Abstract:Background Dynamic contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (DCE‐US) is highly susceptible to motion artifacts arising from patient movement, respiration, and operator handling and experience. Motion artifacts can be especially problematic in the context of perfusion quantification. In conventional 2D DCE‐US, motion correction (MC) algorithms take advantage of accompanying side‐by‐side anatomical B‐Mode images that contain time‐stable features. However, current commercial models of 3D DCE‐US do not provide side‐by‐side B‐Mode images, which makes MC challenging. Purpose This work introduces a novel MC algorithm for 3D DCE‐US and assesses its efficacy when handling clinical data sets. Methods In brief, the algorithm uses a pyramidal approach whereby short temporal windows consisting of three consecutive frames are created to perform local registrations, which are then registered to a master reference derived from a weighted average of all frames. We applied the algorithm to imaging studies from eight patients with metastatic lesions in the liver and assessed improvements in original versus motion corrected 3D DCE‐US cine using: (i) frame‐to‐frame volumetric overlap of segmented lesions, (ii) normalized correlation coefficient (NCC) between frames (similarity analysis), and (iii) sum of squared errors (SSE), root‐mean‐squared error (RMSE), and r‐squared (R2) quality‐of‐fit from fitted time‐intensity curves (TIC) extracted from a segmented lesion. Results We noted improvements in frame‐to‐frame lesion overlap across all patients, from 68% ± 13% without correction to 83% ± 3% with MC (p = 0.023). Frame‐to‐frame similarity as assessed by NCC also improved on two different sets of time points from 0.694 ± 0.057 (original cine) to 0.862 ± 0.049 (corresponding MC cine) and 0.723 ± 0.066 to 0.886 ± 0.036 (p ≤ 0.001 for both). TIC analysis displayed a significant decrease in RMSE (p = 0.018) and a significant increase in R2 goodness‐of‐fit (p = 0.029) for the patient cohort. Conclusions Overall, results suggest decreases in 3D DCE‐US motion after applying the proposed algorithm.

Motion Compensation for 3D Multispectral Handheld Photoacoustic Imaging

Image-based 3D Non-Rigid Respiratory Motion Correction for Free-Breathing Thoracic MR Angiography

3-D Motion Correction for Volumetric Super-Resolution Ultrasound (SR-US) Imaging

Ultrasound-Guided Breath-Compensation in Single-Element Photoacoustic Imaging for Three-Dimensional Whole-Body Images of Mice

Motion correction of 3D dynamic contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging without anatomical B‐Mode images: Pilot evaluation in eight patients

Motion Correction in Optical Resolution Photoacoustic Microscopy

Correction of high-rate motion for photoacoustic microscopy by orthogonal cross-correlation

Motion-Aware Robotic 3D Ultrasound

3D Ultrasound Imaging of Residual Limbs With Camera-Based Motion Compensation

Panoramic Volumetric Clinical Handheld Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging

A Feasibility Study of 3D Motion Compensation in 3D Diverging Wave Compounding

[Progress of motion artifact correction in photoacoustic microscopy and photoacoustic tomography]

Subpixel and On-Line Motion Correction for Photoacoustic Dermoscopy

Model-based optical and acoustical compensation for photoacoustic tomography of heterogeneous mediums

Doppler and Pair-Wise Optical Flow Constrained 3D Motion Compensation for 3D Ultrasound Imaging.

Simultaneous segmentation and motion recovery in 3d cardiac image analysis

A 3D Motion Compensation Method for High Frame Rate Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging Based on Velocity Vector Estimation: A Simulation Study

Review of Three-Dimensional Handheld Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging Systems and Their Applications

Robotic Motion Compensation for Beating Heart Intracardiac Surgery

Subpixel Motion Artifacts Correction and Motion Estimation for 3D-OCT.

Optical Fluence Compensation for Handheld Photoacoustic Probe: an in Vivo Human Study Case