Concept Inventory tests understanding of kinematic relativistic concepts. An unusual feature is confidence testing for each question. This can provide additional information; for example high confidence correlated with incorrect answers suggests a misconception. A novel aspect of our data analysis is the use of Monte Carlo simulations to determine the significance of correlations. This approach is particularly useful for small sample sizes, such as ours. Our results include a gender bias that was not present in other assessment, similar to that reported for the Force Concept Inventory.

Physics Education
The reliability of the gender Implicit Association Test (gIAT) for high-ability careers

S. Stanley Young,Warren B. Kindzierski

2024-03-15

Abstract:Males outnumber females in many high ability careers, for example, in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and professors in academic medicine. These differences are often attributed to implicit, subconscious, bias. One objective of this study was to use statistical p value plots to independently test the ability to support the claim of implicit bias made in a meta analysis of gender bias studies. The meta analysis examined correlations between implicit bias measures based on the gender Implicit Association Test, g IAT, and measures of intergroup, female and male, behavior. A second objective was to investigate general intelligence g and vocational, things people, interests as explanatory factors for gender differences in high ability careers. The p value plots constructed using data sets from the meta analysis did not support real associations between the tested variables. These findings reinforce the lack of correlation between g IAT, implicit bias, measures and real world gender behaviors in high ability careers. More demanding careers, attorneys, engineers, scientists, corporate executives, are recruited from people with higher g. One is dealing with gender groups and the group of high g females is smaller than high g males. Regarding vocational interests, females prefer working with people and males prefer working with things. STEM fields are typically things oriented. One is dealing with gender groups and the group of females who prefer working with things is smaller than the group of males. These facts make it predictable that there are more males in high complexity, things careers, STEM, academic medicine positions, than females. Implicit bias gIAT measures have little or no explanatory power for gender differences in high ability careers relative to g and interests in working with things.

Applications
Sex differences on elementary cognitive tasks despite no differences on the Wonderlic Personnel Test

Bryan J. Pesta,Sharon Bertsch,Peter J. Poznanski,William H. Bommer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.028

IF: 3.95

2008-10-01

Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract:Whether males and females differ in general mental ability (GMA) remains an open question. Complicating the issue is that standardized IQ tests are constructed to minimize sex differences. We propose a potential solution whereby GMA is measured via performance on elementary cognitive tasks (ECTs). ECTs assess basic information-processing ability, yet correlate moderately highly with GMA. Toward this end, we had male (n=218) and female (n=226) undergraduates complete the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), and two ECTs: inspection time (IT) and reaction time (RT). The sex difference on the WPT was non-significant (d=.17), but small differences favoring males existed for IT (d=.34), RT (d=.26), the standard deviation of RT (d=.30), and an ECT factor score (d=.38). Unlike standardized IQ tests, ECTs may be a viable research tool to help clarify and illuminate the nature of sex differences on GMA.

psychology, social

Gender fairness within the Force Concept Inventory

Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?

Exploring gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory using a random effects meta-analysis of international studies

Gender differences in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics: a UK cross-institution comparison

Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into Two Equivalent Half-Length Tests

Gender gap and polarisation of physics on global courses

Exploring the Structure of Misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with Modified Module Analysis

Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards

Examination of Gender-Related Differential Item Functioning Through Poly-BW Indices

Exploring the pre-instruction gender gap in physics.

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

The impact of stereotype threat on gender gap in introductory physics

Reducing the gender gap on adolescents' interest in study fields: The impact of perceived changes in ingroup gender norms and gender prototypicality

Examining gender differences in the use of multidimensional forced‐choice measures of personality in terms of test‐taker reactions and test fairness

The Communicative Participation Item Bank–Gender-Diverse Version: Item Bank Calibration and Short Form

Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields

Gender gap in standardized tests: What are we measuring?

The Relativity Concept Inventory: development, analysis and results

The reliability of the gender Implicit Association Test (gIAT) for high-ability careers

Sex differences on elementary cognitive tasks despite no differences on the Wonderlic Personnel Test