Operationalizing marketable blue carbon
Peter I. Macreadie,Alistar I. Robertson,Bernadette Spinks,Matthew P. Adams,Jennifer M. Atchison,Justine Bell-James,Brett A. Bryan,Long Chu,Karen Filbee-Dexter,Lauren Drake,Carlos M. Duarte,Daniel A. Friess,Felipe Gonzalez,R. Quentin Grafton,Kate J. Helmstedt,Melanie Kaebernick,Jeffrey Kelleway,Gary A. Kendrick,Hilary Kennedy,Catherine E. Lovelock,J. Patrick Megonigal,Damien T. Maher,Emily Pidgeon,Abbie A. Rogers,Rob Sturgiss,Stacey M. Trevathan-Tackett,Melissa Wartman,Kerrie A. Wilson,Kerrylee Rogers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.005
IF: 14.944
2022-05-20
One Earth
Abstract:The global carbon sequestration and avoided emissions potentially achieved via blue carbon is high (∼3% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions); however, it is limited by multidisciplinary and interacting uncertainties spanning the social, governance, financial, and technological dimensions. We compiled a transdisciplinary team of experts to elucidate these challenges and identify a way forward. Key actions to enhance blue carbon as a natural climate solution include improving policy and legal arrangements to ensure equitable sharing of benefits; improving stewardship by incorporating indigenous knowledge and values; clarifying property rights; improving financial approaches and accounting tools to incorporate co-benefits; developing technological solutions for measuring blue carbon sequestration at low cost; and resolving knowledge gaps regarding blue carbon cycles. Implementing these actions and operationalizing blue carbon will achieve measurable changes to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, provide multiple co-benefits, and address national obligations associated with international agreements.