Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicted prognosis for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)

Fangping Ren,Tian Zhao,Bing Liu,Lei Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S199176
IF: 4
2019-10-07
OncoTargets and Therapy
Abstract:Fangping Ren, 1,* Tian Zhao, 2,* Bing Liu, 3 Lei Pan 1 1 Department of Respiratory, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 161st Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, 430010, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Disease Control and Prevention, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic value of blood neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Materials and methods: 147 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study from June 30, 2013, to August 30, 2017. Survival analysis used the Kaplan and Meier methodology. The mean follow-up time was 2.6 years. The phenotypic T cells subtypes were evaluated by flow cytometry. Results: Of these patients, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were used to confirm the cut-off value, and patients were stratified into NLR>2.5 (n=88) and NLR≤2.5 (n=59) groups. Survival analysis showed that patients with NLR≤2.5 had significantly favorable overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with NLR>2.5. After stratified with the tumor mutational burden (TMB), we further found that patients with NLR≤2.5 had significantly favorable OS and PFS compared with patients with NLR>2.5 in the group of patients with TMB>10, while in group patients with TMB≤10, patients with NLR≤2.5 had no significantly favorable OS and PFS compared with patients with NLR>2.5. The CD3 + and CD8 + /CD28 + T cell subsets were significantly increased in patients with NLR≤2.5 ( P <0.05), while the CD8 + /CD28 − and CD4 + /CD25 + cell subsets were significantly decreased in patients with NLR≤2.5 ( P <0.05). Conclusion: High NLR value independently predicted poorer survival in advanced NSCLC patients received ICB therapy. The NLR may help oncologists to predict outcomes of patients received ICB and choose alternative therapies for patients with high NLR value. Keywords: NLR, NSCLC, ICB
oncology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?