Abstract:IntroductionEven in a well-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment will alter the measurement of alignment. This could influence the radiographic outcome of TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment after TKA and to establish a re-calculation of this rotation by using existing radiographic landmarks.Materials and methodsSynthetic femur and tibia (Sawbones®, Inc. Vashon Island, WA) were used to create a TKA of the Triathlon® knee prosthesis system (Stryker®, Limerick, Ireland). The femoral alignment was 6.5° valgus. The model was fixed in an upright stand. Five series of nine anteroposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were taken on a 30 cm × 120 cm plates in full extension with the limb rotated, in 5° increments, from 20° external rotation to 20° internal rotation. After digitizing each radiograph (Scanner Hewlett Packard XJ 527), an observer measured the anatomic mechanical angle of the femur [AMA (°)], the mechanical lateral proximal femur angle [mLPFA (°)], the mechanical lateral distal femur angle [mLDFA (°)], the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle [mMPTA (°)] and the mechanical lateral distal tibia angle [mLDTA (°)] using a digital measurement software (MediCAD®, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Besides, the observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the long leg radiograph. A ratio of one distance to another was measured (called femoral component distance ratio).ResultsThe average radiographic anatomic alignment ranged from 6.827° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° internal rotation to 4.627° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLPFA (°) ranged from 101.63° (SD = 0.63) in 20° internal rotation to 93.60° (SD = 0.74°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDFA (°) ranged from 90.59° (SD = 3.01°) in 20° internal rotation to 86.76° (SD = 0.36°) in 20° external rotation. Average mMPTA (°) ranged from 90.35° (SD = 0.81°) in 20° internal rotation to 88.49° (SD = 0.52°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDTA (°) ranged from 98.89° (SD = 2.3°) in 20° internal rotation to 90.53° (SD = 3.39°) in 20° external rotation. Without an application of limb rotation, the femoral component distance ratio was measured to be 0.89 (SD = 0.01), in 20° internal rotation 0.63 (SD = 0.01) and in 20° external rotation 1.16 (SD = 0.01).DiscussionLimb rotation had a highly statistically significant effect on measured anatomic alignment and mechanical angles. A correlation between limb rotation, anatomic mechanical angle, mechanical angles measured at femur and tibia and the femoral component distance ratio was established. As the anatomic mechanical angle and the femoral component distance ratio change linearly in the range of 20° internal and external limb rotation, a calculation of the femoral component distance ratio could be used to re-calculate the limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment to evaluate the evidence of a long leg radiograph.

Metal Artifact Reduction Dual-Energy CT as an Accurate and Reliable Method for Measuring Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Rotation Compared to Conventional CT

Digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction for assessing cementless hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic cohort study of 48 patients

Anatomical Reference of the Femur after Distal Resection Is Reliable for Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total Knee Replacement for Posttraumatic Degenerative Arthritis of the Knee.

Advanced Imaging of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Image quality and metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty CT: deep learning-based algorithm versus virtual monoenergetic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome

Measurement of femoral posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope in normal knees based on 3D reconstruction

The Effects of Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee on the Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component: Gap Balancing Technique versus Measured Resection Technique

Quantitative Analysis of Rotational Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis

Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study

Reduction of metal artifacts from unilateral hip arthroplasty on dual-energy CT with metal artifact reduction software

The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty

Determining the Femoral Prothesis Rotational Certification by CT in Total Knee Arthroplasty

CT Validation of Intraoperative Implant Position and Knee Alignment as Determined by the MAKO Total Knee Arthroplasty System

Comparison of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithms in Patients with Hip Prostheses: Virtual Monoenergetic Images vs. Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction

CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: for artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar

Improved Component Placement Accuracy with Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of CT and EOS in assessing coronal lower limb alignment when planning total knee arthroplasty

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties