Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles To Predict the Presence of Carbapenemase Genes among Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates

Snigdha Vallabhaneni,Jennifer Y Huang,Julian E Grass,Amelia Bhatnagar,Sarah Sabour,Joseph D Lutgring,Davina Campbell,Maria Karlsson,Alexander J Kallen,Elizabeth Nazarian,Emily A Snavely,Shannon Morris,Chun Wang,Rachel Lee,Myong Koag,Robert Lewis,Bobbiejean Garcia,Allison C Brown,Maroya Spalding Walters,Jennifer Y. Huang,Julian E. Grass,Joseph D. Lutgring,Alexander J. Kallen,Emily A. Snavely,Allison C. Brown
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02874-20
2021-05-20
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Abstract:Detection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) with carbapenemase-producing (CP) genes is critical for preventing transmission. Our objective was to assess whether certain antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) profiles can efficiently identify CP-CRPA. We defined CRPA as P. aeruginosa with imipenem or meropenem MICs of ≥8 μg/ml; CP-CRPA was CRPA with CP genes ( bla KPC / bla IMP / bla NDM / bla OXA-48 / bla VIM ). We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of AST profiles to detect CP-CRPA among CRPA isolates collected by CDC's Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) and the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) during 2017 to 2019. Three percent (195/6,192) of AR Lab Network CRPA isolates were CP-CRPA. Among CRPA isolates, adding not susceptible (NS) to cefepime or ceftazidime to the definition had 91% sensitivity and 50% specificity for identifying CP-CRPA; adding NS to ceftolozane-tazobactam had 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity. Of 965 EIP CRPA isolates evaluated for CP genes, 7 were identified as CP-CRPA; 6 of the 7 were NS to cefepime and ceftazidime, and all 7 were NS to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Among 4,182 EIP isolates, clinical laboratory AST results were available for 96% of them for cefepime, 80% for ceftazidime, and 4% for ceftolozane-tazobactam. The number of CRPA isolates needed to test (NNT) to identify one CP-CRPA isolate decreased from 138 to 64 if the definition of NS to cefepime or ceftazidime was used and to 7 with NS to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Adding not susceptible to cefepime or ceftazidime to CRPA carbapenemase testing criteria would reduce the NNT by half and can be implemented in most clinical laboratories; adding not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam could be even more predictive once AST for this drug is more widely available.
microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?