Abstract:Plant–soil feedback (PSF), plant trait and functional group concepts advanced our understanding of plant community dynamics, but how they are interlinked is poorly known. To test how plant functional groups (FGs: graminoids, small herbs, tall herbs, legumes) and plant traits relate to PSF, we grew 48 grassland species in sterilized soil, sterilized soil with own species soil inoculum and sterilized soil with soil inoculum from all species, and quantified relative growth rate (RGR), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL) and per cent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization (%AMF). Plant growth response to the plant species' own soil biota relative to sterilized soil (PSFsterilized) reflects net effects of all (generalist + specialized) soil biota. Growth response to the plant species' own soil biota relative to soil biota of all plant species (PSFaway) reveals effects of more specialized soil organisms. PSFsterilized showed that graminoids and small herbs have a negative and tall herbs a positive response to their own soil biota, whereas legumes responded neutrally. However, PSFaway showed that on average, all plant FGs benefitted from growing with other species' soil biota, suggesting that pathogens are more specialized than plant growth‐promoting soil biota. Feedback to plant growth from all soil biota (PSFsterilized) was stronger than from more specialized soil biota (PSFaway) and could be predicted by SRL and especially by %AMF colonization. Species with high SRL and low %AMF colonization when grown in away soil experienced most negative soil feedback. Synthesis. Plant species from all plant FGs grow better in soil from other species because of less net negative effects of soil biota (in graminoids), or because of more net positive soil biota effects (in tall herbs). Explorative plant species (high SRL, low %AMF colonization) suffer most from negative feedback of all soil biota, whereas more resource conservative species (low SRL, high %AMF colonization) benefit from soil feedback of all soil biota. These findings help to understand replacement of explorative species during succession. Moreover, we suggest a potentially larger role for species with positive feedback than for species with negative feedback to contribute to maintain plant community productivity of diverse communities over time. Plant species from all plant FGs grow better in soil from other species because of less net negative effects of soil biota (in graminoids), or because of more net positive soil biota effects (in tall herbs). Explorative plant species (high SRL, low %AMF colonization) suffer most from negative feedback of all soil biota, whereas more resource conservative species (low SRL, high %AMF colonization) benefit from soil feedback of all soil biota. These findings help to understand replacement of explorative species during succession. Moreover, we suggest a potentially larger role for species with positive feedback than for species with negative feedback to contribute to maintain plant community productivity of diverse communities over time.

Plant-soil feedbacks persist following tree death, reducing survival and growth of Populus tremuloides seedlings

Splitting the Difference: Heterogeneous Soil Moisture Availability Affects Aboveground and Belowground Reserve and Mass Allocation in Trembling Aspen

Synthesis of plant-soil feedback effects on eastern North American tree species: implications for climate-adaptive forestry

Removal of soil biota alters soil feedback effects on plant growth and defense chemistry

Root exudates and rhizosphere microbiomes jointly determine temporal shifts in plant-soil feedbacks.

Functional shifts in soil fungal communities regulate differential tree species establishment during subalpine forest succession

Soil microbial legacies influence plant survival and growth in mine reclamation

Do plant–soil feedbacks promote coexistence in a sagebrush steppe?

Biotic and abiotic plant–soil feedback depends on nitrogen‐acquisition strategy and shifts during long‐term ecosystem development

Plant–soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits

Effect of soil warming on growth and physiology of aspen seedlings from Alberta, Canada

The Importance of Initial Seedling Characteristics in Controlling Allocation to Growth and Reserves under Different Soil Moisture Conditions

Increasing soil age drives shifts in plant-plant interactions from positive to negative and affects primary succession dynamics in a subalpine glacier forefield

Mechanism of plant-soil feedback in a degraded alpine grassland, Tibetan Plateau

Invertebrate-induced priority effects and secondary metabolites control fungal community composition in dead wood

Environmental Influences on Density and Height Growth of Natural Ponderosa Pine Regeneration following Wildfires

Intraspecific plant–soil feedback in four tropical tree species is inconsistent in a field experiment

Zooming in on the temporal dimensions of plant–soil feedback: Plant sensitivity and microbial dynamics

The Legacy Effect of Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks on the Chemical and Anatomical Defences of Surviving Lodgepole Pine Trees

The Contrasting Effects of Aspen and Jack Pine on Soil Nutritional Properties Depend on Parent Material

Effects of soil treatments and tree species on reforestation of well pads