Evaluation of renal osteodystrophy and serum bone‐related biomarkers in a peritoneal dialysis population

Luciano Pereira,Juliana Magalhães,Luís Mendonça,Ricardo Neto,Janete Santos,Catarina G Carvalho,Ana Oliveira,Ana Beco,João Frazão
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4636
IF: 6.39
2022-06-16
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Abstract:The spectrum of renal osteodystrophy (ROD) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients remains to be clarified. Ideal intact parathormone (iPTH) levels range still not defined. The role of sclerostin, dickkopf‐related protein 1, osteoprotegerin and receptor activator for nuclear factor kB ligand for the diagnosis of ROD needs to be elucidated. In this cross‐sectional study, tetracycline double‐labelled bone biopsy was performed in 49 patients with histomorphometric analysis according KDIGO guidelines. All patients were treated with biocompatible PD solutions, with calcium concentration of 1.25 mmol/L. Adynamic bone was the most frequent diagnosed pattern (42.9%) followed by hyperparathyroid‐related bone disease (28.6%). Twenty‐two percent of patients had normal bone. In patients with iPTH within the KDIGO recommended range for dialysis patients, adynamic bone was found in 59% of cases. Median iPTH in patients with adynamic bone was 312 (60–631) pg/mL. Median levels of sclerostin varied from 1511.64 pg/mL (458.84–6387.70) in patients with hyperparathyroid bone disease to 2433.1 pg/mL (1049.59–11354.52) in patients with adynamic bone. Sclerostin/iPTH ratio was the best marker of low turnover disease but iPTH performed best in the diagnosis of high turnover disease. Calcium mass transfer was positive in patients with low bone volume. Adynamic bone is the most frequent ROD pattern in contemporary PD. Our results suggest the need to review the iPTH target range for this population. The sclerostin/iPTH ratio showed improved performance compared to iPTH for the diagnosis of low turnover bone. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?