Abstract:Objective Our primary objective was to verify the hypothesis that synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is similar to conventional MRI in detecting sacroiliac joint lesions in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). A secondary objective was to assess the quantitative value of synthetic mapping in bone marrow edema (BME) and fat metaplasia. Methods A total of 132 axSpA patients who underwent synthetic and conventional MRI from October 2019 to March 2021 were included in this prospective study. Two independent readers visually evaluated active inflammatory (BME, capsulitis, enthesitis, and inflammation at site of erosion) and structural lesions (erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis, and fat metaplasia) of the sacroiliac joints on conventional and synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) images. In addition, T1, T2, and proton density (PD) values, which were generated by synthetic mapping, were used to further quantitatively evaluate BME and fat metaplasia. A McNemar test was used to compare the differences between the two methods in the detection of sacroiliac joint lesions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the inter-reader consistency of quantitative values. Mann–Whitney tests were performed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for all quantitative analyses. Results There were no statistical difference between synthetic and conventional MRI in the detection of sacroiliac joint lesions (all p -values > 0.05). A total of 103 images of BME and 111 images of fat metaplasia were quantitatively evaluated using T1, T2, and PD values. The consistency of quantitative values among readers was good (ICC 0.903–0.970). T1 and T2 values were consistently higher in BME than in normal marrow ( p < 0.001), but PD values were not significantly different ( p = 0.830). T2 and PD values were higher in fat metaplasia than in normal marrow, but T1 values were lower ( p < 0.001). In the case of BME, T1 values had greater diagnostic efficiency [area under the curve (AUC) 0.99] than T2 values (AUC 0.78). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic efficiency of T1 (AUC 0.88), T2 (AUC 0.88), and PD (AUC 0.88) values in the case of fat metaplasia. Conclusion Synthetic MRI is as effective as conventional MRI in detecting sacroiliac joint lesions in patients with axSpA. Furthermore, synthetic mapping can accurately quantify BME and fat metaplasia.

Diagnostic evaluation of the sacroiliac joints for axial spondyloarthritis: should MRI replace radiography?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study

Comparing MRI and conventional radiography for the detection of structural changes indicative of axial spondyloarthritis in the ASAS cohort

Is it time to move on from pelvic radiography as the first-line imaging modality for suspected sacroiliitis?

Current Role of Conventional Radiography of Sacroiliac Joints in Adults and Juveniles with Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: Opinion from the ESSR Arthritis and Pediatric Subcommittees

Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis: Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Detection of structural lesions of the sacroiliac joints in patients with spondyloarthritis: A comparison of T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo MRI and MRI-based synthetic CT versus T1-weighted turbo spin echo MRI

Diagnostic accuracy in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic evaluation of the role of clinical information in the interpretation of sacroiliac joint imaging

Role of MRI in Diagnosis of Sacro-iliac Joint Lesions

Significance of structural changes in the sacroiliac joints of patients with axial spondyloarthritis detected by MRI related to patients symptoms and functioning

Role of advanced MRI techniques for sacroiliitis assessment and quantification

Are we overcalling sacroiliitis on MRI? Differential diagnosis that every rheumatologist should know - Part I

The role of sacro-iliac joint magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: focus on differential diagnosis in women

Frequency and anatomic distribution of magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the sacroiliac joints of spondyloarthritis and non-spondyloarthritis patients

The contribution of imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of axial spondyloarthritis

Reporting Sacroiliac Joint Imaging Performed for Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Recommendations

Tomosynthesis performance compared to radiography and computed tomography for sacroiliac joint structural damage detection in patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis

Central reader evaluation of MRI scans of the sacroiliac joints from the ASAS classification cohort: discrepancies with local readers and impact on the performance of the ASAS criteria

Spondyloarthropathy - Is sacroiliac joint imaging sufficient? A study of 431 patients

Synthetic MRI in the detection and quantitative evaluation of sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarthritis