Abstract:Purpose The authors test the effect of expenditure decentralization and fiscal equalization on short- and long-run economic growth and estimate two-step generalized method of moment (GMM) simultaneous equations models, using panel data for China and India for the period 1985 to 2005. The authors estimate two simultaneous equations: a growth equation and equalization equation and find that expenditure decentralization has a negative and statistically significant effect at conventional levels on short-run economic growth for both China and India. However, the authors also find that this result is sensitive to the set of included explanatory variables. This leads the authors to conclude that expenditure decentralization has no effect on short-run economic growth for either country. The authors also find that expenditure decentralization has a positive and statistically significant effect on fiscal equalization for both countries but find no evidence that fiscal equalization affects short-run economic growth for either China or India. In contrast, the authors find that expenditure decentralization has a positive effect on long-run economic growth in the case of India, but not in the case of China. Finally, the authors report evidence that fiscal equalization has no effect on long-run economic growth in the case of China; however, the authors find that equalization has a positive and statistically significant at conventional levels effect on long-run economic growth in India. Design/methodology/approach The authors estimate two-step GMM simultaneous equations models, using panel data for China and India for the period 1985 to 2005. To examine the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) policies on economic growth in China and India, the authors estimate two equations: a growth equation and an equalization equation. For the growth equation, the authors adopt a production-function-based model that is widely used in the empirical literature on growth; however, the authors do make some compromises with this specification due to the unavailability of certain data. For the equalization equation, the authors include variables that economic theory and empirical evidence suggest influence fiscal disparities among subnational governments which in turn influence the demand for horizontal fiscal equalization (HFE). To the extent possible, the authors employ the same econometric specification, variable constructions and sample periods for both China and India. The authors believe this strategy provides a more rigorous test of the FD hypothesis. Findings The authors find that expenditure decentralization has a negative and statistically significant effect at conventional levels on short-run economic growth for both China and India. However, the authors also find that this result is sensitive to the set of included explanatory variables. This leads to conclude that expenditure decentralization has no effect on short-run economic growth for either country. The authors also find that expenditure decentralization has a positive and statistically significant effect on fiscal equalization for both countries but find no evidence that fiscal equalization affects short-run economic growth for either China or India. In contrast, the authors find that expenditure decentralization has a positive effect on long-run economic growth in the case of India, but not in the case of China. Finally, the authors report evidence that fiscal equalization has no effect on long-run economic growth in the case of China; however, the authors find that equalization has a positive and statistically significant at conventional levels effect on long-run economic growth in India. Research limitations/implications Due to the importance of FD policies, especially to many developing countries that are currently pursuing decentralization reforms, future research should examine the effect of FD on economic growth for other countries. Furthermore, although it would be difficult to do so, future research should examine whether FD promotes political stability on ethnically diverse countries. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no one has examined the effect of FD policies on India's growth experience. What is more is that this is also the first of its kind to have a comprehensive empirical investigation into these two major developing countries with very interesting similarities and differences in FD policies. It is thus of great importance to examine the effect of expenditure decentralization and HFE on economic growth in China and India.

Does financial development foster economic globalization in emerging economies? Time series evidence from China and India

How do financial globalization, institutions and economic growth impact financial sector development in European countries?

Law, Institutions, and Finance in China and India

Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows

Do economic globalization and the level of education impede poverty levels? A non-linear ARDL approach

Does fiscal decentralization promote economic growth? An empirical approach to the study of China and India

Financial Markets, Financial Institutions and International Trade: Examining the causal links for Indian Economy

The Promoting Effect of Financial Development on Economic Growth: Evidence from China

Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of 16 African and non-African low-income countries

Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: Can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development?

Does globalization accelerate economic growth? South Asian experience using panel data

Determinants of Financial Development in Top and Bottom Remittances and FDI Inflows Recipient Developing Regions—How Does Institutional Quality Matter?

Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization

Stock market development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from China

The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries

Does inflation affect asymmetrically to financial development in India? Fresh insights based on NARDL approach

The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies

Financial Development, Real Estate Investment and Economic Growth

Financial Development: The Role of GDP per Capita Dynamics in Low- & Middle-Income Economies

Impact of Financial Development, Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth on Financial Instability: Evidence from Panel Data

Asymmetric and time-varying linkages between carbon emissions, globalization, natural resources and financial development in China