Abstract:Importance: Knowledge regarding the long-term outcomes of elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is increasing. However, data with greater than 10 years' follow-up remain sparse and are lacking from population-based studies. Objective: To determine the long-term outcomes of EVAR compared with open surgical repair (OSR) for elective treatment of AAA. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used linked administrative health data from Ontario, Canada, to identify all patients 40 years and older who underwent elective EVAR or OSR for AAA repair from April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2016, with follow-up terminating on March 31, 2017. A total of 17 683 patients were identified using validated procedure and billing codes and were propensity score matched. Analysis was conducted from June 26, 2018, to January 16, 2019. Exposures: Elective EVAR or OSR for AAA. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival, defined as being free of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; reintervention; and secondary rupture. Results: Among 17 683 patients who received elective AAA repairs (mean [SD] age, 72.6 [7.8] years; 14 286 [80.8%] men), 6100 (34.5%) underwent EVAR and 11 583 (65.5%) underwent OSR. From these patients, 4010 well-balanced propensity score-matched pairs of patients were defined, with a mean (SD) age of 73.0 (7.6) years and 6583 (82.1%) men. In the matched cohort, the mean (SD) follow-up was 4.4 (2.7) years, and maximum follow-up was 13.8 years. The overall median survival was 8.9 years. Compared with OSR, EVAR was associated with a higher survival rate up to 1 year after repair (91.0% [95% CI, 90.1%-91.9%] vs 94.0% [95% CI, 93.3%-94.7%]) and a higher major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival rate up to 4 years after repair (69.9% [95% CI, 68.3%-71.3%] vs 72.9% [95% CI, 71.4%-74.4%]). Cumulative incidence of reintervention was higher among patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR at the 7-year follow-up (45.9% [95% CI, 44.1%-47.8%] vs 42.2% [95% CI, 40.4%-44.0%]). Survival analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences in long-term survival, reintervention, and secondary rupture for patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested superior long-term major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival among patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR (32.6% [95% CI, 26.9%-38.4%] vs 14.1% [95% CI, 4.0%-30.4%]; stratified log-rank P < .001) during a maximum follow-up of 13.8 years. Conclusions and relevance: Endovascular aortic repair was not associated with a difference in long-term survival during more than 13 years' maximum follow-up. The reasons for these findings will require studies to consider specific graft makes and models, adherence to instructions for use, and types and reasons for reintervention.

Racial disparities in presentation and outcomes for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Racial and sex disparities in inpatient outcomes of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States

African Americans have worse outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A national inpatient sample analysis from 2015 to 2020

Racial and ethnic differences in presentation severity and postoperative outcomes in vascular surgery

Effect of EVAR on International Ruptured AAA Mortality—Sex and Geographic Disparities

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care in the United States

Racial disparities in thoracic aortic surgery: Myth or reality?

Trends in mortality among the geriatric population undergoing Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and potential racial disparities: a 20-year perspective via the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Valve Replacement Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States, 2012-2019

Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Chinese Population.

343 Regional Variability in the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage for Black Patients: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and End-of-life Care.

Outcomes Following Intact and Ruptured Aneurysm Repair across Nations: Analysis of International Registries Data from the VASCUNET Collaboration 2014 – 2019 †

Racial disparities in TAVR outcomes in patients with cancer

Variation in care in individuals hospitalised with abdominal aortic aneurysm in nine high-income countries: a cross-sectional cohort study

Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A county hospital experience

Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Ethnic & Sex Disparities in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: An International Perspective

Impact of Race on Outcomes in the Endovascular and Microsurgical Treatment in Patients With Intracranial Aneurysms

The impact of endovascular stents types on perioperative outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single-center experience

Comparison Between Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-Selected and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-Only Strategies for the Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: an 11-Year Experience at a Chinese Tertiary Hospital