The US–China Trade War: Economic Statecraft, Multinational Corporations, and Public Opinion

Shiping Hua,Ka Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.18

IF: 2.457

2022-11-06

Business and Politics

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1469356922000180/resource/name/firstPage-S1469356922000180a.jpg

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Politics and Economics of the US-China Trade War

Deborah L. Swenson,Thye Woo,Wing Thye Woo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497883

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:The US declared trade war after substantial defections from the internationalist (in geo-strategy and economics) lobby in US politics to a new coalition between conflict-is-inevitable proponents and anti-globalization activists. Many internationalist businesses changed sides after experiencing disappointments on economic fronts including China's non-compliance with some of its WTO obligations; China's acquisition of foreign technology at lower-than-expected prices; and the serious inadequacies in the WTO's governance of global trade. Many of the disillusioned internationalists have given too much weight to the contribution of globalization to negative developments in the US labor market, and too little weight to the role of powerful capital-biased technological changes and to the inadequacies of state-provided programs for social insurance and human capital formation. Resolution of the trade war and prevention of its frequent occurrence will become more likely when (a) China adopts much greater reciprocity in its economic engagement with the advanced countries despite its status as a developing country under WTO rules; and (b) US stops equating geostrategic competition with economic competition; recognizes that economic dynamism and economic resilience comes from strengthening indigenous innovation capability rather than from holding China back technologically; and institutes social programs to significantly reduce the trauma that is created by frequent job changes. Deep reform of WTO is urgently needed but is unlikely to happen in the medium run. For the medium-run, the US should mobilize country cooperation in regional settings (like the TPP) to introduce policy innovations to serve as templates for a re-designed WTO architecture, and to harness collective market power to be used in future negotiations on WTO reform.
Towards Economic Decoupling? Mapping Chinese Discourse on the China–US Trade War

Li Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz017

2019-01-01

The Chinese Journal of International Politics

Abstract:Abstract Tremendous changes have occurred in China–US relations since Donald J. Trump took office in the White House, but the most significant event is the outbreak of the China–US trade war, whose unprecedented scale and impact has drawn wide attention in China and sparked considerable debate. This article aims to review the four main stages of this great debate on the China–US trade war among China’s influential intellectuals and prominent thinkers. It covers the three-year period since beginning of the Trump administration. The initial argument among Chinese academics was whether or not there could ever be a trade war, which led to a dividing line between optimists and pessimists. Soon after, when China-US relations took a sharp downturn and a trade war seemed inevitable, Chinese scholars shifted their focus to reasons why the United States should wage a trade war against China. This culminated in three different perspectives embodied respectively in the structural conflict theory, institutional conflict theory, and the theory on exporting domestic problems. After China and the United States began slapping additional tariffs on one another’s exported goods, and with the flare-up of the Zhongxing Telecommunication Equipment Corporation (ZTE) and Huawei incidents, the debate on how to respond to a trade war cleaved between the ‘whole nation system school’ and the ‘market reform school’. As to coping with the technology war, Chinese intellectuals were divided between the paths of ‘independent innovation’ and ‘open innovation’. More recently, in view of the many signs that the China–US trade war could continue indefinitely, and an economic decoupling of the two nations is no longer unimaginable, a fierce debate has arisen between those that advocate full preparations for such economic decoupling and those who insist on further links with the US economy. Although the main themes of the four stages of the debate differ somewhat, they share a certain degree of consistency as regards the conceptual pedigree of the debating parties. Their divergence derives, in essence, from different perspectives on such issues as state power versus market force, independence versus interdependence, and zero-sum competition of power versus win-win economic cooperation. This also exemplifies the competing views in Chinese academia on classical political economy.
From Economic Cooperation to Strategic Competition: Understanding the US-China Trade Disputes through the Transformed Relations

Zhaohui Wang,Jinghan Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09652-0

2020-02-08

Journal of Chinese Political Science

Abstract:This article investigates the escalation of US-China trade disputes and the implications for Sino-US relations. Both structural realism and liberal institutionalism have failed to pay sufficient attention to the evolution of the US-China economic relationship, and this article strives to highlight this crucial issue. The article employs a historical perspective to examine the transformation of US-China economic relations in the twenty-first century. It argues that the US-China economic relationship is evolving from a symbiotic but asymmetric one between 2001 and 2008, toward an increasingly competitive one after the 2008 global financial crisis, especially in the Trump-Xi era. The changing dynamics of US-China economic relations, as well as the shifting perceptions of the top leadership of each country toward the other, create the impetus for the transformation of Sino-US relations. This article suggests that the recent trade tension is embedded in the growing strategic competition between the two countries.

area studies,political science
The Dimensions of the US-China Trade War

Mohamad Zreik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2020-0004

2020-04-22

Open Political Science

Abstract:Abstract The Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a statement Friday morning, July 6, 2018, confirming the outbreak of a trade war between the United States and China. The statement came after the United States imposed tariffs on many Chinese goods, in violation of international and bilateral agreements, and the destruction of the concept of free trade which the United States calls for following it. It is a war of opposite directions, especially the contradiction between the new Trump policy and the Chinese approach. The proof is what US Defense Secretary James Matisse announced in Singapore in early June 2018 of “ the full strategy of the new United States, in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific ,” where China was the “ sole enemy of the United States ” in China’s geostrategic region. Intentions have become publicized, and trade war between the two economic giants is turning into a reality. This paper will give an overview of the US-China scenario of trade war, then a focused analysis on the Trump’s administration economic decision regarding China, and the consequences of this decision.
Understanding the US-China Trade War: Causes, Consequences and Economic Impact

Ram Kumar Mishra,M Karthik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2020095

2020-11-01

Global Trade and Customs Journal

Abstract:A trade war is a situation in which countries restrict each other’s trade by imposing tariffs or quota on imports. A latest example of a trade war is the one currently going on between the US and China. China with its large manufacturing base has captured the world markets. China’s growth is viewed as a threat to America’s supremacy in world trade. We focus on trade history and explore the trade statistics of China and the United States, the factors that led to the trade war, the journey of China in WTO and America’s appeal to amend WTO rules to ensure fair play. We also outline the outcome of the current war in terms of trade diversion, trade beneficiaries, reaction of NASDAQ (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations) and Shanghai stock exchange (SSE), & the impact it has on the consumers.
The China–US Trade War: Deep‐Rooted Causes, Shifting Focus and Uncertain Prospects

Chi Hung Kwan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12284

IF: 3

2019-09-16

Asian Economic Policy Review

Abstract:<p>The USA has waged a trade war against China, whose rapid rise has come to be seen as a threat to US hegemony. Besides imposing additional tariffs on imported Chinese products, the USA is also tightening restrictions on the transfer of technology to China and the business activities of some Chinese high‐tech companies, notably Huawei. The escalation of the trade war into a tech war could lead to a decoupling between the US and Chinese economies, if not a world economy divided into two economic blocs that centered on them.</p>

economics
Interpreting US-China Trade War Background, Negotiations and Consequences

Wang Yong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-019-00019-6

2019-01-01

China International Strategy Review

Abstract:Since March 2018, the US–China trade conflict has escalated from a tariff war to a technology war and the strategic competition between the two giants, and the direction of the trade war and China–US relations will reshape the world order of the future. The questions the paper attempts to explore include what major goals does the US have in the trade war against China? How should one evaluate the influence of the domestic structural changes of the two countries upon the trade conflict? Will a possible deal stop the spiraling of the strategic competition between the two major powers? By answering these questions, the paper gives analysis of the political and economic driving forces behind the US–China trade war and the factors affecting the consequences of the negotiations. The major arguments include that the trade frictions have deep roots in the restructuring of domestic politics taking place in the two countries; while extreme thoughts define the US–China relationship from the perspectives of ideology and strategic rivalry, economic interdependence and shared stakes set the ground for negotiation and possible compromise between the two countries; and rebuilding political trust will be the key to dealing with strategic rivalry and avoiding the new cold war between China and the US.
Role of Economy in Foreign Policy: An Appraisal of US-China Trade War in the Prism of Political Economy

