Abstract:This article summarizes the arguments and counterarguments regarding the issue of academic dishonesty. The study’s main aim is to understand and initiate discussions about the widespread but disturbing problem of attrition in higher education institutions around the world. A systematization of literary sources and approaches to understanding university attrition has shown that a deep-rooted interplay of cultural, cross-cultural and social values contributes to academic dishonesty. The relevance of this issue and decisions that are considered necessary in this direction is that it will help educational institutions think about the need to develop a policy of academic integrity and control over strict compliance with the norms of this policy. The work uses a dual methodological approach involving quantitative and qualitative research methods. Within the framework of the quantitative method, a survey of students was conducted, which included a sample of 503 respondents. The purpose of the structured study of students is to determine their general perception of academic integrity, as well as to assess the extent of their use of information technology and compare it with their individual level of academic integrity. The qualitative method involved conducting interviews (in person and by telephone) and 25 focus group discussions among educational administrators regarding the prevalence of academic dishonesty in the academic environment. The internal consistency of the method was checked using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The article empirically confirms the results, which indicate that the traditional learning environment, the level of affluence in the family, and technological dependence contributed to non-compliance with the principles of academic dishonesty and a decrease in the quality of educational services. The results showed that the presence of a family business can significantly affect a student’s thinking and form a low level of tolerance for academic dishonesty (F=1.54, p=0.02). With the rapid spread of digital technology, Generation Z students depend highly on technology to support their educational endeavours (F=1.35, p=0.04). The results of the study offer a better understanding of the consequences of deviant academic behavior, the justification for increasing the responsibility of the subjects of the educational process for non-compliance with the principles of academic integrity and the importance of the institutional policy of the educational institution in regulating this issue.

Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review

A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments

Academic dishonesty in online English as a Foreign Language classroom

The ethical dissonance in digital and non-digital learning environments: Does technology promotes cheating among middle school students?

AI, biometric analysis, and emerging cheating detection systems: The engineering of academic integrity?

Cheating and plagiarism in higher education institutions (HEIs): A literature review

COVID-19 Academic Integrity Violations and Trends: A Rapid Review

Student Perspectives of Academic Integrity in an Online Environment: A Pilot Study

Collusion is still a tricky topic: student perspectives of academic integrity using assessment-specific examples in a science subject

Academic dishonesty in university nursing students: A scoping review

Two Sides of the Coin: Lack of Academic Integrity in Exams During the Corona Pandemic, Students' and Lecturers' Perceptions

Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors

Academic integrity in pre-service teacher education: a review of the literature

A study on academic dishonesty among English as a foreign language students

A Rapid Scoping Review on Academic Integrity and Algorithmic Writing Technologies

Collegiate cheating: understanding the prevalence, causes, and consequences

AI meets AI: Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity - A Survey on Mitigating AI-Assisted Cheating in Computing Education

Auto-assessment of assessment: A conceptual framework towards fulfilling the policy gaps in academic assessment practices

The Accuracy of AI-Based Automatic Proctoring in Online Exams

Student perceptions of academic misconduct amongst their peers during the rapid transition to remote instruction

Glitches and hitches: sessional academic staff viewpoints on academic integrity and academic misconduct