Atrial Fibrillation Screen, Management, and Guideline-Recommended Therapy in the Rural Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of eHealth Tools to Support All Stages of Screening.

Jessica Orchard,Jialin Li,Ben Freedman,Ruth Webster,Glenn Salkeld,Charlotte Hespe,Robyn Gallagher,Anushka Patel,Bishoy Kamel,Lis Neubeck,Nicole Lowres
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017080
IF: 6.106
2020-09-02
Journal of the American Heart Association
Abstract:BACKGROUND Internationally, most atrial fibrillation (AF) management guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for AF in people ≥65 years of age and oral anticoagulant treatment for those at high stroke risk (CHA2DS2‐VA≥2). However, gaps remain in screening and treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS General practitioners/nurses at practices in rural Australia (n=8) screened eligible patients (≥65 years of age without AF) using a smartphone ECG during practice visits. eHealth tools included electronic prompts, guideline‐based electronic decision support, and regular data reports. Clinical audit tools extracted de‐identified data. Results were compared with an earlier study in metropolitan practices (n=8) and nonrandomized control practices (n=69). Cost‐effectiveness analysis compared population‐based screening with no screening and included screening, treatment, and hospitalization costs for stroke and serious bleeding events. Patients (n=3103, 34%) were screened (mean age, 75.1±6.8 years; 47% men) and 36 (1.2%) new AF cases were confirmed (mean age, 77.0 years; 64% men; mean CHA2DS2‐VA, 3.2). Oral anticoagulant treatment rates for patients with CHA2DS2‐VA≥2 were 82% (screen detected) versus 74% (preexisting AF)( P =NS), similar to metropolitan and nonrandomized control practices. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio for population‐based screening was AU ‐ 84 383 per stroke prevented compared with no screening. National implementation would prevent 147 strokes per year. Increasing the proportion screened to 75% would prevent 177 additional strokes per year. CONCLUSIONS An AF screening program in rural practices, supported by eHealth tools, screened 34% of eligible patients and was cost‐effective. Oral anticoagulant treatment rates were relatively high at baseline, trending upward during the study. Increasing the proportion screened would prevent many more strokes with minimal incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio change. eHealth tools, including data reports, may be a valuable addition to future programs. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au . Unique identifier: ACTRN12618000004268. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms AF atrial fibrillation EDS electronic decision support GP general practitioner iECG handheld single‐lead smartphone ECG ICER incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio NOAC non–vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulant OAC oral anticoagulant QALY quality‐adjusted life year QI quality improvement CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What Is New? This study extends the evidence base in rural areas by demonstrating that a screening program using eHealth tools in a rural general practice setting can successfully screen 34% of eligible patients with atrial fibrillation with guideline‐indicated treatment rates >80% for screen‐detected atrial fibrillation cases. Economic modeling showed that the program was cost‐effective compared with no screening. Oral anticoagulant treatment rates for eligible patients were higher than previous studies at baseline (>70%) and were trending upward during the study (around 80%). What Are the Clinical Implications? eHealth tools, particularly customized data reports as part of an audit and feedback system, may be a valuable addition to screening programs. Half of the practices screened 40% to 50% of eligible patients, suggesting that this may represent a ceiling of patients captured by opportunistic atrial fibrillation screening programs in the general practice setting. Increasing the proportion screened would prevent many more strokes with minimal change to the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio. < -Abstract Truncated-
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?