Abstract:Objective Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality proceeding from the initial severity and following complications during aSAH. Various scores were developed to predict these risks. We analyzed the clinical value of different radiographic scores for prognostication of aSAH outcome. Methods Initial computed tomography scans (≤48h after ictus) of 745 aSAH cases treated between 01/2003 and 06/2016 were reviewed for the SEBES, Claassen, BNI, Hijdra, original Graeb and Fisher scales. Primary endpoints were development of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), in‐hospital mortality and unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin scale score>3) at 6 months after SAH. Secondary endpoints included different complications during aSAH. Clinically relevant cut‐offs were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Radiographic scores with the highest values for the area under the curve (AUC) were included in the final multivariate analysis. Results The Hijdra sum score had the most accurate predictive value and independent associations with all primary endpoints: DCI (AUC=0.678, aOR=2.83, p<0.0001); in‐hospital mortality (AUC=0.704, aOR=2.83, p<0.0001) and unfavorable outcome (AUC=0.726, aOR=2.91, p<0.0001). Multivariate analyses confirmed independent predictive value of the radiographic scales for risk of decompressive craniectomy (SEBES & Fisher), cerebral vasospasm (SEBES, BNI & Fisher) and shunt dependency (Hijdra ventricle score & Fisher) after aSAH. Conclusions Initial radiographic severity of aSAH was independently associated with occurrence of different complications during aSAH and its final outcome. The Hijdra sum score showed highest diagnostic accuracy and robust predictive value for early detection of risk of DCI, in‐hospital mortality and unfavorable outcome after aSAH.

Comparing radiographic scores for prediction of complications and outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: which performs best?