Rational design of Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide

Ning Han,Shihui Feng,Wei Guo,Omar Martinez Mora,Xiaolin Zhao,Wei Zhang,Sijie Xie,Zhenyu Zhou,Zhiwei Liu,Qiong Liu,Kai Wan,Xuan Zhang,Jan Fransaer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sus2.71
2022-06-05
SusMat
Abstract:The electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide through a 2e‐ transfer method of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has piqued the interest of both academics and industry. This article reported the Ruddlesden–‐Popper perovskite Pr2Ni1‐xMoxO4+δ as the highly selective and active catalysts for 2e‐ ORR to produce H2O2. The synthesized Pr2Ni1‐xMoxO4+δ displays better H2O2 selectivity than the parent perovskite Pr2NiO4+δ. For example, Pr2Ni0.8Mo0.2O4+δ displays 79% selectivity toward H2O2 at 0.55 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) during ORR, which is higher than the parent Pr2NiO4+δ (60%). This work advances the perovskite catalysts for 2e– ORR to H2O2. Although the oxygen reduction process to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a green option for H2O2 generation, the low activity and selectivity hindered the industry's process. In recent years, the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2 through a 2e– transfer method of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has piqued the interest of both academics and industry. Metal oxide catalysts have emerged as a novel family of electrochemical catalysts due to their unusual physical, chemical, and electrical characteristics. In this work, we first developed a Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite oxide (Pr2NiO4+δ) as a highly selective and active catalyst for 2e– ORR to produce H2O2. Molybdenum was introduced here to adjust the oxidation states of these transition metals with successful substitution into Ni‐site to prepare Pr2Ni1‐xMoxO4+δ, and the molybdenum substitution improves the H2O2 selectivity during the ORR process, in 0.1 M KOH, from 60% of Pr2NiO4+δ to 79% of Pr2Ni0.8Mo0.2O4+δ at 0.55 V versus RHE. A limiting H2O2 concentration of 0.24 mM for Pr2NiO4+δ and 0.42 mM for Pr2Ni0.8Mo0.2O4+δ was obtained at a constant current of 10 mA/cm2 using a flow‐cell reactor using a gas‐diffusion electrode.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?