Pathogen adaptation to vaccination: the Australian Bordetella pertussis story

Laurence Don Wai Luu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/MA19052
2019-11-19
Microbiology Australia
Abstract:Whooping cough (pertussis) is a highly contagious vaccine preventable respiratory disease caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Bordetella pertussis . Despite high level vaccination coverage over the past 20 years, Australia has one of the highest per capita burdens of pertussis globally. One of the primary factors associated with the re-emergence of pertussis is pathogen adaptation of B. pertussis to the current acellular vaccines used. This article will focus on the genomic and proteomic changes that have occurred in the Australian B. pertussis population, the significance of these adaptive changes on fitness in a vaccinated environment and what we can do to reduce the significant burden of pertussis in the future. Pertussis vaccinations were first introduced in Australia in 1953 using a whole cell vaccine (WCV), which contained dead B. pertussis cells. This led to a dramatic reduction in the number of pertussis notifications from 767 cases per 100 000 in the 1930s to one case per 100 000 by the late 1970s 1 . Despite the success of WCVs in reducing pertussis, reports of possible severe side-effects reduced public confidence in the vaccine and led to the replacement of the WCV with a new acellular vaccine (ACV) 2 . ACV was introduced into Australia in 1997, initially as a booster, and by 2000 it was used for all immunisations 2 . There are two ACVs used in Australia, the three component-ACV and the less widely used five-component ACV. The three-component ACV targets three virulence factors; pertussis toxin (Ptx), pertactin (Prn) and filamentous haemagglutinin (Fha), while the five-component vaccine targets two additional fimbriae (Fim2 and Fim3). Since the late 1990s, there has been a steady increase in pertussis notifications observed in Australia and in 2008–2012, Australia experienced a prolonged pertussis epidemic ( Figure 1 ). At the height of the epidemic in 2011, 174 cases per 100 000 were recorded, the highest number documented since the introduction of pertussis vaccination 2 . This was followed by a smaller yet still significant epidemic from 2014-2017 with a peak of 95 cases per 100 000 in 2015 3 ( Figure 1 ). Similar trends in increased notification rates have been noted in other countries that switched to the ACV 4 – 6 . To determine how B. pertussis is adapting to vaccine selection pressure, molecular epidemiology typing studies were performed to define the population structure and trace the evolution of B. pertussis in Australia from the pre-vaccination and WCV era to the ACV era. A previous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing study separated the global pertussis population into 6 SNP clusters (I-VI) based on 65 SNPs 7 . Australian B. pertussis isolates were mostly found in SNP clusters I-IV with SNP cluster V being a minor Australian cluster and SNP cluster VI containing vaccine and pre-vaccine strains. In the WCV period, SNP cluster II was the predominant cluster and was comprised of 33% of strains typed. After the switch to the ACV, the frequency of SNP cluster II isolates decreased to 11% and was replaced with SNP cluster I, which increased to 31% after it emerged during the WCV/ACV transition period 7 ( Figure 2 ). Since the 2008–2012 epidemic, the majority (>90%) of circulating strains in Australia belong to SNP cluster I 3 , 8 . Most current circulating strains in other ACV countries typed as ptxP3 strains are equivalent to SNP cluster I 9 . The replacement of the WCV with ACV in Australia reduced the number of antigens targeted from hundreds to 3-5 ( Figure 2 ). This has placed greater selection pressure on genes encoding ACV antigens to change and allow for vaccine escape variants to emerge in Australia. There are two major evolutionary changes observed due to increased vaccine selection pressure: ACV allelic divergence and inactivation of ACV antigen expression ( Figure 2 ). The greatest ACV allelic divergence is seen in ptxA and prn alleles. SNP cluster I carries the prn2 and ptxA1 alleles which encode antigenic variants that differ from the prn1 and ptxA2 alleles in Tohama I, the strain used to produce the W -Abstract Truncated-
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?