Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

NANOG prion-like assembly mediates DNA bridging to facilitate chromatin reorganization and activation of pluripotency

Context-Dependent Functions of NANOG Phosphorylation in Pluripotency and Reprogramming

PHC1 maintains pluripotency by organizing genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus

NANOG-dependent function of TET1 and TET2 in establishment of pluripotency

Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development

Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog

Pluripotency Activity of Nanog Requires Biochemical Stabilization by Variant Histone Protein H2a.Z

Pluripotential competence of cells associated with Nanog activity

Kru euro ppel-like factor 5 rewires NANOG regulatory network to activate human naive pluripotency specific LTR7Ys and promote naive pluripotency

Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion

The molecular logic of Nanog-induced self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells

NANOG alone induces germ cells in primed epiblast in vitro by activation of enhancers

Nanog Induced Intermediate State in Regulating Stem Cell Differentiation and Reprogramming.

Chromatin lncRNA Platr10 controls stem cell pluripotency by coordinating an intrachromosomal regulatory network

Locus-Specific Isolation of the Nanog Chromatin Identifies Regulators Relevant to Pluripotency of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Reprogramming of Somatic Cells

Concise Review: Pursuing Self-Renewal and Pluripotency with the Stem Cell Factor Nanog

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations

Nanog regulates molecules involved in stemness and cell cycle-signaling pathway for maintenance of pluripotency of P19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells

Nanog overcomes reprogramming barriers and induces pluripotency in minimal conditions

Transcriptional Regulation of Nanog by OCT4 and SOX2

ZFP281 Coordinates DNMT3 and TET1 for Transcriptional and Epigenetic Control in Pluripotent State Transitions