Niyamat Ullah,Amir Jan,Abdul Waheed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.27

2024-02-28

Abstract:The intertwining of economics and foreign policy has become increasingly evident in the modern geopolitical landscape, with the US-China trade war as a prominent case study. This critical abstract examines the significance of economic considerations in shaping foreign policy decisions, particularly in the context of the US-China trade war, through the lens of political economy. The US-China trade war, initiated in 2018, symbolizes the complex interplay between economic interests and political objectives. At its core, the conflict represents a strategic maneuver by the United States to address longstanding grievances regarding trade imbalances, intellectual property theft, and market access restrictions. Conversely, China's response reflects its aspiration to assert itself as a global economic powerhouse and safeguard its developmental model against external pressures. Through a political economy perspective, this abstract delves into the multifaceted dynamics driving the US-China trade war. Economic theories, such as mercantilism and comparative advantage, offer insights into the motivations behind both nations' protectionist measures and tariff escalations. Moreover, the abstract evaluates the efficacy of economic coercion as a foreign policy tool and its implications for international relations. While tariffs and trade barriers can pressure adversaries, they also entail risks, such as retaliatory measures, economic volatility, and unintended consequences. Additionally, the abstract examines the role of domestic politics and interest groups in shaping the trajectory of the trade war, highlighting the interplay between economic nationalism, electoral dynamics, and policy formulation.
Introduction To The Special Issue On Understanding The Current China-U.S. 'Trade War'

Miaojie Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2019.1616919

2019-01-01

China Economic Journal

Abstract:One of the most important international economic events in 2018 was the China-U.S. "trade war." With China's growing role in the worldwide economy and geopolitical impacts, the United States has labeled China as a strategy competitor. This notes briefly introduce the six articles covered in the volume. We highlight the causes and possible economic consequences from the perspectives of the United States, China, Japan, the Europe, and even East Asian countries like Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries.
An analysis of the China–US trade war through the lens of the trade literature

Larry D. Qiu,Chaoqun Zhan,Xing Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2019.1595329

2019-04-03

Economic and Political Studies

Abstract:The current China–US trade war that started in early 2018 has been the largest of this kind in the global market in the past half century, if not longer. Many speculations about the reasons for and progress and potential implications of the trade war emerge. Countries must understand the reasons for the war to avoid future trade wars. Predicting what will happen in the near future and the related economic consequences are even more important for people (including businessmen and government policymakers) to prepare for them and make corresponding decisions. However, endeavouring to predict is a tough job. This paper tries to provide an unbiased analysis through the lens of the trade literature. That is, we want to ask how much we can understand the current trade war on the basis of the accumulated knowledge we can obtain from our profession. Related theories include imperfect competition, increasing returns, terms of trade argument, distributional effects and political economy argument.
Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War

Tao Liu,Thye Woo,Wing Thye Woo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2018.1516256

2018-09-02

China Economic Journal

Abstract:Three major concerns drove the U.S. into initiating the trade war, and they are (a) the concern that China’s chronically large trade surplus was depressing job creation in the U.S. (b) the concern that China was using illegal and unfair methods to acquire U.S. technology at an effectively discounted price; and (c) the concern that China seeks to weaken U.S. national security and its international standing. On the dispute over China’s exchange rate and trade imbalance, the first conclusion is that it was marked by analytical confusion over the meaning of the term ‘equilibrium exchange rate’. The second conclusion is that China’s trade imbalance reflects the economic conditions in both China and U.S., and that the efficient and fair solution of the problem requires policy changes in both countries. On the industrial policy dispute, the first conclusion is that the issue of forced technology transfer is largely a dispute about China using its market power to benefit itself at the expense of its trade partners. The second conclusion is that China’s use of market power can last only until the other large countries could unite and retaliate as a group. The inevitability of retaliation means that China should replace the joint-venture (JV) mechanism for technological diffusion with other ways to strengthen its technological capability. On the U.S. concern about whether China trade weakens its national security, the first conclusion is that the notion of national security that is commonly adopted in the U.S. trade policy debate is ignorant about the primary determinants of U.S. capability in innovation. By focusing instead mainly on how to hold down China technologically, the long-run outcome will be a technologically weaker U.S. and hence, a more vulnerable U.S. The second conclusion is that the U.S. must identify a clear, short list of critical technologies and critical infrastructure for the recently reformed Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to cover, and update this list constantly. Otherwise, the broad and changing nature of notions about national security would allow the bureaucratically driven phenomenon of mission-creep to steadily expand the coverage of the CFIUS process, thereby steadily rendering CFIUS to be operationally capricious. Our principal policy suggestion to China is that, because China’s economy in 2018 is very different from that in 1978 (e.g. many parts of China now look like Singapore and China is Africa’s biggest donor), there should be more reciprocity in China’s trade and investment relations with the advanced economies despite China’s status as a developing economy under WTO rules. Our principal policy suggestion to President Trump is to stop equating strategic competition with economic competition. Strategic competition is normally a zero-sum game. While fair economic competition is usually a zero-sum game in the short run, it generally creates a win-win outcome in the long run.
Analysis of the Inevitability of the US-China Trade War Based on the Differences in the Economic Development Models of China and the US

Yuqi Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/88/20241048

2024-06-10

Abstract:This paper examines the ongoing trade conflict between China and the United States, two of the world's largest economies, whose rivalry has significant repercussions for the international trading system, global supply chains, and transnational economic relations. At the heart of this conflict are deep-seated issues related to trade imbalances, intellectual property protection, and global strategic competition, which challenge the existing frameworks of international trade and cooperation. Employing a comparative political economy approach, this study delves into the economic development models of both nations, analyzing their economic policies, trade practices, and international strategic orientations to understand the inevitable frictions that arise from their interactions. The objective is to uncover the underlying causes of these trade tensions and their broader implications for the global economic landscape. Furthermore, the paper offers strategic recommendations for adjusting international trade policies to foster better cooperation and reduce conflicts, thereby enhancing the stability and functionality of the global economy.
The emergence of China, Inc.: behind and beyond the trade war

Shaomin Li,Matthew Farrell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-12-2019-1103

IF: 3.422

2020-05-13

International Journal of Emerging Markets

Abstract:Purpose Answering the call to study important issues in the real world (Buckley et al. , 2017; Delios, 2017; Phan, 2019), and motivated by the trade war between the US and China, the authors look beyond it to examine the more fundamental issues behind it. From a political economy perspective, the authors examine the interplay of government, society and firms in China to identify new phenomena that may impact business with, and research on, China. Design/methodology/approach A multi-case qualitative method is used to present and analyze evidence and develop our arguments. Specifically, we use scholarly sources, anecdotal evidence, reports, statistics and government documents and policies to support our arguments. Findings After four decades of economic reform, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) controls every aspect of the society. Living, working and doing business are not a right but a privilege granted by the party. To a great degree, state-owned firms are business units/subsidiaries, and private/foreign firms are franchisees of the party, with the party leader being the CEO of China, Inc. The interplay between China and other countries is essentially a competition between a huge corporation and other states. Practical implications At the firm level, our study suggests that for MNCs dealing with Chinese firms, they need to know that Chinese firms are units of China, Inc. Practitioners should take into account the long-term strategic goals of the CCP as well as business considerations when dealing with Chinese partners or competitors. Social implications At the country level, our study shows that other countries dealing with China must be aware that they are dealing with a huge corporation. Originality/value That the CCP runs China as a corporation is a new perspective that will help the international community reexamine global competition.

management,business,economics
A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily

Fu Chen,Guofeng Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1844252

IF: 1.642

2020-11-23

Critical Discourse Studies

Abstract:The ongoing Sino-U.S. trade dispute between the world's two largest economies has since 2018 attracted much attention from the international media. This study used the approach of corpus-assisted discourse studies to compare how leading English-language newspapers from each side—The New York Times (NYT) and China Daily (CD) — discursively constructed this issue. The findings indicated that while NYT tended to profile the trade conflict as a 'war' in line with mainstream hard-line ideologies that emphasize China's presumed threat to national security of the U.S., CD sought to dial down the rhetoric and showed a preference for defining the matter as a 'friction', consistent with the tenet of 'pragmatic nationalism' endorsed by the Communist Party of China. Accordingly, the two newspapers framed the causes, moral evaluation/consequences, and treatment of the issue in congruence with their respective dominant metaphors by means of various linguistic patterns. These differences are interpreted with regard to each side's underlying ideologies and national interests.

