Does Incident Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Lower Blood Pressure?

Richard B. Weller,Yuedong Wang,Jingyi He,Franklin W. Maddux,Len Usvyat,Hanjie Zhang,Martin Feelisch,Peter Kotanko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013837
IF: 6.106
2020-02-29
Journal of the American Heart Association
Abstract:Background Hypertension remains a leading global cause for premature death and disease. Most treatment guidelines emphasize the importance of risk factors, but not all are known, modifiable, or easily avoided. Population blood pressure correlates with latitude and is lower in summer than winter. Seasonal variations in sunlight exposure account for these differences, with temperature believed to be the main contributor. Recent research indicates that UV light enhances nitric oxide availability by mobilizing storage forms in the skin, suggesting incident solar UV radiation may lower blood pressure. We tested this hypothesis by exploring the association between environmental UV exposure and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in a large cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients in whom SBP is determined regularly. Methods and Results We studied 342 457 patients (36% black, 64% white) at 2178 US dialysis centers over 3 years. Incident UV radiation and temperature data for each clinic location were retrieved from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration database. Linear mixed effects models with adjustment for ambient temperature, sex/age, body mass index, serum Na + /K + and other covariates were fitted to each location and combined estimates of associations calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird procedure. Pre‐dialysis SBP varied by season and was ≈4 mm Hg higher in black patients. Temperature, UVA and UVB were all linearly and inversely associated with SBP. This relationship remained statistically significant after correcting for temperature. Conclusions In hemodialysis patients, in addition to environmental temperature, incident solar UV radiation is associated with lower SBP. This raises the possibility that insufficient sunlight is a new risk factor for hypertension, perhaps even in the general population. Clinical Perspective What Is New? In a large North American cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients, incident solar ultraviolet radiation was found to be associated with lower systolic blood pressure, even after adjustment for environmental temperature, showing that human exposure to ultraviolet light contributes to blood pressure regulation and accounts for seasonal and geographical variation. What Are the Clinical Implications? While this is an observational study, our findings are consistent with data showing reduced blood pressure and lower rates of cardiovascular disease in populations with higher sun exposure, and suggest that Vitamin D independent benefits of sunlight should be considered when assessing risk benefit ratios. Sunlight exposure appears to lower blood pressure; insufficient exposure to natural ultraviolet radiation and/or active avoidance of sunlight may be new risk factors for hypertension. Hypertension is a leading global cause for premature disease and death, affecting >1 billion people worldwide. Its pathophysiology involves complex interactions of multiple genetic, behavioral/lifestyle‐related and environmental risk factors and social stressors with the endocrine, metabolic, autonomic nervous and cardiovascular systems. Without overt symptoms, hypertension can remain unrecognized and escape detection 1 for considerable time during which the raised blood pressure (BP) inflicts end‐organ damage. Multiple pharmacological and interventional treatment options exist but not all are well tolerated, in particular by older patients. There is convincing evidence from a large body of epidemiological data and clinical trials that BP lowering is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and mortality, especially from myocardial infarction and stroke. 2 , 3 The 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines 4 for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Management of Hypertension redefined what constitutes a "normal BP" to <120 mm Hg systolic and <80 mm Hg diastolic, irrespective of age, sensibly focusing on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in older patients. 5 While these aggressive diagnostic thresholds and treatment targets have not been adopted by the 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension 6 their impact is -Abstract Truncated-
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?