Abstract:Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency general surgical conditions worldwide. Uncomplicated/simple appendicitis can be treated with appendectomy or antibiotics. Some studies have suggested possible benefits with antibiotics with reduced complications, length of hospital stay, and the number of days off work. However, surgery may improve success of treatment as antibiotic treatment is associated with recurrence and future need for surgery. To assess the effects of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated/simple acute appendicitis compared with appendectomy for resolution of symptoms and complications. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registers (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov) on 19 July 2022. We also searched for unpublished studies in conference proceedings together with reference checking and citation search. There were no restrictions on date, publication status, or language of publication. We included parallel‐group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only. We included studies where most participants were adults with uncomplicated/simple appendicitis. Interventions included antibiotics (by any route) compared with appendectomy (open or laparoscopic). We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Primary outcomes included mortality and success of treatment, and secondary outcomes included number of participants requiring appendectomy in the antibiotic group, complications, pain, length of hospital stay, sick leave, malignancy in the antibiotic group, negative appendectomy rate, and quality of life. Success of treatment definitions were heterogeneous although mainly based on resolution of symptoms rather than incorporation of long‐term recurrence or need for surgery in the antibiotic group. We included 13 studies in the review covering 1675 participants randomised to antibiotics and 1683 participants randomised to appendectomy. One study was unpublished. All were conducted in secondary care and two studies received pharmaceutical funding. All studies used broad‐spectrum antibiotic regimens expected to cover gastrointestinal bacteria. Most studies used predominantly laparoscopic surgery, but some included mainly open procedures. Six studies included adults and children. Almost all studies aimed to exclude participants with complicated appendicitis prior to randomisation, although one study included 12% with perforation. The diagnostic technique was clinical assessment and imaging in most studies. Only one study limited inclusion by sex (male only). Follow‐up ranged from hospital admission only to seven years. Certainty of evidence was mainly affected by risk of bias (due to lack of blinding and loss to follow‐up) and imprecision. Primary outcomes It is uncertain whether there was any difference in mortality due to the very low‐certainty evidence (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 4.95; 1 study, 492 participants). There may be 76 more people per 1000 having unsuccessful treatment in the antibiotic group compared with surgery, which did not reach our predefined level for clinical significance (risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96; I 2 = 69%; 7 studies, 2471 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes At one year, 30.7% (95% CI 24.0 to 37.8; I 2 = 80%; 9 studies, 1396 participants) of participants in the antibiotic group required appendectomy or, alternatively, more than two‐thirds of antibiotic‐treated participants avoided surgery in the first year, but the evidence is very uncertain. Regarding complications, it is uncertain whether there is any difference in episodes of Clostridium difficile diarrhoea due to very low‐certainty evidence (Peto OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.89; 1 study, 1332 participants). There may be a clinically significant reduction in wound infections with antibiotics (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.68; I 2 = 16%; 9 studies, 2606 participants; low‐certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether antibiotics affect the incidence of intra‐abdominal abscess or collection (RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.61 to 4.07; I 2 = 19%; 6 studies, 1831 participants), or reoperation (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.16; 1 study, 492 participants) due to very low‐certainty evidence, mainly due to rare events causing imprecision and risk of bias. It is uncertain if antibiotics prolonged length of hospital stay by half a day due to the very low‐certainty evidence (MD 0.54, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.01; I 2 = 97%; 11 studies, 3192 participants). The incidence of malignancy was 0.3% (95% CI 0 to 1.5; 5 studies, 403 participants) in the antibiotic group although follow‐up was variable. Antibiotics probably increased the number of negative appendectomies at surgery (RR 3.16, 95% CI 1.54 to 6.49; I 2< -Abstract Truncated-

CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children: a randomised controlled feasibility Trial (CONTRACT)

Initial non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (APAC trial)

Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: a Pilot Study.

Non‐operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a randomized, controlled, non‐inferiority study evaluating safety and efficacy

Parental preferences in treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis comparing surgery to conservative management with antibiotics and their views on research participation

Parental Views on the Non-Operative Management of Simple Appendicitis in Children: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey

Optimising the Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (OPTIMA Trial): a Protocol for a Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Study

Suspected Simple Appendicitis in Children: Should We Use a Nonoperative, Antibiotic-Free Approach? An Observational Study

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial

Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis

Impact of a procalcitonin-based algorithm on the quality of management of patients with uncomplicated adhesion-related small bowel obstruction assessed by a textbook outcome: a multicenter cluster-randomized open-label controlled trial

The Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy for Acute Appendicitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children

Nonsurgical Management of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: the Analysis of Treatment Outcome in Relationship with Antimicrobial Regimens and Adverse Prognostic Factors

Randomised multicentre effectiveness trial of rapid syndromic testing by panel assay in children presenting to European emergency departments with acute respiratory infections--trial protocol for the ADEQUATE Paediatric trial

Role of preoperative in-hospital delay on appendiceal perforation while awaiting appendicectomy (PERFECT): a Nordic, pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

Preventing adverse events during paediatric cancer treatment: protocol for a multi-site hybrid randomised controlled trial of catheter lock solutions (the CLOCK trial)

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus appendectomy or antibiotics in the modern approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Conservative management versus invasive management of significant traumatic pneumothoraces in the emergency department (the CoMiTED trial): a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial

Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study

Outpatient management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial