Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles in epidemiological studies: Comparing the Olink and SOMAscan platforms

Danielle E. Haslam,Jun Li,Simon T. Dillon,Xuesong Gu,Yin Cao,Oana A. Zeleznik,Naoko Sasamoto,Xuehong Zhang,A. Heather Eliassen,Liming Liang,Meir J. Stampfer,Samia Mora,Zsu‐Zsu Chen,Kathryn L. Terry,Robert E. Gerszten,Frank B. Hu,Andrew T. Chan,Towia A. Libermann,Shilpa N. Bhupathiraju
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202100170
2022-05-24
Abstract:Limited data exist on the performance of high‐throughput proteomics profiling in epidemiological settings, including the impact of specimen collection and within‐person variability over time. Thus, the Olink (972 proteins) and SOMAscan7Kv4.1 (7,322 proteoforms of 6,596 proteins) assays were utilized to measure protein concentrations in archived plasma samples from the Nurses' Health Studies and Health Professionals Follow‐Up Study. Spearman's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess agreement between 1) 42 triplicate samples processed immediately, 24‐hr, or 48‐hr after blood collection; and 2) 80 plasma samples from 40 participants collected 1‐yr apart. When comparing samples processed immediately, 24‐hr, and 48‐hr later, 55% of assays had an ICC/r≥0.75 and 87% had an ICC/r≥0.40 in Olink compared to 41% with an ICC/r≥0.75 and 71% with an ICC/r≥0.40 in SOMAscan7K. For both platforms, > 90% of the assays were stable (ICC/r≥0.40) in samples collected 1‐yr apart. Among 817 proteins measured with both platforms, Spearman's correlations were high (r > 0.75) for 14.7% and poor (r
What problem does this paper attempt to address?