Territorializing polar heritage: cultural heritage as a means to exercise symbolic sovereignty in Antarctica

Rebecca Hingley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2094454
2022-08-02
Abstract:Cultural heritage in Antarctica is deployed by states for means other than conservation and preservation. Historic remains in this part of the world have come to represent powerful political resources, as well as vulnerable cultural assets. One of the primary geopolitical applications by states is the exercise of symbolic or de facto sovereignty in which states use heritage as a method to demonstrate their durable occupation of territory on and around the continent, and to affect decision-making processes within Antarctic affairs. Ultimately, dilapidated huts and piles of rocks provide states with tangible evidence to assert their past, present and intended future presence in the polar region. This paper investigates the notion of sovereignty within the Antarctic context, before selecting a case example to perform a geopolitical reading of one historic site. It reveals that just as the practice of international relations is often considered a zero-sum game, so can the governance of Antarctic cultural heritage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?