communication
A skeletal review of the Sino-U.S. “trade war”: contentious issues, trade multilateralism and policy recommendations

Manjiao Chi,Liang Qiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2019.1685557

2019-11-18

Canadian Foreign Policy Journal

Abstract:The recent US trade policy change during the past two years has given rise to a series of trade frictions between the U.S. and many other countries. The Sino-U.S. trade war is probably the most intense and significant aspect of these trade frictions. While the U.S. resorts to trade protectionism and unilateralism in pursuit for a fair trade order, China tries to set up an image of a defender of trade multilateralism centered on the WTO. Neither the U.S. nor China will benefit from the trade war. While the U.S. would suffer from erosion of its leadership and credibility, China would face immense difficulty in the future if the persistent global concerns over its economic model remain unaddressed. The trade war necessitates the international community to reflect on the notion of fair trade order and to take measures to realize it.
How US and Chinese Media Cover the US–China Trade Conflict: A Case Study of War and Peace Journalism Practice and the Foreign Policy Equilibrium Hypothesis

Louisa Ha,Yang Yang,Rik Ray,Frankline Matanji,Peiqin Chen,Ke Guo,Nan Lyu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12186

2020-07-07

Negotiation and Conflict Management Research

Abstract:<p>This article examines the news coverage of a nonmilitary conflict: The US–China trade conflict by major news media outlets in the USA and China using the war and peace journalism framework. Role in the conflict as initiator/responder, medium difference, the press role in each press system, and partisanship of news media were hypothesized to affect the war and peace journalism practice. Moreover, the trade conflict was divided into three stages to test the applicability of the "foreign policy market equilibrium hypothesis" by analyzing the changes in the uses of sources and presence of competing frames over time. US news media were found to employ more war journalism and less peace journalism than their Chinese counterpart. They also had much lower coverage of the conflict than their Chinese counterpart. Newspapers were more likely to use war journalism than television. US partisan liberal media selectively supported and opposed the US government trade policy.</p>

management,psychology, applied
US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes

Larisa Kapustina,Ľudmila Lipková,Yakov Silin,Andrei Drevalev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207301012

2020-01-01

SHS Web of Conferences

Abstract:The article reviews the chronology and analyses the causes and possible consequences of the trade war between the US and China. The authors identify four main reasons that led to the greatest trade conflict between the two economies in history associated with intentions of the US: a) to reduce the deficit of bilateral trade and increase the number of jobs; b) to limit access of Chinese companies to American technologies and prevent digital modernization of the industry in the PRC; c) to prevent the growth of China’s military strength; and d) to reduce the federal budget deficit. It is confirmed and concluded that trade wars have no winners. Taking into account the two countries’ GDP scale and export volumes, the US-China trade war will come amid a slowdown in the global production and international trade. The article analyses the outcomes of the trade confrontation based on the scenario methodology. The authors identify 4 scenarios by making assumptions about the response pattern and conjectural variation in the bilateral economic relations. The US protectionist policy has its political dimension. The constraints of the bilateral trade is one of the tools for slowing China's military and economic power growth.
How Should China Respond to Trump’s New Round of Trade War? An Unprecedented Debate Among Chinese IR Scholars

Weizhan Meng,Xinkai Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020042

IF: 0.845

2020-12-01

Journal of World Trade

Abstract:The US-China trade war finally broke out in 2018 after more than a decade of gradual decline in bilateral relations. This article reviews the fierce debates among China’s most prominent international relations (IR) scholars and, respectively, some economists and business elites on various topics related to US-China relations, in particular, the trade war, from 2017 to 2020. Specifically, it addresses four topics: the causes for the decline in US-China relations, Beijing’s policy and strategy for dealing with Trump’s trade war, the impact of the ‘decoupling’ on China and the prospects for future bilateral relations. Intellectual elites try to influence government policies by participating in debates while the government also applies various means to influence scholars’ views and shape public opinion on the Internet. The article finds that Chinese scholars’ discussions on the trade war and Beijing’s policies were actually influenced by factors other than trade. If Washington adopts appropriate policies in the future, Beijing may still make concessions in the interests of the United States on trade and security issues.

