Revealing the Transient Formation Dynamics and Optoelectronic Properties of 2D Ruddlesden‐Popper Phases on 3D Perovskites

Tim Kodalle,Raphael F. Moral,Lucas Scalon,Rodrigo Szostak,Maged Abdelsamie,Paulo E. Marchezi,Ana F. Nogueira,Carolin M. Sutter‐Fella
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202201490
IF: 27.8
2022-07-01
Advanced Energy Materials
Abstract:This study uses in situ photoluminescence measurements to elucidate the formation dynamics of 2D Ruddlesden‐Popper (RP) phases on triple cation perovskite films using two different molecules (phenylethylammonium iodide and 2‐thiophenemethylammonium iodide). This study finds that the formation dynamics and final composition of the RP‐phases depend on the molecule used, opening opportunities to optimize the 2D‐passivation mechanisms individually, and improve solar cell efficiency. Using in situ photoluminescence measurements during the spin‐coating and annealing steps, this study probes the formation of 2D layers on 3D triple cation perovskite films comparing phenylethylammonium and 2‐thiophenemethylammonium iodide bulky cations. This study elucidates the formation mechanisms of the surface layers for both cases and reveals two regimes during 2D layer formation: a kinetic‐driven and a thermodynamic‐driven process. These driving forces result in different compositions of the 2D/3D interface for each treatment, namely, different ratios of pure 2D (n = 1) and quasi‐2D (n > 1) structures. This study shows that a higher ratio of quasi‐2D phases is more beneficial for device performance, as pure‐2D layers may hamper current extraction. Due to a more evenly distributed formation energy profile among 2D and quasi‐2D phases, highly concentrated 2‐thiophenemethylammonium iodide appears to be more suited for effective surface passivation than its phenylethylammonium analog.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?