Abstract:Summary In this work, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are used for history matching data from core-scale countercurrent spontaneous imbibition (COUCSI) tests. To our knowledge, this is the first work exploring the variation in saturation function solutions from COUCSI tests. 1D flow was considered, in which two phases flow in opposite directions driven by capillary forces with one boundary open to flow. The partial differential equation (PDE) depends only on a saturation-dependent capillary diffusion coefficient (CDC). Static properties such as porosity, permeability, interfacial tension, and fluid viscosities are considered known. In contrast, the CDC or its components [relative permeability (RP) and capillary pressure (PC)], are considered unknown. We investigate the range of functions (CDCs or RP/PC combinations) that explain different (synthetic or real) experimental COUCSI data: recovery from varying extents of early-time and late-time periods, pressure transducers, and in-situ saturation profiles. History matching was performed by training a PINN to minimize a loss function based on observational data and terms related to the PDE, boundary, and initial conditions. The PINN model was generated with feedforward neural networks, Fourier/inverse-Fourier transformation, and an adaptive tanh activation function, and trained using full batching. The trainable parameters of both the neural networks and saturation functions (parameters in RP and PC correlations) were initialized randomly. The PINN method successfully matched the observed data and returned a range of possible saturation function solutions. When a full observed recovery curve was provided (recovery data reaching close to its final value), unique and correct CDC functions and correct spatial saturation profiles were obtained. However, different RP/PC combinations composing the CDC were calculated. For limited amounts of recovery data, different CDCs matched the observations equally well but predicted different recovery behavior beyond the collected data period. With limited recovery data, when all points were still following a square root of time trend, a CDC with a low magnitude and peak shifted to high saturations gave the same match as a CDC with a high magnitude and peak shifted to low saturations. Recovery data with sufficient points not being proportional to the square root of time strongly constrained how future recovery would behave and thus which CDCs could explain the results. Limited recovery data combined with an observed in-situ profile of saturations allowed for accurate determination of CDC and prediction of future recovery, suggesting in-situ data allowed for shortened experiments. With full recovery data, in-situ PC data calibrated the PC toward unique solutions matching the input. The RPs were determined, where their phase had much lower mobility than the others. The CDC is virtually independent of the highest fluid mobility, and RPs could not be matched at their high values. Adding artificial noise in the recovery data increased the variation of the estimated CDCs.

Physics‐informed neural networks with monotonicity constraints for Richardson‐Richards equation: Estimation of constitutive relationships and soil water flux density from volumetric water content measurements

A Multifidelity Neural Network (MFNN) for Constitutive Modeling of Complex Soil Behaviors

Simulating Field Soil Temperature Variations with Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Modeling water flow and solute transport in unsaturated soils using physics‐informed neural networks trained with geoelectrical data

Modeling water flow in unsaturated soils through physics-informed neural network with principled loss function

Inverse analysis of soil hydraulic parameters of layered soil profiles using physics‐informed neural networks with unsaturated water flow models

A PINN-based modelling approach for hydromechanical behaviour of unsaturated expansive soils

Application of improved physics-informed neural networks for nonlinear consolidation problems with continuous drainage boundary conditions

Physics‐Informed Neural Networks Trained With Time‐Lapse Geo‐Electrical Tomograms to Estimate Water Saturation, Permeability and Petrophysical Relations at Heterogeneous Soils

Novel physics informed-neural networks for estimation of hydraulic conductivity of green infrastructure as a performance metric by solving Richards–Richardson PDE

Prediction of Soil-Water Characteristic Curve Using Artificial Neural Network Approach

Data-driven forward and inverse analysis of two-dimensional soil consolidation using physics-informed neural network

Reconstructing unsaturated infiltration behavior with sparse data via physics-informed deep learning

A novel physics-informed neural networks approach (PINN-MT) to solve mass transfer in plant cells during drying

nn-PINNs: Non-Newtonian physics-informed neural networks for complex fluid modeling

Investigating Steady Unconfined Groundwater Flow using Physics Informed Neural Networks

Physics-informed neural network for solution of forward and inverse kinematic wave problems

Physics-informed neural networks for modeling two-phase steady state flow with capillary heterogeneity at varying flow conditions

Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Estimation of Saturation Functions from Countercurrent Spontaneous Imbibition Tests

Physics Informed Neural Networks Based on a Capacitance Resistance Model for Reservoirs Under Water Flooding Conditions

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Material Model Calibration from Full-Field Displacement Data