economics,international relations,law
Americans’ Attitudes toward the US–China Trade War

Yongai Jin,Shawn Dorius,Yu Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1926089

IF: 3.126

2021-06-14

Journal of Contemporary China

Abstract:The US public holds more nuanced views about China than are typically captured in public opinion surveys. Empirical investigation of a nationwide online survey of US adults shows that the American public is sharply divided over the US–China trade war, despite reporting high support for international trade with China (76%). Using survey questions on US–China trade and the trade war, a typology was developed that indicates more than 40% of US adults support trade with China but oppose the trade war. A slightly smaller share has a more economically militant view of trade with China, supporting trade and the trade war. Political identity is strongly associated with attitudes toward the trade war, but only weakly associated with attitudes toward trade with China. Perceptions about China and its government, people, and culture are highly correlated with views on trade with China but are unrelated to views on the trade war.

area studies
External coercion and public support: The case of the US–China trade war

Jiahua Yue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433231221437

2024-02-23

Journal of Peace Research

Abstract:Journal of Peace Research, Ahead of Print. Domestic support is crucial for state leaders facing international challenges. Previous studies suggest that in both democracies and autocracies, citizens tend to support their government in resisting external coercion, and state leaders would pay high political costs for backing down, especially after they have publicly committed to standing firm. But it is also frequently assumed that the public would grow weary of international conflict and turn to peaceful settlement. Empirical research on how and why this presumed shift in public opinion would take place remains relatively scarce. This article tackles this issue by examining the dynamics of Chinese public opinion during the US–China trade war in 2018. With a two-wave survey of Chinese citizens, I explore how the government's strategy affected public approval through two causal mechanisms: the state's reputation for resolve and economic impact. I find that respondents' support for standing firm was strengthened by gains in reputation for resolve but attenuated by anticipated economic losses. I also find that respondents were more sensitive to the anticipated economic losses of a prolonged trade war over time and that respondents' preferences were constantly conditional on their pre-existing anti-American sentiment. These findings illuminate the nuanced considerations of an authoritarian audience whose calculations extend beyond sheer nationalist beliefs and dynamically respond to changing circumstances.

political science,international relations

The US–China Trade War: Economic Statecraft, Multinational Corporations, and Public Opinion

The Politics and Economics of the US-China Trade War

Towards Economic Decoupling? Mapping Chinese Discourse on the China–US Trade War

From Economic Cooperation to Strategic Competition: Understanding the US-China Trade Disputes through the Transformed Relations

The Dimensions of the US-China Trade War

Understanding the US-China Trade War: Causes, Consequences and Economic Impact

The China–US Trade War: Deep‐Rooted Causes, Shifting Focus and Uncertain Prospects

Interpreting US-China Trade War Background, Negotiations and Consequences

Role of Economy in Foreign Policy: An Appraisal of US-China Trade War in the Prism of Political Economy

Introduction To The Special Issue On Understanding The Current China-U.S. 'Trade War'

An analysis of the China–US trade war through the lens of the trade literature

Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War

Analysis of the Inevitability of the US-China Trade War Based on the Differences in the Economic Development Models of China and the US

The emergence of China, Inc.: behind and beyond the trade war

A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily

A skeletal review of the Sino-U.S. “trade war”: contentious issues, trade multilateralism and policy recommendations

How US and Chinese Media Cover the US–China Trade Conflict: A Case Study of War and Peace Journalism Practice and the Foreign Policy Equilibrium Hypothesis

US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes

How Should China Respond to Trump’s New Round of Trade War? An Unprecedented Debate Among Chinese IR Scholars

Americans’ Attitudes toward the US–China Trade War

External coercion and public support: The case of the US–China trade war