Abstract:Cognitive warfare is not new. Weaker parties in an asymmetric conflict have manipulated information and ideas to convince stronger opponents to not fight (e.g., the Trojan Horse). What is new is the extent to which technologies enable cognitive warfare – resulting in the delegitimization of governments by sowing discord and creating division in order to compel acceptance of political will Information sharing tools enable adversaries to interfere more directly than ever with national political processes as well as citizens minds3. Cognitive warfare is considered a new domain of warfare, along with land, maritime, air, space and cyber (technical). The goal of cognitive warfare attacks is to alter or mislead the thoughts of leaders and operators, of members of entire social or professional classes, of the men and women in an army, or on a larger scale, of an entire population in a given region, country or group of countries and impact territory, influence, service interruptions, transportation, etc. The means could be social cyber, cyber technical, electronic warfare, and broadcast, etc. Senior officers and strategists in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) claim that AI, neuroscience, and digital applications (e.g., social media) will be able to influence enemies by affecting human cognition directly, Russia’s Gerasimov doctrine talks of the “battlespace of the mind”, Pocheptsov provides examples including creation of fake events and objects and organizing protest actions in Ukraine. Dr Giordano stated, “the brain is the battlefield of the future”. This paper will highlight current examples of cognitive warfare, touch on enabling technologies and relevant social science principles of influence (cognitive and social), highlight existing analytics, introduce the “House model” which identifies pillars of relevant fields of knowledge as well as operationally relevant aspects related to the pillars as potentially helpful framework for thinking about cognitive warfare and identifying needed research.

Language, Cognition, and Drone Warfare: Applying Cognitive Linguistic Tools in the Critical Analysis of Drone Discourses

Drone warfare- A Gray area

The Art of Drone Warfare

Assistant, Parrot, or Colonizing Loudspeaker? ChatGPT Metaphors for Developing Critical AI Literacies

Drone methodologies: Taking flight in human and physical geography

Applied Cognitive Linguistics

An Ontology-Based Approach to Metaphor Cognitive Computation

What Drives the Use of Metaphorical Language? Negative Insights from Abstractness, Affect, Discourse Coherence and Contextualized Word Representations

New perspectives on cognitive warfare

The rise of large language models: challenges for Critical Discourse Studies

Language and Politics: Framing the Use of Conceptual Metaphors in Political Discourse

Beyond drone vision: the embodied telepresence of first-person-view drone flight

"What activism can learn from poetry": Lyric Opacity and Drone Warfare in Solmaz Sharif’s LOOK

The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis

Cognitive Rhetoric

The Language Labyrinth: Constructive Critique on the Terminology Used in the AI Discourse

Representation, conceptualization and positioning in Critical Discourse Analysis

Cognitive approach experience to the metaphor analysis (on the basis of the navy language)

Beyond cognitive metaphor theory : perspectives on literary metaphor

Cognitive Metaphor and Discourse: Research Methods and Paradigms

Why Ideology Matters for Learning: A Case of Ideological Convergence in an Engineering Ethics Classroom Discussion on Drone Warfare