Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure–related cardiogenic shock
Jonas Sundermeyer,Caroline Kellner,Benedikt N. Beer,Lisa Besch,Angela Dettling,Letizia Fausta Bertoldi,Stefan Blankenberg,Jeroen Dauw,Zouhir Dindane,Dennis Eckner,Ingo Eitel,Tobias Graf,Patrick Horn,Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska,Paulus Kirchhof,Stefan Kluge,Axel Linke,Ulf Landmesser,Peter Luedike,Enzo Lüsebrink,Nicolas Majunke,Norman Mangner,Octavian Maniuc,Sven Möbius-Winkler,Peter Nordbeck,Martin Orban,Federico Pappalardo,Matthias Pauschinger,Michal Pazdernik,Alastair Proudfoot,Matthew Kelham,Tienush Rassaf,Clemens Scherer,Paul Christian Schulze,Robert H. G. Schwinger,Carsten Skurk,Marek Sramko,Guido Tavazzi,Holger Thiele,Luca Villanova,Nuccia Morici,Ephraim B. Winzer,Dirk Westermann,Benedikt Schrage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8
IF: 6.138
2024-02-15
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Abstract:Background Heart failure–related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of all CS cases. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on sex-related differences in HF-CS, especially regarding use of treatment and mortality risk in women vs. men. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and mortality between women and men with HF-CS. Methods In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS (without acute myocardial infarction) from 16 tertiary-care centers in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and 30-day mortality in women vs. men with HF-CS. Results N = 1030 patients with HF-CS were analyzed, of whom 290 (28.2%) were women. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older, less likely to have a known history of heart failure or cardiovascular risk factors, and lower rates of highly depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and renal dysfunction. Nevertheless, CS severity as well as use of treatments were comparable, and female sex was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (53.0% vs. 50.8%; adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75–1.19). Conclusions In this large HF-CS registry, sex disparities in risk factors and clinical presentation were observed. Despite these differences, the use of treatments was comparable, and both sexes exhibited similarly high mortality rates. Further research is necessary to evaluate if sex-tailored treatment, accounting for the differences in cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation, might improve outcomes in HF-CS.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems