Abstract:Purpose: This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-1402O or bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by up to 24 weeks (8 cycles) of bevacizumab monotherapy. The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. ORR was analyzed per US Food and Drug Administration (ratio of ORR) and European Medicines Agency (difference in ORRs) requirements for equivalence evaluation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, safety, and immunogenicity over a period of 42 weeks, and pharmacokinetics (up to 18 weeks). Results: A total of 671 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. The ratio of ORR was 0.96 [confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR was −1.6 (CI −9.0, 5.9) between treatment arms; CIs were within the predefined equivalence margins. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity was transient, with no notable differences between treatment arms (6.5% versus 4.8% ADA positivity rate in MYL-1402O versus BEV, respectively). The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower in the MYL-1402O arm (0.6%) compared to the bevacizumab arm (2.5%). Conclusions: MYL-1402O is therapeutically equivalent to bevacizumab, based on the ORR analyses, with comparable secondary endpoints. Trial Registry Information EU Clinical Trials Register, Registration # EudraCT no. 2015-005141-32 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-005141-32 Plain language summary Previous studies established bioequivalence of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O to reference bevacizumab. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, MYL-1402O ( n = 337) demonstrated comparable efficacy to bevacizumab ( n = 334) in treating advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer per Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency requirements for equivalence; the ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 0.96 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR (MYL-1402O:bevacizumab) was −1.6 (95% CI −9.0, 5.9). Median progression-free survival at 42 weeks was comparable: 7.6 (7.0, 9.5) with MYL-1402O versus 9.0 (7.2, 9.7) months ( p = 0.0906) with bevacizumab, by independent review. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death (2.4% vs 1.5%), serious adverse events (17.6% vs 16.7%), and antidrug antibodies (6.5% vs 4.8%), were comparable in the MYL-1402O vs bevacizumab arms, respectively. The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower with MYL-1402O (0.6%) than with bevacizumab (2.5%). These findings confirm therapeutic equivalence of MYL-1402O to bevacizumab, providing opportunities for improving access to bevacizumab.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel phase I clinical trial to compare the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab in healthy Chinese subjects

Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence, Safety, and Immunogenicity of GB222, a Bevacizumab Biosimilar Candidate, and Bevacizumab in Chinese Healthy Males: a Randomized Clinical Trial

A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetic Equivalence of the Biosimilar IBI305 and Bevacizumab in Healthy Male Subjects .

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1101 with bevacizumab in healthy male subjects

A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetic Equivalence of TAB008 and Bevacizumab in Healthy Volunteers

Efficacy and safety of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar BAT1706 compared with reference bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of the BAT1706 (proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar) Compared with Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.

Phase 1 Studies Comparing Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of HLX01（a Rituximab Biosimilar） to Reference Rituximab in Chinese Patients with CD20-positive B-cell Lymphoma

Physicochemical and Functional Similarity Assessment Between Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar BAT1706 and Reference Bevacizumab

Efficacy and Safety of IBI305 Compared with Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC Patients As First-Line Treatment in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.

A randomized, single-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in healthy subjects to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic equivalence of trastuzumab and its biosimilar

Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Retrospective analysis of survival and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original drug combination chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab combination therapy in Chinese population with advanced non-squamous NSCLC: data of subgroup analyses from MO19390 (SAiL) study

104P Safety and Efficacy of HLX04 Versus Reference Bevacizumab in Combination with XELOX or Mfolfox6 As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomised, Double-Blind Phase III Study

Bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin) as first‐line treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non‐squamous non–small‐cell lung cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double‐blinded, phase III trial

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of a Bevacizumab Biosimilar, in Combination with Chemotherapies, in Nonresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study

Non-clinical pharmacology and toxicology studies of bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008

Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bevacizumab biosimilar candidate TAB008 compared to Avastin® in patients with locally advanced, metastatic EGFR wild-type non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study