Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a three‐dimensional framework to facilitate future definitions of intellectual capital (IC). The concept of IC is often ill‐defined and there is a multitude of different definitions for the construct of IC. The lack of a common platform for dialogue has negative implications for research and practice in the field as it has hinders cross‐disciplinary learning. This paper aims to presents a flexible framework in order to make important differences explicit and therefore, if adopted, facilitates the creation of a cohesive body of knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The paper utilises a systematic review process. This methodology was initially developed in the medical science to produce a replicable, scientific, and transparent analysis of evidence in the literature and has recently been broad into management science. A total of 938 papers were analysed to extract findings. The summary of the review protocol can be found in the Appendix. Findings Analysing the literature allowed the necessary components of a definition together with a list of possible sub‐components to be extracted. Definitions of IC need to be explicit about the: component parts of the construct; role IC will take in an organisation; and disciplinary perspective taken for the discussion. Research limitations/implications This paper presents the necessary components of a definition of IC. If widely used, it would be able to facilitate cross‐disciplinary understanding and hopefully inter‐disciplinary research. It is seen as a starting point and open for future extension and development. A systematic review aims to limit bias and random error, however, it is limited by its scope on the basis of the defined research question and therefore delimited by factors outlined in the research protocol. Practical implications The major implication for practitioners is the understanding that IC can mean very different things for different people. Insights outlined in this paper will enable anyone to understand better the important construct of IC from different perspectives, which in turn should facilitate dialogue and avoid many unnecessary misunderstandings. Originality/value The paper is a first attempt to present a framework to facilitate future definitions of IC. If used, discussed, and extended in the future, it could present an important corner stone for better cross‐disciplinary dialogue and the establishment of a research field of IC.

Conceptualizing academic intellectual capital: definition and proposal of a measurement scale

Academic human capital in universities: definition and proposal of a measurement scale

Measuring innovative literacy: conceptualization, scale development and validation

Measuring qualities needed for interdisciplinary work: The Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research Scale (IVIRS)

Defining intellectual capital: a three‐dimensional approach

Measuring Intellectual Capital:a New Model and Empirical Study

How to promote the employability capital of university students? Developing and validating scales

Indicator system for managing science, technology and innovation in universities

Holistic spiritual capital: definition and its measurement

Financial Literacy – Conceptual Definition and Proposed Approach for a Measurement Instrument

An Intellectual Capital Risk Measurement Model Using Bayesian Network

How effectual will you be? Development and validation of a scale in higher education

The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale

Building ambidextrous organizations through intellectual capital: a proposal for a multilevel model

Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of intellectual humility

Psychometric properties and factorial structure of the Spanish version of the psychological capital scale in Ecuadorian university students

Development of a measurement index of critical thinking in professional formation

A New Measurement of Intellectual Capital and Its Impact on Innovation Performance in an Open Innovation Paradigm

Human Capital Measurement: A Bibliometric Survey

Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance through intrinsic motivation in higher education institutions

Intellectual capital: the missing link in the corporate social responsibility–financial performance relationship