Abstract:The Hebb effect refers to the improvement in immediate memory performance on a repeated list compared to unrepeated lists. That is, participants create a long-term memory representation over repetitions, on which they can draw in working memory tests. These long-term memory representations are likely formed by chunk acquisition: The whole list becomes integrated into a single unified representation. Previous research suggests that the formation of such chunks is rather inflexible and only occurs when at least the beginning of the list repeats across trials. However, recent work has shown that repetition learning strongly depends on participants recognizing the repeated information. Hence, successful chunk formation may depend on the recognizability of the repeated part of a list, and not on its position in the list. Across six experiments, we compared these two alternatives. We tested immediate serial recall of eight-letter lists, some of which partially repeated across trials. We used different partial-repetition structures, such as repeating only the first half of a list, or only every second item. We manipulated the salience of the repeating structure by spatially grouping and coloring the lists according to the repetition structure. We found that chunk formation is more flexible than previously assumed: Participants learned contiguous repeated sequences regardless of their position within the list, as long as they were able to recognize the repeated structure. Even when the repeated sequence occurred at varying positions over repetitions, learning was preserved when the repeated sequence was made salient by the spatial grouping. These findings suggest that chunk formation requires recognition of which items constitute a repeating group, and demonstrate a close link between grouping of information in working memory, and chunk formation in long-term memory.

Chunking, boosting, or offloading? Using serial position to investigate long-term memory's enhancement of verbal working memory performance

Promoting the experimental dialogue between working memory and chunking: Behavioral data and simulation

Working Memory Asymmetrically Modulates Auditory and Linguistic Processing of Speech.

Long-Term Effects of Working Memory Retrieval From Prioritized and Deprioritized States

Proactive interference of visual working memory chunks implicates long-term memory

Chunking by social relationship in working memory

The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory

Working memory task performance and chunking in early Alzheimer's disease

I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance

Chunking improves symbolic sequence processing and relies on working memory gating mechanisms

Connecting working and long-term memory: Bayesian-hierarchical multinomial model-based analyses reveal storage next to retrieval differences

The impact of working memory testing on long-term associative memory

Working memory processing boosts the neural representation of long-term memories

Adaptive chunking improves effective working memory capacity in a prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia circuit

What You See Is What You Remember: Visual Chunking by Temporal Integration Enhances Working Memory

Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

Chunking in working memory via content-free labels

Behavioral signatures of the rapid recruitment of long-term memory to overcome working memory capacity limits

Precursors to Chunking Vanish as Working Memory Capacity Is Exceeded

Grouping in working memory guides chunk formation in long-term memory: Evidence from the Hebb effect

Perceptual chunking and its effect on memory in speech processing: ERP and behavioral evidence